On 05/24/2013 09:21 AM, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
>> Ok, who wants to be co-administrator of the mailing list ?
> Tamas and Mike
>
Ok, thanks.
--
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-bas
On 05/24/2013 08:31 AM, Tamas Papp wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 02:06 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Yes, sure.
>>
>> Sorry, I have been more and more busy with other stuff and flooded by
>> emails, so I did not followed the discussion closely.
>>
>> Can you
On 05/23/2013 11:44 PM, Tamas Papp wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 11:13 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>> Last I knew, it was Daniel who created the list and most likely "owns"
>> it. It was created at my suggestion to move "user" questions off the
>> "devel" list ages and ages ago. Lately he's typically
On 05/11/2013 04:41 AM, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I'm trying to get LXC to work for me on Debian Wheezy/amd64 and I'm having a
> Hellish time. I'm following the advice on wiki.debian.org and other places,
> and I believe I'm creating my containers correctly, but when I launch a
> co
he bug (which is probably a signal
SIGTTOU/IN received).
Thanks
-- Daniel
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> mailto:daniel.lezc...@free.fr>> wrote:
>
> On 04/15/2013 03:26 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Somnath Mitra (somnath.mi...@
On 04/15/2013 03:26 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Somnath Mitra (somnath.mi...@xockets.com):
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>
>>> Quoting Somnath Mitra (somnath.mi...@xockets.com):
>>>
>> > Since the container rootfs is shared with host I am confused why it
>>> cannot
On 11/01/2012 09:41 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 21:20 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> On 11/01/2012 09:08 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>>> I know, I KNOW this is an 11th hour request. Can we please get Serge's
>>> autodev stuff into this release? Please?
>> release ea
Thanks to everyone for fixing this.
I am about to release the 0.8.0 version.
I will wait a couple of days before adding a tag and release it in case
there are some fixes to add.
Please test.
Thanks !
-- Daniel
On 10/31/2012 04:45 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This is an automated email f
(ip link add new type veth) then network-interface jobs are
> created. With this patch, behavior comes in line with a regular host.
>
> v2: also send KOBJ_ADD to new netns. There will then be a
> _MOVE event from the device_rename() call, but that should
> be innocuous.
>
> Signed
On 07/20/2012 07:14 PM, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Stuart Yoder wrote:
>> After I start a container with lxc-start (no -d), ctrl-C doesn''t
>> working for me in the container's console.
>>
>> In the documentation at http://lxc.teegra.net/ it says:
>>
>> The termina
On 07/17/2012 05:12 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 17 July 2012 13:59, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>> On 07/16/2012 09:24 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I've come across an issue when trying to use SCTP with lxc, and I
>>> wonder if anyone might have some insight into what's causing this.
On 07/17/2012 05:12 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 17 July 2012 13:59, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>> On 07/16/2012 09:24 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I've come across an issue when trying to use SCTP with lxc, and I
>>> wonder if anyone might have some insight into what's causing this.
On 07/03/2012 02:29 PM, Hans Feldt wrote:
> Thanks for looking into it.
>
> It means some applications cannot run unmodified in a container then?
Did you try by mounting the cgroup but without the 'cpu' subsystem ?
-- Daniel
>
> /Hans
>
> On 07/02/12 19:08, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> This appears
On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About a week ago I posted exactly the same question on this list, but I
> didn't get any responses. I have googled high and low for the answer to
> this, but no result. It's not related to capabilities, because you can only
> drop capabilities,
On 05/30/2012 09:35 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 04:28 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> On 05/29/2012 10:10 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
>>> On 05/29/2012 07:29 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 05/29/2012 03:48 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
>&
On 05/29/2012 10:10 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 07:29 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> On 05/29/2012 03:48 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
>>> hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>> This doesn't work now:
>>>
>>> ioctl(3, SIOCGIFNAME, {ifr_ind
On 05/29/2012 03:48 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> hi All,
>
>
> This doesn't work now:
>
> ioctl(3, SIOCGIFNAME, {ifr_index=0, ifr_name=???}) = -1 ENODEV (No such
> device)
>
>
> Is there any way to make it work?
