--help,
> -v --version and if feaseble a usage cli output. Esp. the --version
> thing could
> help us a lot if we put the liblxqt-version, Qt-Version and other
> relevant data
> in it.
>
> Cheers Alf
>
> On 10.12.2016 16:44, PCMan wrote:
>> I plan to release pcmanfm-qt a
I plan to release pcmanfm-qt and libfm-qt recently.
This can be a major release since it brings several new features and
API changes.
About libfm, when to release is up to its current maintainer Andriy
and I don't plan to touch it.
Having the same release cycle with the whole LXQt seems to be a goo
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> You have written on Saturday, 26 November, at 21:02:
>>On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Andrej N. Gritsenko
>>wrote:
>
>>> I have an objection on including new features and string changes into
>>> libfm 1.2.x rel
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> You have written on Saturday, 26 November, at 16:56:
>>Recently there were some improvements in pcmanfm-qt and libfm-qt,
>>including the new button-style path bar and simple emblem support. So
>>I'd suggest making a new r
Hello,
Recently there were some improvements in pcmanfm-qt and libfm-qt,
including the new button-style path bar and simple emblem support. So
I'd suggest making a new release for these components.
Any objections or issues?
BTW, I'm not sure how to update the strings in *.ts files given the
current
Hello,
I took some time to perform some benchmarks for LXQt 0.11.
The result is quite satisfactory. After cold boot in Debian testing,
only 112 MB of RAM is used.
This is even slightly less than the usage of XFCE.
FYI, I shared the detailed results in reddit and LXDE blogs.
*
https://www.reddit.co
Hello,
I just released pcmanfm-qt 0.11.0.
Thank you very much.
--
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://p
Welcome!
Please keep up your good work on hacking the file manager. lol
Cheers!
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Hi list
>
> Please give Nicolas Miller a warm welcome as our newest addition to
> the team. He has been focusing on PCManFM-Qt and libfm-qt. He is
> @npmill
Hello,
After the release of libfm-qt 0.11.0, I merged the remaining PRs of
pcmanfm-qt.
There is only one PR left. After that, I'll make a new release for it.
If there are still some critical bugs which should block the release,
please tell me.
Cheers!
--
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Shall we target 2016-01-15 for the release?
>
If there are no critical issues, that will be good.
Cheers!
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Olivier Duchateau
> wrote:
> > 2016-01-08 11:29 GMT+01:00 PCMan :
&
Hello,
Since there are many important bug fixes for the file manager in git and we
moved the library to its own package, it seems to be a good idea to make a
new release for them. Especially the license of the libfm-qt part is
changed to LGPL recently.
What do you guys think?
Are there any critical
Hello,
After granted permission from all controbutors of the source code of
libfm-qt, I relicensed the library from GPL 2 to LGPL 2.1.
Unfortunately, I was not able to get response from few translators after
waiting for more than one week. So if you're one of them and you do not
agree with the LGPL
Hello,
Thank you for the offer.
Just to let you know that the development of LXDE is not stopped.
The development is currently led by Andriy G.
Both LXQt and LXDE are actively developed.
LXQt seems to be more active at the moment since it has more developers,
though.
Cheers!
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015
Dear LXDE/LXQt project members,
As some of you might have noticed, some of our web services, such as wiki,
blog, and forum are not accessible for weeks. I'll briefly report what
happened and discuss with you about the future of our web hosting.
Previously, these lxde web services are lxc containers
No, I'm also -1 on this one.
Copyright owner and license agreement are different issues.
The license enable users to utilize the code freely.
The copyright owner, however, is the only one who can legally re-license
that piece of code.
Though all parts of the code are under the same license in the
Done!
Thank you for the reminder.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Sérgio Marques
wrote:
> The translations files aren´t updated from sources.
>
> Can you update them?
>
> Regards
>
> 2015-07-10 5:53 GMT+01:00 PCMan :
>
>> Hello,
>> I spent some time workin
Hello,
I spent some time working on obconf-qt today and implemented all of the
missing options.
Now it should support the same openbox options as the original gtk+ version
of obconf.
