Re: [Lxc-users] [lxc-devel] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-25 Thread Nigel McNie
Hi Daniel, Suno, list. I am happy for my efforts to be pillaged and merged with a unified effort. Just let me know where to look. I might be able to contribute some effort over time, though I'm not using containers day-to-day any more. Hopefully as lxc improves, I'll be able to change back :) Re

Re: [Lxc-users] [lxc-devel] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-25 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 01:01 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: : - Snip... > FOUND IT! > [r...@alcove ~]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/accept_ra > 1 > r...@ubuntu:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/accept_ra > 0 > That's what was killing me and blocking autoconf in Debian. I set that > to 1

Re: [Lxc-users] [lxc-devel] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-25 Thread Suno Ano
Mike> I don't want to start a flame war but, honestly, I feel that one Mike> follows the other. I have used Debian (vanilla, Knoppix, and Mike> Ubuntu) and even spun a custom distro based on Knoppix and I am Mike> not at all surprised that, if you are with Debian, you find Mike> bridges annoying. I

Re: [Lxc-users] [lxc-devel] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-24 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 02:18 +0100, Michael Holzt wrote: > > I just find the whole networking model in Debian to be frustrating. It > > is probably the number 1 primary reason why I don't use Debian more and > > won't be incorporating it into future projects. > Now, this is really offtopic on thi

Re: [Lxc-users] [lxc-devel] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-24 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Suno, On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 23:27 +0100, Suno Ano wrote: > Combining forces would be great. I just took a glance at > https://sourceforge.net/projects/lxc-provider/ and the thing that sprung > my eyes are > > - it is a bit Ubuntu focused as it is coded right now > - assumes using a bridge i.e.

Re: [Lxc-users] [lxc-devel] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-24 Thread Suno Ano
Combining forces would be great. I just took a glance at https://sourceforge.net/projects/lxc-provider/ and the thing that sprung my eyes are - it is a bit Ubuntu focused as it is coded right now - assumes using a bridge i.e. also lxc.network.type=veth So, I am with Debian and in favor of macvl

Re: [Lxc-users] [lxc-devel] Request for inclusion into mainline LXC utils

2010-01-24 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Suno Ano wrote: > Hi folks, > > when cloning from [0], there are a bunch of excellent tools like for > example lxc-status. What about including those into mainline lxc utils? > > > [0] git clone git://git.nigel.mcnie.name/lxc-debian.git Hi guys, there is people writing tools to create the cont