Yep, the index are not virtualized. So ifr_index=0 is for the loopback
in the init network
On 04/26/2012 07:09 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> From: Serge Hallyn
>
> If /var/lib/lxc is a separate filesystem, and you start and stop only
> a single container which has it's rootfs at /var/lib/lxc/c1/rootfs,
> then /var/lib/lxc will be re-mounted readonly when the container, at
> shutdown, does 'm
On 04/26/2012 07:09 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> From: Serge Hallyn
>
> Author: Timothy Chen
> Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/980902
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
> Cc: Timothy Chen
> ---
> src/lxc/lxc-destroy.in |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff
On 05/16/2012 08:58 AM, Jianbin Ma wrote:
> In the container,the system call sched_scheduler can't work,I enable the
> file capabilities.And the system call still can't work.
What is your RLIMIT_RTPRIO value in the container ?
Do you have CAP_SYS_NICE ?
What policy are trying to set ?
Thanks
On 05/14/2012 11:27 AM, Miroslav Lednicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i am trying running siproxd in LXC (ubuntu 10.04 is LXC guest
> and 11.10 is host). Siproxd not working and i see in syslog:
>
> rtpproxy_relay.c:150 ERROR:pthread_setschedparam failed: Operation not
> permitted
>
> Where can be pr
On 04/26/2012 03:58 PM, Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote:
> It's a bit difficult for me to follow patches when they are going to two
> separate mailing lists. Would it be possible to limit patches to the
> lxc-devel list, please? I think that is the intended place for them.
Yes.
Please, everyon
On 03/19/2012 02:45 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> On 03/19/2012 12:00 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great ideas, we can now cleanly shut down
>
On 03/19/2012 03:50 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
>> On 03/19/2012 12:00 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great ideas, we can now cleanly shut down
>>> a contai
On 03/19/2012 12:00 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great ideas, we can now cleanly shut down
> a container by sending it SIGPWR. I'm attaching two ways to do that.
> In-line is a patch which modifies lxc-stop to take optional -s and -t
> args - -s for shutdown (mea
On 03/14/2012 03:39 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> (which reminds me a lxc-clone manpage still needs to be written)
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
> ---
Fixed duplicate /varlistentry below (line 158 in the file) and applied.
Thanks
-- Daniel
[ ... ]
> the template, you can run
> + lxc-c
On 03/12/2012 05:21 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> 1. fix inconsistent use of '--auth-key' (not --auth_key) which broke their
> usage
> 2. add --debug option to lxc-ubuntu (which does set -x to show what broke)
> (idea from Idea from lifeless and benji)
> 3. fix incorrect assumption about group
On 03/12/2012 04:52 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> We were doing the check for whether we need to watch utmp from a
> thread cloned from that which will actually do the utmp watching.
> As a result, the utmp file was always being watched, even if it
> didn't need to be.
>
> Move the check to the parent
On 03/01/2012 06:49 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> On Tue 2011-10-18 (14:54), Papp Tamas wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to limit the maximum number of processes per container?
> I have the same problem. A user has killed the host (and therefore all
> containers) with a simple shell command: :(){ :|:& };
On 03/02/2012 11:18 AM, Arun M wrote:
>
>
>> With the 0.8.0 version, you will be able to setup the gateway directly
>> from the configuration file.
>
> Cool. I wanted to try this so tested with the latest code from repository.
>
> However hit another issue now.
>
> $ lxc-execute -n alpha -f n1.conf
On 03/02/2012 11:18 AM, Arun M wrote:
>
>
>> With the 0.8.0 version, you will be able to setup the gateway directly
>> from the configuration file.
>
> Cool. I wanted to try this so tested with the latest code from repository.
>
> However hit another issue now.
>
> $ lxc-execute -n alpha -f n1.conf
On 03/01/2012 08:32 PM, Arun M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to add a default gateway inside a lxc container so that the
> application can talk to outside network.
>
> I used lxc-setcap to set capabilities and started the container as a non-root
> user.
>
> lxc-execute -n alpha -f a.conf -- /bin/
On 10/18/2011 02:54 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> hi!
>
> Is it possible to limit the maximum number of processes per container?
>
Not yet but it is on the way.
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1109.0/01455.html
Hope the patchset will be merged soon in the kernel.
-- Daniel
Hi all,
I will release a 0.8.0-rc1. I am looking for volunteer to test it :)
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
On 02/24/2012 01:31 PM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
> Hi all, this message is just to ask for the current state of lxc-attach
> support entering into mainstream Linux source code. I've seen that
> there are some patches[1] for 3.0 which don't apply cleanly to 3.1 and
> newer, and Christian Seile
On 02/15/2012 11:51 AM, bruce bushby wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been following these two guides:
> https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-67682
> http://berrange.com/posts/2011/09/27/getting-started-with-lxc-using-libvirt/
>
> and I finally have a container running (Happy Days) I wanted to ask
> the list
On 02/13/2012 07:45 AM, Kristian Kirilov wrote:
>> On 02/12/2012 09:24 PM, Kristian Kirilov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> im looking for lxc patch to correct LXC issues with namespaces detecting
>>> in 3... kernel.
