Re: [Lxc-users] cannot start any more any container?!

2011-10-19 Thread Ulli Horlacher
On Wed 2011-10-19 (22:11), Papp Tamas wrote: > What version of lxc package do you use? See my first mail: lxc version: 0.7.4.1 -- Ullrich Horlacher Server- und Arbeitsplatzsysteme Rechenzentrum E-Mail: horlac...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de Universitaet Stuttgart

Re: [Lxc-users] cannot start any more any container?!

2011-10-19 Thread Papp Tamas
On 10/19/2011 09:28 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote: > On Wed 2011-10-19 (21:24), Papp Tamas wrote: >> On 10/19/2011 09:18 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote: >> >>> root@vms1:/lxc# ps axf | grep vmtest1 >>> 31571 ?Ds 0:00 lxc-start -f /data/lxc/vmtest1.cfg -n vmtest1 -d >>> -o /data/lxc/vmtest1.log >>

Re: [Lxc-users] cannot start any more any container?!

2011-10-19 Thread Ulli Horlacher
On Wed 2011-10-19 (21:24), Papp Tamas wrote: > On 10/19/2011 09:18 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote: > > > root@vms1:/lxc# ps axf | grep vmtest1 > > 31571 ?Ds 0:00 lxc-start -f /data/lxc/vmtest1.cfg -n vmtest1 -d > > -o /data/lxc/vmtest1.log > > 2171 ?Ds 0:00 lxc-start -f /data/

Re: [Lxc-users] cannot start any more any container?!

2011-10-19 Thread Papp Tamas
On 10/19/2011 09:18 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote: > root@vms1:/lxc# ps axf | grep vmtest1 > 31571 ?Ds 0:00 lxc-start -f /data/lxc/vmtest1.cfg -n vmtest1 -d > -o /data/lxc/vmtest1.log > 2171 ?Ds 0:00 lxc-start -f /data/lxc/vmtest1.cfg -n vmtest1 -l > DEBUG -d -o /data/lxc/vmt

Re: [Lxc-users] cannot start any more any container?!

2011-10-19 Thread Ulli Horlacher
On Wed 2011-10-19 (13:49), Brian K. White wrote: > I haven't scrutinized your info in detail but one quick question, did > you have vsftpd running in the containers No. I have no ftp-service running at all. > If you change the name of the container it will create a new cgroup > based on the

Re: [Lxc-users] cannot start any more any container?!

2011-10-19 Thread Ulli Horlacher
On Wed 2011-10-19 (19:37), Papp Tamas wrote: > > Besides my problem with "cannot stop/kill lxc-start" (see other mail), I > > have now an even more severe problem: I cannot start ANY container anymore! > > > > I boot the container with: > > > > root@vms1:/lxc# lxc-start -f /data/lxc/vmtest1.cfg -n

Re: [Lxc-users] OUI

2011-10-19 Thread Ryan Campbell
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Robert Pendell wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Papp Tamas wrote: >> On 10/19/2011 12:36 AM, Derek Simkowiak wrote: >> >>> But actually I think, lxc-virt.org sounds better. >> >>     I disagree with lxc-virt.org. >> >>     The difference between "contain

[Lxc-users] sshd broken on fedora -- status of Ubuntu patches?

2011-10-19 Thread Ryan Campbell
fedora 13 / Linux 2.6.34 I tried to create an sshd container, but received an error when I try to start it: lxc-create -n sshd -t sshd ... # lxc-start -n sshd /usr/local/lib/lxc/lxc-init is /usr/local/lib/lxc/lxc-init sshd is /usr/sbin/sshd lxc-init: Read-only file system - failed to create '/de

Re: [Lxc-users] cannot start any more any container?!

2011-10-19 Thread Brian K. White
On 10/19/2011 1:24 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote: > Besides my problem with "cannot stop/kill lxc-start" (see other mail), I > have now an even more severe problem: I cannot start ANY container anymore! > > I am sure I have overlooked something, but I cannot see what. I am really > desperate now, becaus

Re: [Lxc-users] cannot start any more any container?!

2011-10-19 Thread Papp Tamas
On 10/19/2011 07:24 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote: > Besides my problem with "cannot stop/kill lxc-start" (see other mail), I > have now an even more severe problem: I cannot start ANY container anymore! > > I am sure I have overlooked something, but I cannot see what. I am really > desperate now, becau

Re: [Lxc-users] Bug discussion: implementing high virtual device MAC addresses

2011-10-19 Thread Brian K. White
On 10/18/2011 7:31 PM, Derek Simkowiak wrote: > That MAC address has nothing to do with the bug; the host's bridge > device (br0) will never assume a configured LXC MAC address as its own. > Instead, the MAC address in question is the one of the virtual veth > device, as shown with "ifco

[Lxc-users] cannot start any more any container?!

2011-10-19 Thread Ulli Horlacher
Besides my problem with "cannot stop/kill lxc-start" (see other mail), I have now an even more severe problem: I cannot start ANY container anymore! I am sure I have overlooked something, but I cannot see what. I am really desperate now, because this happens to my production environment! Server h

[Lxc-users] cannot stop/kill lxc-start

2011-10-19 Thread Ulli Horlacher
I have some lxc-start processes which I cannot stop or kill: root@vms2:/lxc# psg bunny USER PID PPID %CPUVSZ COMMAND root 27033 1 0.0 20872 lxc-start -f /data/lxc/bunny.cfg -n bunny -d -o /data/lxc/bunny.log root 26620 1 0.0 20872 lxc-start -f /data/lxc/bunny.cfg

Re: [Lxc-users] OUI

2011-10-19 Thread Robert Pendell
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Papp Tamas wrote: > On 10/19/2011 12:36 AM, Derek Simkowiak wrote: > >> But actually I think, lxc-virt.org sounds better. > > I disagree with lxc-virt.org. > > The difference between "container" and "virtual machine" is already > confusing enough. There is

Re: [Lxc-users] skype in a lxc

2011-10-19 Thread Lyssa Rabies
Hello, thanks for your answere. Of course I had allowed video devices for my container, that was not the problem. I could use it with any programm which i can give a parameter to use the specific video device. i found a solution. i think it was the missing /dev/bus folder but i will look into my

[Lxc-users] bind mount problem with underlying nfs mount

2011-10-19 Thread Lyssa Rabies
Hello, i have one folder with two sub folders including nfs mounts. /data/nfs_mount{1,2} lxc config file: ... lxc.mount.entry=/data /var/lib/lxc/trinity/rootfs/data none bind 0 0 ... In the container i can see the two folders but not the underlying nfs mounts. I have mounted both nfs bevor star

Re: [Lxc-users] OUI

2011-10-19 Thread Papp Tamas
On 10/19/2011 12:36 AM, Derek Simkowiak wrote: > /But actually I think, lxc-virt.org sounds better./ I disagree with lxc-virt.org. The difference between "container" and "virtual machine" is already confusing enough. There is no virtualization layer in LXC, so I don't think "virt" sh

Re: [Lxc-users] Graceful shutdowns: current best practices?

2011-10-19 Thread Jäkel , Guido
>> 4. Which signal? SIGINT? SIGPWR? Both? > >Does only work for init based systems, not for upstart, like Ubuntu! Dear Derek, Sending a SIGINT to init will invoke the alsctrldel entry of the /etc/inittab . A SIGPWR will (in absence of /etc/powerfail) call the powerfail entry. In a common s