2013/8/11 PCMan
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:14 AM, christ...@surlykke.dk
> wrote:
> > Hi everybody
> >
> > I've taken the liberty of creating a new module - 'lxqt-powermanagement'
> in
> > lxqt on github. It contains all the code from the old razor-autosuspend
> and
> > razor-screenlocker. I've
Based on Razor-Qt licensing policies that I read, the author of Razor-Qt
prefer LGPL over GPL.
How the merge of LXDE and Razor-Qt will affect the future of LXDE-Qt? Will
it also prefer LGPL over GPL.
I suggest both developers should consider it earlier before everything get
more complicated.
My op
On 13-08-11 05:01 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Sunday, 2013-08-11, Stephan Sokolow wrote:
>>
>> The latter. libappindicator does do an automatic XEmbed fallback which
>> some applications rely on but it locks you into the Unity-like behaviour
>> I mentioned before.
>
> Ah, interesting, I would h
On Sunday, 2013-08-11, Stephan Sokolow wrote:
> On 13-08-11 12:22 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > Sounds to me like the GTK world needing something like KStatusNotifier,
> > which encapsulates traditional XEmbed icon and D-Bus interface so
> > application developers don't have to do that all by themse
On 13-08-11 12:22 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
>
> Sounds to me like the GTK world needing something like KStatusNotifier, which
> encapsulates traditional XEmbed icon and D-Bus interface so application
> developers don't have to do that all by themselves.
>
> However, I admit that I don't know anyth
On Sunday, 2013-08-11, Stephan Sokolow wrote:
> My main concern is that there are a lot of GTK+ apps out there and, if
> that's not a KDE-specific extension, then it may require convincing each
> developer to buy into using something other than libindicate since it
> doesn't seem to provide a way t
On Sunday, 2013-08-11, Stephan Sokolow wrote:
> On 13-08-11 06:25 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I see.
> > I guess there is very little point in using a wrapper library written for
> > a different tool stack, basically using an abstraction that can easily
> > be achieved directly using the tools at
On 13-08-11 06:25 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> I see.
> I guess there is very little point in using a wrapper library written for a
> different tool stack, basically using an abstraction that can easily be
> achieved directly using the tools at hand (qdbusxml2cpp).
>
> [...]
>
> Sure, but it is al
My main concern is that there are a lot of GTK+ apps out there and, if
that's not a KDE-specific extension, then it may require convincing each
developer to buy into using something other than libindicate since it
doesn't seem to provide a way to access it in the manner you described.
The AppIn
On Sunday, 2013-08-11, Stephan Sokolow wrote:
> On 13-08-10 09:48 PM, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
> >> 2. Audacious Media Player (Not everyone uses the global keybindings
> >> plugin to toggle main window visibility like I do, I wouldn't want to
> >> HAVE to take my hand off the mouse to toggle vis
On Sunday, 2013-08-11, Stephan Sokolow wrote:
> On 13-08-10 01:07 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I am not sure how it does it exactly but it definitely does it.
> > E.g. left clicking the Amarok icon toggles main window visiblity and
> > Amarok is using KSystemNotifierItem for its tray integration.
>
On Sunday, 2013-08-11, Stephan Sokolow wrote:
> As far as I can tell, libappindicator (which most
> appindicator-supporting applications use since it gives them a tray icon
> fallback for free if the panel doesn't support appindicators) doesn't
> provide an API to allow applications to register sep
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:14 AM, christ...@surlykke.dk
wrote:
> Hi everybody
>
> I've taken the liberty of creating a new module - 'lxqt-powermanagement' in
> lxqt on github. It contains all the code from the old razor-autosuspend and
> razor-screenlocker. I've done some reorganisation: razor-auto
13 matches
Mail list logo