>>> I maked some tests with LXC lxc-0.7.5.tar.gz and kernel
>>> linux-3.2.5.tar.bz2. Eve
On 02/12/2012 09:24 PM, Kristian Kirilov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> im looking for lxc patch to correct LXC issues with namespaces detecting
> in 3... kernel.
> I maked some tests with LXC lxc-0.7.5.tar.gz and kernel
> linux-3.2.5.tar.bz2. Everything is ok but namespaces checking in
> lxc-checkconfig is s
On 01/31/2012 04:08 PM, Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> I try to get lxc compiling on a Sunfire V245, but configure fails:
>
> [...]
>
> checking for sys/signalfd.h... yes
> checking whether gcc needs -traditional... no
> checking for Linux in /lib/modules//build... not found
> checking for Linux in
On 01/12/2012 04:56 AM, 陈竞 wrote:
> Hi, i installed lxc in my gentoo os, and compile the kernel, but when i
> test lxc, as :
Is CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE=y ?
> lxc-execute -n test /bin/sh
> lxc-init: failed to mount /dev/mqueue : No such device
>
> apparently i have mqueue in /dev, i need help, thank
On 01/10/2012 01:39 AM, Fred Finkelstein wrote:
> I finally found it with the help of the #lxcontainers irc channel. I have
> to replace this in lxc.fstab:
> /dev/shm /dev/shm bind 0 0
> with this:
> /dev/shm /srv/shm none bind 0 0
> and I can access it.
Why /srv/shm ?
--
local/var --prefix=/usr/local
and then create
mkdir /usr/local/var/lib/lxc
> Is this Bug?
>
>
> On 2012/01/03, at 19:08, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2012 04:34 AM, T.Nomura wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> My name is Mr.Nomura.
>>>
>>>
On 12/30/2011 12:14 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> On Mon 2011-12-26 (18:25), Wai-kit Sze wrote:
>
>> What are the difference between application containers and system
>> containers? Both of them can start a command directly.
> An application container starts one single program.
> A system container s
On 01/03/2012 04:34 AM, T.Nomura wrote:
> Hi
>
> My name is Mr.Nomura.
>
> I want install lxc "/usr/local/lxc".
> So, I runed configure script below.
> # ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/lxc&& make&& make install
>
> Next I run "lxc-create".But output below error.
> configuration path '/lib/lx
029.html
Yes, I was aware of that. I was just explaining why disabling setfd was
useful.
I have queued the patch to set an higher mac address.
Thanks
-- Daniel
> Thanks,
> Derek
>
> On 12/11/2011 02:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 12/08/2011 09:25 AM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
>
On 12/08/2011 09:25 AM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> On Thu 2011-12-08 (07:39), Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 12/08/2011 12:38 AM, Joseph Heck wrote:
>>
>>> I've been seeing a pause in the whole networking stack when starting
>>> and stopping LXC - it seems to
On 12/08/2011 12:38 AM, Joseph Heck wrote:
> I've been seeing a pause in the whole networking stack when starting
> and stopping LXC - it seems to be somewhat intermittent, but happens
> reasonably consistently the first time I start up the LXC.
>
> I'm using ubuntu 11.10, which is using LXC 0.7.5
On 12/05/2011 04:58 PM, István Király - LaKing wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I wrote a guide how to get lxc running on CentOs host, with CentOS or Fedora
> 14 guest.
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=272995
>
> I could not get FC15/FC16 containers to work tho. I read somewhere it is
> bec
On 11/15/2011 10:14 AM, bruce bushby wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm hoping someone on the list could answer a couple of questions. I
> believe Linux Containers are the perfect answer to some of the issues
> I have at work but wanted to confirm some technical bits before
> formally submitting any designs. I
On 11/10/2011 03:43 AM, 张勇 wrote:
> Hi~:
> I meet a error when i make lxc-0.7.5 on ubuntu 10.04.
> The error info is :
>
Maybe the docbook tools are not available on your system.
You can prevent the documentation to be generated by specifying the
--disable-doc option for the configure script.
