On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 00:40 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2010, at 12:17 AM, "Trent W. Buck"
> wrote:
>
> > Upstream cgroup documentation uses /dev/cgroup. I would appreciate a
> > udev rules.d file that creates and mounts a cgroup there; I haven't
> > gotten around to writing o
C Anthony Risinger writes:
> On Nov 29, 2010, at 12:17 AM, "Trent W. Buck"
> wrote:
>
>> Upstream cgroup documentation uses /dev/cgroup. I would appreciate a
>> udev rules.d file that creates and mounts a cgroup there; I haven't
>> gotten around to writing one
>
> docs lagging; upstream does th
On Nov 29, 2010, at 12:17 AM, "Trent W. Buck"
wrote:
> Upstream cgroup documentation uses /dev/cgroup. I would appreciate a
> udev rules.d file that creates and mounts a cgroup there; I haven't
> gotten around to writing one
docs lagging; upstream does this for us now:
/sys/fs/cgroup
http://
"Brian K. White" writes:
> On 11/8/2010 1:14 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 08:40 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>> Quoting Walter Stanish (walter.stan...@saffrondigital.com):
http://lxc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lxc/lxc;a=commitdiff_plain;h=c01d62f21b21ba
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 14:45 -0500, Brian K. White wrote:
> Why in the world would you want to break the ability to safely back up
> just /etc and know that you got practically everything needed to
> re-create a server without having to back up the entire server full of
> redundant junk that wou
On 11/8/2010 1:14 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 08:40 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Walter Stanish (walter.stan...@saffrondigital.com):
>>> http://lxc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lxc/lxc;a=commitdiff_plain;h=c01d62f21b21ba6c2b8b78ab3c2b37cc8f8fd265
>>
>>
Glad to see some further discussion.
> Personally, I like and use /srv/lxc for my VMs and don't see any
> conflict with the FHS. It is, after all, a site local configuration
> sort of thing that gets set up when you build the images and comprises,
> potentially, entire FHS-like sub hierarchies fo
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 08:40 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Walter Stanish (walter.stan...@saffrondigital.com):
> > http://lxc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lxc/lxc;a=commitdiff_plain;h=c01d62f21b21ba6c2b8b78ab3c2b37cc8f8fd265
>
> This commit only moves the location of the 'templat
Quoting Walter Stanish (walter.stan...@saffrondigital.com):
> > > Therefore I humbly propose:
> > > - the establishment of /var/lib/lxc as the default top-level
> > > directory for guest filesystems
> > AFAICS we are still using /var/cache/lxc right now.
>
> Hrrm interesting, I haven't seen that
> > Therefore I humbly propose:
> > - the establishment of /var/lib/lxc as the default top-level
> > directory for guest filesystems
> AFAICS we are still using /var/cache/lxc right now.
Hrrm interesting, I haven't seen that come through on my
distribution's packages (gentoo).
Quick survey - what
Quoting Walter Stanish (walter.stan...@saffrondigital.com):
> http://lxc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lxc/lxc;a=commitdiff_plain;h=c01d62f21b21ba6c2b8b78ab3c2b37cc8f8fd265
This commit only moves the location of the 'templates', which are
just scripts that install a guest fs. It doesn't/sh
Hi all,
I have been playing with LXC on and off for a few months now. It's
great. Thanks so much to all developers and the wider user community
for making yet another powerful set of functionality available to the
free world! :)
Now that's out of the way...
One higher-level issue I see at pres
Hi all,
I have been playing with LXC on and off for a few months now. It's
great. Thanks so much to all developers and the wider user community
for making yet another powerful set of functionality available to the
free world! :)
Now that's out of the way...
One higher-level issue I see at pres
13 matches
Mail list logo