Some new strings are added so translations are needed.
Then, I'd suggest making a new release for it.
Cheers!
-
I use fcitx in lxqt everyday and can confirm that it works.
You probably have to set proper environment variables.
GTK_IM_MODULE=fcitx
QT_IM_MODULE=fcitx
Make sure you have both of them set.
Besides, you have to install the ui module of fcitx.
Cheers!
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:20 AM, peyoot wrot
We should then discuss the aiming of the next
> version
> > (refactoring, performance etc).
> >
> >
> > On 02/09/2015 06:19 AM, PCMan wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Currently, lxqt-panel is the slowest part during desktop login.
> > Here is a proposal
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Monday, 2015-02-09, 16:52:39, PCMan wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > > On Monday, 2015-02-09, 04:07:04, PCMan wrote:
> > > > OK, a list of main features I plan to
Hello,
Currently, lxqt-panel is the slowest part during desktop login.
Here is a proposal to speed up the startup of lxqt-panel
(we used the same techniques in lxpanel gtk+ version).
Since some of the plugins are so frequently used and have no additional
dependencies, it's a good idea to statical
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Monday, 2015-02-09, 04:07:04, PCMan wrote:
> > OK, a list of main features I plan to use.
> > 1. auto
> > 2. nullptr
> > 3. new range based for() loop for iterating over containers
>
> One thing to keep l
OK, a list of main features I plan to use.
1. auto
2. nullptr
3. new range based for() loop for iterating over containers
4. lambda
5. smart pointers
6. move semantics/r value reference
7. override keyword (optional)
8. raw string literals
9. initializer list
10. delegating constructors
--
Hello,
Since we have 0.9 released, I'd like to discuss about starting using C++ 11.
Some time ago we had some discussions on the issue tracker but we did not
get feedback from some developers yet.
Please see https://github.com/lxde/lxqt/issues/434 .
So I'd like to ask if it's OK to start using C++
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Workload is high, but I'm usually not a code contributor to LXQt so it
> doesn't affect me as much. Still, with arch linux packaging duties on
> top, I will eventually need someone else to pick up the slack.
>
> I did commit my release sc
I just wrote a blog entry about performance tips.
http://blog.lxde.org/?p=1333
Cheers!
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot
e early, release often!" is good only if it's not broken.
I don't want to hear the users say "LXQt is good, but it's not stable".
Our project is not just a toy.
We want to build software for production use.
So, let's fix them. :-)
Cheers!
> 2015-01-28 20:02
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Jerome Leclanche
wrote:
> Alright guys, the milestone is almost there. The release target is
> still 29th of January and we're right on track. Unfortunately, panel
> task grouping had to be dropped as it was just in too poor a state.
>
> PCM
Hello,
I just removed QtXdg from the dependency of pcmanfm-qt.
Currently the lib is only used for changing the desktop dir.
Avoiding loading a library might potentially speed up dynamic linking.
So I replaced that part with some simple regexp and removed the dependency.
Packagers, please remove lib
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Alexis Lopez Zubieta
wrote:
> Hello friends:
> I would like to discuss with you the future of the lxqt-panel systemTray.
> As you must know the traditional implementation is made using xembed this
> is no longer supported in Wayland or Mir. Now the KDE (1) and Ubu
Hello,
Some status updates about myself.
I quit my job several months ago and went back to a university for studying
"computer science" as a graduate. :-)
Since I've never received any formal CS training in the past, I'd like to
have some.
The good news is I might be able to do programming better (
More on this topic. I also did benchmarks using strace.
First, I dropped all caches by doing echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches.
Then I used strace to trace all of the child processes of sddm, and then
login.
This is the result I got.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4BhmC8V2mivMGFRS3BCeFk0ZTQ/vie
Hi,
As promised, I started some work on benchmarks.
The first issue is slow startup of lxqt.
Previously I tried to develop my own tool until I realize that bootchart
actully does this perfectly well.
So, I add this command to the beginning of /usr/bin/startlxqt.
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-bootchart
> This is a known issue: https://github.com/lxde/lxqt/issues/101
it's on our TODO list.