>
On 11/05/2011 12:06 AM, Dong-In David Kang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to do "mknod" after creation of an LXC instance?
> I need to do "mknod" not only at bootup time, but also at run-time.
> This is needed when I want to dynamically add devices to LXC instance.
> Is it possible?
> If it is
On 11/04/2011 03:34 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
>
> I have a container that's used to build a Linux image for an embedded
> device - and as part of the build script, it creates /dev/ via a sequence
> of mknod commands Which all fail )-:
>
> There are no cap.drop lines in the contianers config
On 10/25/2011 03:09 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Ulli Horlacher (frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de):
>> On Mon 2011-10-24 (18:56), Ulli Horlacher wrote:
>>
>>> vms1 is an Ubuntu 10.04 based host system (4 * Xeon 64bit) with:
>>>
>>> root@vms1:/lxc# uname -a
>>> Linux vms1 2.6.38-11-server #50~l
On 10/24/2011 07:09 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> It prevents containers from getting a good resolv.conf without doing
> ifdown eth0; ifup eth0.
>
> (see pad.lv/880020)
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
> ---
Applied.
Thanks.
---
On 10/24/2011 09:53 PM, Joerg Gollnick wrote:
> Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2011, 21:16:04 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> On 10/24/2011 08:59 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 10/24/2011 07:46 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
>>>> On Mon 2011-10-24 (12:33), Serge E. Hallyn wr
On 10/24/2011 08:59 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 10/24/2011 07:46 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
>> On Mon 2011-10-24 (12:33), Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>
>>>> http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/tmp/vms1-crash.png
>>>>
>>>> It's a pity, but this co
On 10/24/2011 08:40 PM, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote:
> Le 24/10/2011 19:46, Ulli Horlacher a écrit :
>
>> 2011-10-24 19:34:40 [ 318.526208] br0: port 2(veth2WqDOb) entering
>> forwarding state
>> 2011-10-24 19:34:40 [ 318.675038] br0: port 2(veth2WqDOb) entering disabled
>> state
>> 2011-10-24 19
On 10/24/2011 07:46 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> On Mon 2011-10-24 (12:33), Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
>>> http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/tmp/vms1-crash.png
>>>
>>> It's a pity, but this console server (HP IP console) cannot log ASCII
>>> based, it is GUI only. I can make only screenshots and cannot
On 10/24/2011 07:46 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> On Mon 2011-10-24 (12:33), Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
>>> http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/tmp/vms1-crash.png
>>>
>>> It's a pity, but this console server (HP IP console) cannot log ASCII
>>> based, it is GUI only. I can make only screenshots and cannot
On 09/14/2011 10:27 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Otherwise you get 'lxc.utsname =' in config, instead of the
> actual hostname being filled in.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/850205
>
> Index: lxc/src/lxc/lxc-clone.in
Hi Serge,
I was not able to apply this patch, it fails
On 09/15/2011 10:53 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> End the command with ';', which is needed, and put the hostname in
> quotes (which doesn't really seem needed, but shown in man page).
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
> ---
Applied.
--
On 09/15/2011 03:30 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Thought I had sent this before, but I don't find it anywhere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
> ---
Applied.
--
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow
On 09/15/2011 03:21 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> This isn't particularly reassuring, and will be moot with user
> namespaces, but as people are asking for it, turn off sys_module.
> While we're at it, turn off mac_admin and mac_override.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
> ---
Applied.
On 09/15/2011 03:12 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> If multiple cgroups are mounted under /sys/fs/cgroup, then the
> original check ends up looking for /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.clone_children,
> which does not exist because that is just a tmpfs.
>
> So make sure to check an actual cgroupfs.
>
> Signed-of
On 09/15/2011 03:11 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> /dev/shm is a symlink to /run/shm, so we need /run/shm
> to exist in the container rootfs. Also, /dev/mqueue does
> not exist on the host, and can't be created by the container.
> But we don't really need it so ignore that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge
On 10/20/2011 10:16 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Otherwise we end up with a bad container fstab and a container
> that won't boot. See
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/879052
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
> ---
Applied.
--
On 10/24/2011 02:07 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> On Mon 2011-10-24 (12:03), Greg Kurz wrote:
>
>> C/R and live migration is a complicated matter for LXC containers.
> I have assumed nothing else...
>
>
>> No status for the moment... I guess people who really want migration
>> should participate
> No
On 10/21/2011 02:33 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> On Thu 2011-10-20 (09:00), Papp Tamas wrote:
>
>> Well, I don't see anything like this. Actually I use 0.7.5. Try to upgrade.
