On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Christoph Willing wrote:
>
> On 17/12/2010, at 9:40 AM, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Christoph Willing
>>> wrote:
On 11/12/2010, at 1:04 AM, Matto Fransen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Christoph Willing
> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/12/2010, at 1:04 AM, Matto Fransen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 10:21:49PM -0800, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
>>>
Has anyone tried running a GUI app (
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Christoph Willing wrote:
>
> On 11/12/2010, at 1:04 AM, Matto Fransen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 10:21:49PM -0800, Nirmal Guhan wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone tried running a GUI app (firefox for instance) inside a
>>> container or as an application co
Im going to test lxc on Debian Squeez kernel 2.6.36.2 and I launch CentOS
5.5
With lxc version 0.72
All works well
My config is
lxc.utsname = centos
lxc.tty = 4
lxc.network.type = veth
lxc.network.veth.pair = eth-centos
lxc.network.flags = up
lxc.network.link = br0
lxc.network.name
On 12/16/2010 02:39 AM, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> Some combinations of RAM and swap caps aren't allowed, and I'm having a
> hard time understanding the pattern (i.e. *why*). From the examples
> below, I *think* I cannot assign a smaller swap cap than RAM cap.
>
> Also, is there a way to specify that
On 12/16/2010 04:07 AM, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> t...@cybersource.com.au (Trent W. Buck)
> writes:
>
>
>> Serge Hallyn
>> writes:
>>
>>
>>> You have:
>>>
>>> lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:3 rwm
>>> lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:5 rwm
>>> lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:8 rwm
>>> lxc.cgroup