>> - drag an drop of programs to desktop from program menu
> Any form of editing of the main menu is much harder than it looks, but
> this is a known issue as well.
Please file a bug for it and a
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> 20.10.2014 21:57, PCMan:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Eugene Pivnev
>> wrote:
>>
>>> * lxqt-policykit - make install not works (how you were testing it befor
>>> release?)
>>
&g
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> 19.10.2014 01:03, Kolmar Kafran пишет:
>> I'm sodisappointed with the six linux desktop environment available.
>> I' m very
>> anxious to try LxQt 0.8.0; has anyone succeeded to install it on
>> Fedora 20?
>
> So - current state:
> https://b
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Pierre Gobin wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Andrej N. Gritsenko made really fantastic work on PCManFM in recent times.
>
> I would like to know if we could hope that PCManFM-Qt could make use of
> these improvements in future releases or if its development is totally
> inde
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:22 PM, john maverick
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'm not an active developer, just a reader that occasionally visits this list
> for news.
>
> PCMan was testing the MoonlightDE and said it would post some results about
> it soon. For me, the "
I think Jerome has access to it?
Previously brother handles this, but he left the project already.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The http://lxde.org/download still have obsolete links to the GIT
> which point to sourceforge while actual GIT is at
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Luís Pereira
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:59 AM, PCMan wrote:
>> I totally understand your purpose, but we don't really want to provide
>> co-installable binaries for both versions. It just does not make any
>> sense for the users
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:56 AM, PCMan wrote:
> Well, no new inputs form other developers so far.
> I have a new proposal which is not perfect but partially solve the problem.
> Luis, please see if this solution is acceptable for you.
>
> 1. Use /usr/share/lxqt for both Qt4 a
Well, no new inputs form other developers so far.
I have a new proposal which is not perfect but partially solve the problem.
Luis, please see if this solution is acceptable for you.
1. Use /usr/share/lxqt for both Qt4 and Qt5 build by default
2. All components use the data dir specified by liblxq
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Just to be clear: Qt4 LXQt *is* abandonware. 0.8 officially still
> support Qt4 but it will be dropped very soon after the release. If it
> has bugs, barring a 0.8.1 release there will not be any fixes for
> specifically qt4...
> J. Leclanc
Hello,
We should have released LXQt 0.8 last weekend, but it's blocked by an
issue related to translations and data files.
Now some translations and data files are installed to /usr/share/lxqt,
while others are installed to /usr/share/lxqt-qt5.
This inconsistency breaks some translations.
The /usr/
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paulo Lieuthier
wrote:
> Hello developers and contributors,
>
> I'm porting LXQt to KWindowSystem, and it's lookg nice so far, even though
> KWindowSystem is not 100% complete. I've ported lxqt-panel entirely, except
> for the keyboard indicator and the system tray
Udisks and Udisks2 have always been problematic for quite a long time.
PCManFM only calls gvfs which in turns calls udisks2 to mount your device.
We did not do any other things. Udisks2 controlled everything.
All the mount options and the mount path are controlled by it.
Even worse, there is no off
Hello,
Here're some news about LXQt 0.8.
1. Thanks to the hard work of Luis, now libqtxdg can use the new
QMimeDatabase and drop libmagic. He's updating the other components to
adopt the changes. After the related PRs are all merged, libqtxdg is
ready for a new release.
2. Welcome to our new deve
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
> Dear LXQt folks,
>
> I am exciting about the LXQt 0.8 release. Debian Jessie, the next stable
> version of Debian, is going to be frozen on November 5th this year [1],
> which is in about two months. I saw that there is an ITP (intent to
> pack
Hello,
As mentioned previously, lxqt-config-randr has some unresolved problems.
We probably need some alternatives for LXQt 0.8 release.
Since there were no other comments or objections, we continue this part.
Thanks to the work of P L. Lucas, now we have lxqt-config-monitor, an
much improved versi
Hello,
We have been quiet for some time, but the git repos are actually busy.
Recently most of the important bugs marked as 0.8 milestones are cleared.