> After upgrading to lxc 0.7.5 the problem is still there:
> I cannot start any container and there is no (log) output at all
On 10/06/2011 08:45 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com):
>> Ideally, for the stated purpose, we need something not named ubuntu.
> I almost didn't create the page for that reason, but then decided the
> content can always get moved if/when someone gets a better domain
On 10/05/2011 03:43 PM, Lyssa Rabies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i use different linux distributions and versions of distributions inside
> linux containers, so my desktop environment is also running inside a
> container. So i don't need to use full virtualisation - i have lxc and i'am
> very happy with it
On 09/21/2011 06:57 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> On 09/21/2011 05:47 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> my laptop was stolen yesterday. My email backup history ends to 08/09/2011.
>&
On 09/21/2011 05:47 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> my laptop was stolen yesterday. My email backup history ends to 08/09/2011.
For English people :)
September 8th
> Is it possible to resend the patches please ?
>
> Thanks !
Hi all,
my laptop was stolen yesterday. My email backup history ends to 08/09/2011.
Is it possible to resend the patches please ?
Thanks !
-- Daniel
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
On 09/15/2011 11:55 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Commit 92c7f6295518decd3989b2790d75551e7d9a broke the following scipts:
> - lxc-setcap
> - lxc-setuid
> - lxc-create
>
> This patch adds the missing variables to be substitued by the configure
> script.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz
Applie
On 09/08/2011 07:12 PM, Nikhil Handigol wrote:
> It is indeed the case:
>
> $ type lxc-attach
> lxc-attach is /usr/local/bin/lxc-attach
Ok.
Did you specified the kernel source tree when invoking configure ?
It is the --with-linuxdir=
Make sure to remove src/lxc/setns.h file which is automatical
On 09/08/2011 06:48 PM, Nikhil Handigol wrote:
> Just to be sure that wasn't the case, I tried running the executable
> directly from the lxc source directory. I got the same error:
>
> $ cd src/lxc
> $ ./lxc-execute -n foo -f /etc/mn/host.conf -- /bin/bash
> root@mnhost:/home/nikhilh/lxc/src/lxc#
On 09/08/2011 06:30 PM, Nikhil Handigol wrote:
> I just tried running lxc-attach with linux-2.6.38. I got the same error as
> with linux-3.0 -- Function not implemented - failed to set namespace 'pid'.
>
> Here's the exact sequence of steps that I followed:
>
> Compiled linux-2.6.38.2 with the corr
On 09/08/2011 02:12 PM, sfrazt wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano schrieb am 8.09.11 13:56:
>>> My question is now: Where does this filename came from? Is it
>>> a security hole?
>>>
>> Is it possible that's coming from an environment variable ?
> You are absolut
On 09/07/2011 10:06 AM, sfrazt wrote:
> hi,
>
> i run lxc under debian sid with lxc version 0.7.5.1.
> I run a debian like system in lxc container and vnc4server inside.
> Therefor i
> have created a user.
>
> The effect is that. If i start vnc4user manually as user with
>
On 09/07/2011 07:49 PM, Goran Cetusic wrote:
> Thank you, Daniel. If lxc-attach enters the mainline kernels it will, with
> the LANA netgraph implementation, become a powerful tool for network
> simulation. The only component inside the kernel that is still missing are
> union mounts.
Yes, the ker
On 09/07/2011 11:33 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 10:38 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/07/2011 02:17 AM, Nikhil Handigol wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have been facing problems getting lxc (more specifically, lxc-attach) to
>>> work
On 09/07/2011 02:17 AM, Nikhil Handigol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been facing problems getting lxc (more specifically, lxc-attach) to
> work on Linux v3.1.0-rc4. When I run lxc-attach, I get the following error:
> $ lxc-attach -n foo -- /bin/bash
> lxc-attach: No such file or directory - failed to op
On 09/01/2011 02:00 PM, rha...@informatiq.org wrote:
> From: InformatiQ
>
>
> Signed-off-by: InformatiQ
> ---
Applied.
--
Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE!
Finally, a world-class log management solutio
On 08/28/2011 01:00 PM, Ramez Hanna wrote:
> * if not running on fedora host amd -R is not set, use fedora 14 as default
> * trap SIGHUP SIGINT SIGTERM, and cleanup before exiting
>
Applied.
