On 07/01/2011 03:05 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 09:01 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:12 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 06/27/2011 03:53 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
Cool. I now have it running in 3 environments. Two are Fedora
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 09:01 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:12 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 06/27/2011 03:53 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > Cool. I now have it running in 3 environments. Two are Fedora 12 (I
> > > know, I know, it's on my todo list) i686
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:12 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/27/2011 03:53 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Cool. I now have it running in 3 environments. Two are Fedora 12 (I
> > know, I know, it's on my todo list) i686 systems with single cgroup
> > mounts while the other is my Fedora 15 x
On 06/27/2011 03:53 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Cool. I now have it running in 3 environments. Two are Fedora 12 (I
> know, I know, it's on my todo list) i686 systems with single cgroup
> mounts while the other is my Fedora 15 x86_64 platform. All are running
> quite smoothly and lxc-info is
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 18:49 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 14:00 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > >
> > > Thanks, Michael, good catch.
> > >
> > > > > Now wait a m
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 14:00 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> >
> > Thanks, Michael, good catch.
> >
> > > > Now wait a minute. Is that a typo here:
> >
> > No it's not, but:
> >
> > > > char
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 14:00 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
>
> Thanks, Michael, good catch.
>
> > > Now wait a minute. Is that a typo here:
>
> No it's not, but:
>
> > > char *s = index(retbuf, '.');
> > >
> > > If you're doing, in effect, a
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
Thanks, Michael, good catch.
> > Now wait a minute. Is that a typo here:
No it's not, but:
> > char *s = index(retbuf, '.');
> >
> > If you're doing, in effect, a dirname here should that be this:
> >
> > char *s = index(retbuf, '/');
> >
> >
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 13:56 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Looking at the sources and Serge's patch...
>
> On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 13:33 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 18:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > On 06/26/2011 05:52 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> >
Looking at the sources and Serge's patch...
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 13:33 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 18:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 06/26/2011 05:52 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 17:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >> On 06
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 18:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/26/2011 05:52 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 17:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 06/26/2011 05:06 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >>> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > cd /sys/fs/
On 06/26/2011 05:52 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 17:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 06/26/2011 05:06 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> cd /sys/fs/cgroup
>for d in `/bin/ls`; do
> echo 1 > $d/cgrou
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 17:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/26/2011 05:06 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> >>> cd /sys/fs/cgroup
> >>>for d in `/bin/ls`; do
> >>> echo 1 > $d/cgroup.clone_children
> >>>done
> >>
> >> Doing this st
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 10:06 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > > cd /sys/fs/cgroup
> > >for d in `/bin/ls`; do
> > > echo 1 > $d/cgroup.clone_children
> > >done
> >
> > Doing this step alone broke lxc totally for me, with or without
On 06/26/2011 05:06 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
>>> cd /sys/fs/cgroup
>>>for d in `/bin/ls`; do
>>> echo 1 > $d/cgroup.clone_children
>>>done
>>
>> Doing this step alone broke lxc totally for me, with or without the
>> patch below. Th
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > cd /sys/fs/cgroup
> >for d in `/bin/ls`; do
> > echo 1 > $d/cgroup.clone_children
> >done
>
> Doing this step alone broke lxc totally for me, with or without the
> patch below. This was on Fedora 15 testing with lxc 0.7.4.2 as wel
On 06/25/2011 08:19 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 20:05 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 06/24/2011 07:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>> I.e. with systemd or libcgroup.
>>>
>>> To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or
>>> otherwise taking the first cgro
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 20:05 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/24/2011 07:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > I.e. with systemd or libcgroup.
> >
> > To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or
> > otherwise taking the first cgroup we find, we actually create a
> > container in ever
On 06/24/2011 07:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> I.e. with systemd or libcgroup.
>
> To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or
> otherwise taking the first cgroup we find, we actually create a
> container in every mounted cgroup fs. Right now it's done under the
> root of each fs.
Serge,
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 12:54 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> I.e. with systemd or libcgroup.
>
> To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or
> otherwise taking the first cgroup we find, we actually create a
> container in every mounted cgroup fs. Right now it's done under t
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 12:54 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> I.e. with systemd or libcgroup.
> To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or
> otherwise taking the first cgroup we find, we actually create a
> container in every mounted cgroup fs. Right now it's done under the
> root
I.e. with systemd or libcgroup.
To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or
otherwise taking the first cgroup we find, we actually create a
container in every mounted cgroup fs. Right now it's done under the
root of each fs. We may want to put that under lxc, or, better yet,
ma
22 matches
Mail list logo
