Re: [Lxc-users] lxc-ls --fancy is lying

2013-08-04 Thread Tamas Papp
On 08/02/2013 11:51 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Tamas Papp (tom...@martos.bme.hu): >> hi All, >> >> I've seen a couple of times in the past like this: >> >> # lxc-ls --fancy --stopped --fancy-format name,state >> NAME STATE >> >> finance STOPPED >> hammer

Re: [Lxc-users] Setting up server in lxc container for dummies

2013-08-04 Thread Tony Su
To be visible to outside the LAN does not require a second physical NIC, there are a number of ways to do that binding to a single NIC. The OP needs to post a more detailed description of his topology. Tony On Aug 3, 2013 4:49 PM, "Kevin LaTona" wrote: > > Tony, > > You are correct I did make a

Re: [Lxc-users] Setting up server in lxc container for dummies

2013-08-04 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Kevin LaTona wrote: > > > Can any one point me towards a good source(s) of information about using > multi bridges with LXC's if that is even possible or suggested yet? > > It's pretty much straight forward. Create a bridge, then use it in lxc config file. > I c

Re: [Lxc-users] local subnet

2013-08-04 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Bretton Woods wrote: > ps thanks > > http://noyaudolive.net/2012/05/09/lxc-and-macvlan-host-to-guest-connection/ > > Personally I'd stick with the default veth-on-bridge setup. > -- > *From:* Bretton Woods > ** > > I have been th