[Lxc-users] Dual WAN router config

I came up with a issue about how to dual WAN router with two WiFi adapters that might see subnet collisions. The scenarios is this, say two generous neighbors will let me connect to their APs, both AP are connected to two different ISPs, but their LAN setups are using the same network/subnet. Examp

Re: [Lxc-users] SIOCGIFNAME

On 05/29/2012 10:10 PM, Papp Tamas wrote: > On 05/29/2012 07:29 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> >> On 05/29/2012 03:48 PM, Papp Tamas wrote: >>> hi All, >>> >>> >>> This doesn't work now: >>> >>> ioctl(3, SIOCGIFNAME, {ifr_index=0, ifr_name=???}) = -1 ENODEV (No such >>> device) >>> >>> >>> Is there a

Re: [Lxc-users] Lxc-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 14

Hi,all I am running a case based on two containers in one host.One container is used to write into shared memory,and the other is used to backup.The problem is comming.The backup container's process have so much try to compete the lock resource.And If the two containers are in different host .

Re: [Lxc-users] SIOCGIFNAME

On 05/29/2012 07:29 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 05/29/2012 03:48 PM, Papp Tamas wrote: >> hi All, >> >> >> This doesn't work now: >> >> ioctl(3, SIOCGIFNAME, {ifr_index=0, ifr_name=???}) = -1 ENODEV (No such >> device) >> >> >> Is there any way to make it work? > > Yep, the index are not virtu

Re: [Lxc-users] SIOCGIFNAME

On 05/29/2012 03:48 PM, Papp Tamas wrote: > hi All, > > > This doesn't work now: > > ioctl(3, SIOCGIFNAME, {ifr_index=0, ifr_name=???}) = -1 ENODEV (No such > device) > > > Is there any way to make it work? Yep, the index are not virtualized. So ifr_index=0 is for the loopback in the init network

[Lxc-users] SIOCGIFNAME

hi All, This doesn't work now: ioctl(3, SIOCGIFNAME, {ifr_index=0, ifr_name=???}) = -1 ENODEV (No such device) Is there any way to make it work? Thank you, tamas -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live e