Re: [Lxc-users] concurrent aptitude/dpkg runs in separate containers --> bork bork bork

2011-02-03 Thread Trent W. Buck
Wrapping eatmydata around dpkg "fixes" the problem; details below. Trent Buck wrote (offlist): > As I now understand it, the facts are these: > > - lucid's dpkg uses an fsync-per-file > > - lucid-security's dpkg uses a sync-per-rename, because fsync was > slow (only on ext4/btrfs, I think

Re: [Lxc-users] Network configuration

2011-02-03 Thread Andre Nathan
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 09:09 -0800, Dean Mao wrote: > You can just add a new bridge with "brctl addbr br7" if you wanted to > add a bridge 7... then configure it with "ifconfig br7 172.16.0.1 > netmask 255.255.255.0 up" and you'll have a new network on the same > computer. Didn't know that... I th

Re: [Lxc-users] Ubuntu sshd template

2011-02-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 02/03/2011 10:51 PM, Gary Ballantyne wrote: > > On 2/3/2011 1:47 PM, Trent W. Buck wrote: >> Gary Ballantyne >> writes: >> >>> # /usr/bin/lxc-execute -n foo -f >>> /usr/share/doc/lxc/examples/lxc-veth.conf /bin/bash >>> >>> The container fired up, and I could ping to/from the host. However, wh

Re: [Lxc-users] Ubuntu sshd template

2011-02-03 Thread Gary Ballantyne
On 2/3/2011 1:47 PM, Trent W. Buck wrote: > Gary Ballantyne > writes: > >> # /usr/bin/lxc-execute -n foo -f >> /usr/share/doc/lxc/examples/lxc-veth.conf /bin/bash >> >> The container fired up, and I could ping to/from the host. However, when >> I left the container (with "exit") things got weird

Re: [Lxc-users] concurrent aptitude/dpkg runs in separate containers --> bork bork bork

2011-02-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 02/03/2011 07:08 AM, Trent W. Buck wrote: > t...@cybersource.com.au (Trent W. Buck) > writes: > >> I'm being a bit more patient than last time, and I think they ARE >> proceeding, just REALLY slowly. Meanwhile aptitude consumes a 100% of a >> core busy-waiting for a response from dpkg :-/ >> >>

Re: [Lxc-users] Network configuration

2011-02-03 Thread Dean Mao
The bridges are essentially dummy interfaces -- you can add as many as you want, and have them on random networks if you want, and have complicated routing schemes between them. I don't think you need to create a dummy interface anywhere. You can just add a new bridge with "brctl addbr br7" if yo

Re: [Lxc-users] Network configuration

2011-02-03 Thread Andre Nathan
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 09:13 -0200, Andre Nathan wrote: > eth0 -> external network > eth1 -> 10.0.0.0/16 network > containers -> 192.168.0.0/16 network Hmm I managed to do this creating a dummy interface and setting up a bridge on it, so now I have eth0 -> external network eth1 -> 10.0.0.0/16 netw

Re: [Lxc-users] Network configuration

2011-02-03 Thread Andre Nathan
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 12:07 -0800, Dean Mao wrote: > Yeah, it's quite easy to do this. Here's my lxc network config from > one of my machines: > > > lxc.network.type = veth > lxc.network.flags = up > lxc.network.link = br1 > lxc.network.ipv4 = 192.168.0.4/24 > > > My outside network is eth0/br