--
Special Offer -- Download Ar
On 08/30/2011 05:36 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Thanks. No objections to the patchset. (Other than, better to simply
> remove the code lines which you commented out - but no need for a new
> set for that).
>
> I haven't tested it, but it looks correct.
>
> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn
Applied.
---
On 08/28/2011 12:59 PM, Ramez Hanna wrote:
> templates/lxc-fedora.in | 10 +-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Applied. Thanks.
Ramez, I had to fix the diff file, please look at git send-email ... :)
---
On 08/24/2011 04:06 PM, 陈竞 wrote:
> i have a computer with 2 cores cpu. I want to create a container with 0.5
> cpu. I found that cpuset.shares means how many time cpu time it get,
> but i don't know whether cpuset.shares point to one cpu or all cpu?
> if it points to one cpu, is the following con
On 08/19/2011 12:37 PM, Guillaume ZITTA wrote:
> Hello,
>
> lxc-start can handle log output and console output, cool.
> But one day or another, we'll have to rotate them.
>
> Is there a know solution ?
> Btw, is there a (easy) way to log into syslog?
Did you try with -o /dev/kmsg ?
--
On 08/15/2011 10:05 PM, Gary Ballantyne wrote:
> On 16/08/11 06:52, Andre Nathan wrote:
>> Hi Gary
>>
>> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 06:38 +1200, Gary Ballantyne wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, I am still getting the same errors with a little over 40
>>> containers.
>> I also had this problem. It was solved af
On 08/13/2011 01:54 PM, John wrote:
> I've just replaced my "lxc" package with "lxc-git" and it's working
> again. Many thanks.
> (my installed "lxc" package was probably one version stale also, which
> was most likely the problem)
>
> I guess there's been a change in the kernel. before seeing yo
On 08/12/2011 11:51 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> hi!
>
> I'm asking you about limiting memory.
>
> This is the test config:
> lxc.cgroup.memory.limit_in_bytes = 16M
> lxc.cgroup.memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes = 1G
> lxc.cgroup.cpuset.cpus = 0-1
> lxc.cgroup.cpu.shares = 1024
>
> I run apt-get upgrade and a
On 08/12/2011 11:00 PM, sfrazt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i want to to have a application container that acts with memory limits
> as there is simple no more memory. Means: if it reaches the limit the
> next question for more memory should simple be denied.
>
> The default behaviour is to kill the applicatio
On 08/12/2011 08:57 AM, zorg wrote:
[ ... ]
>> P.S. I believe the fies to make cifs and p9 work already went in, and
>> FUSE already did, but it's been a while and I'll have to retest. (I
>> know I got 'em all to work, I _think_ all changes necessary to do so
>> went upstream.) If you're not t
floading capabilities of the
interface before creating the container.
Anyway, it seems you hit this bug:
commit 79b569f0ec53a14c4d71e79d93a8676d9a0fda6d
Author: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Wed Mar 30 02:42:17 2011 -0700
netdev: fix mtu check when TSO is enabled
In case the device where is co
On 08/10/2011 06:56 PM, Remi Verchere wrote:
>>> So, how can I migrate a container configuration managed by lxc tools
>>> to libvirt ? Is there any tools or how-to?
>> No. That could be very nice if we write a driver for libvirt for the lxc
>> tools.
>> If someone is willing to do that, that would
On 08/10/2011 05:54 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 04:51 PM, Mauras Olivier wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have several containers running on a host - ~10
>> One of them is running a MySQL database. Several of the others are running
>> php code under apache t
On 08/10/2011 05:54 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[ ... ]
> Can you check with tcpdump if there are problems with the patch
> checksums ?
gah !
s/patch/packet
--
uberSVN's rich system and user administration c
On 08/10/2011 04:51 PM, Mauras Olivier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have several containers running on a host - ~10
> One of them is running a MySQL database. Several of the others are running
> php code under apache that fetch datas from the database.
>
> Host is using eth0, while my containers are on
On 08/10/2011 12:02 PM, Remi Verchere wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using 2 debian LXC containers, and it works fine. I use default
> cgroups configuration, and I manage containers using the lxc-* tools.
>
> I want to manage them using some pretty frontend, such as Archipel
> (http://archipelproject.org/
On 08/10/2011 09:21 AM, Ramez Hanna wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/08/2011 10:54 AM, Ramez Hanna wrote:
>>> >From c117fc7051971a9166cf5ab1f85cb6331b91a78c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: InformatiQ
>>> Date: Wed,
1 - 100 of 618 matches
Mail list logo
