Re: [Lxc-users] FUSE and capabilities

2011-02-16 Thread Trent W. Buck
Milan Zamazal writes: >> "TWB" == Trent W Buck writes: > > TWB> I suppose if I had to support desktop wank, I would set up a > TWB> udev rule on the host to mount removable devices in > TWB> /media/, and then rbind-mount /media into the > TWB> container(s). > > This might

Re: [Lxc-users] FUSE and capabilities

2011-02-15 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "TWB" == Trent W Buck writes: TWB> I suppose if I had to support desktop wank, I would set up a TWB> udev rule on the host to mount removable devices in TWB> /media/, and then rbind-mount /media into the TWB> container(s). This might be a good idea for some systems, but

Re: [Lxc-users] FUSE and capabilities

2011-02-14 Thread Trent W. Buck
Milan Zamazal writes: > I tried to use FUSE/EncFS in a container on a Debian 6.0 machine and > I've found I have to enable CAP_SYS_ADMIN in order to make it work. > Without it, permission error is reported on encfs invocation (and yes, > I've got /dev/fuse enabled in lxc.cgroup.devices.allow, it

Re: [Lxc-users] FUSE and capabilities

2011-02-14 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 02/14/2011 04:41 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote: > I tried to use FUSE/EncFS in a container on a Debian 6.0 machine and > I've found I have to enable CAP_SYS_ADMIN in order to make it work. > Without it, permission error is reported on encfs invocation (and yes, > I've got /dev/fuse enabled in lxc.cgro

[Lxc-users] FUSE and capabilities

2011-02-14 Thread Milan Zamazal
I tried to use FUSE/EncFS in a container on a Debian 6.0 machine and I've found I have to enable CAP_SYS_ADMIN in order to make it work. Without it, permission error is reported on encfs invocation (and yes, I've got /dev/fuse enabled in lxc.cgroup.devices.allow, it wouldn't work without it even wi