Besides, pcmanfm-qt and lxqt-panel also got some serious polishing.
So I think it's the right time to start the preparation of 0.8 release.
Current
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Luís Pereira
wrote:
> Hi everybody:
> libqtxdg is still using libmagic as the mimetypes provider.
> Qt5 has mimetypes support: the QMimeDatabase and QMimeType classes.
> QMimeDatabase is cached.
>
> Qt4 has no real mimetype support. I found QtMimeTypes, the father
lated to desktop
manager and panel.
We definitely have to fix that before 0.8 release.
> You (PCMan) wrote lxrandr-qt:
>
> https://github.com/PCMan/lxrandr-qt
Yes, but I deprecated that and start using lxqt-config-randr instead.
The UI of lxqt-config-randr just looks nicer and it's featur
Since lxqt-lightdm-greeter is not ported to Qt5, you need the Qt4
version of liblxqt for it. The reason not to create a Qt5 port for it
is because sddm, another nice and well-maintained lightweight display
manager.
We suggest using that.
However, if many people still want to use the lightdm greeter
Hello,
I just noted that lxqt-config-randr is broken.
When I plugged in an external monitor, set set its content a clone of
my laptop's monitor, it failed to work.
My external monitor became blank and only showed a cursor.
If I restart X11, and do the same using the command "xrandr --output
VGA-0 -
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 6:54 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:03:53 -0700
> Luís Pereira wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Hernán Ramírez wrote:
>>
>> > I also got this bug, but in my case it was in the second restart. I have
>> > Ubuntu Mini 14.04 "only the base system" + LXQT R
A little bit off topic but I think this is very important.
The CppMicroService library is using Apache license.
Other LXQt components or MoonLight components derived from LXQt are
using LGPL and GPL 2, which are not compatible with Apache license.
Apache is GPL "3" compatible, but it's not compatib
Some updates.
Instead of doing some experiment, I tried to test MoonLightDE since it
did quite similar things.
However, I failed to get all of the components compiled correctly.
I'll try to fix them when I have time to see how it performs.
After a quick skim of the source code of MoonLightDE, I not
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Alexis López Zubieta
wrote:
> Hello:
> I have experienced the same issue when PCmanFm was integrated to the
> "core" of MoonLight. I'm not a senior programer but by my little
> experience when an application that doesn't perform any complex
> calculation takes to l
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:45 PM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> And thanks for your hard work on LXxx.
>
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 11:15:57AM +0800, PCMan wrote:
>> Last time I did the test for LXQt Qt4, it used 37 MB more than
>> openbox. Now it increased a little (3MB). Of cour
Hello,
I just did some benchmarks for the new Qt5-based LXQt.
I did it on the same Debian virtual machine with minimal setup.
After cold boot, the results were as follows:
1. Plain openbox without other apps: 69 MB
2. XFCE: 105 MB
3. LXDE (gtk+2): 89 MB
4: LXQt (Qt5): 109 MB (more than XFCE!!)
Last
org/git/lxde/$_pkgname.git
>> >
>> > is that right ?
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-07-01 10:22 GMT+02:00 Martin Gräßlin :
>> >>
>> >> On Tuesday 01 July 2014 11:22:00 PCMan wrote:
>> >> > To be honest, Qt5 is not as excit
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Alexis López Zubieta
wrote:
> Hello friends:
> This will be bit long mail, but please take a look a it.
>
> Some time ago we were discussing in this list the possibility of making
> a modular and integrated version of LXDE. For this goal the main
> applications of t
olutely no change. Or it's stocked at another place, or
>> something has been unblocked.
>>
>> (sorry for my bad english)
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Patrice
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-06-29 15:12 GMT+02:00 PCMan :
>
ome little changes, but nothing bad for the moment.
>>
>> Great work, thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-06-28 19:30 GMT+02:00 Jerome Leclanche :
>>
>>> Everything is merged in now!
>>>
>>> I'm updating the AUR packages to use Qt5.
Hello,
I just ported the remaining small pieces of LXQt to Qt5.
Now I'm running a full Qt5 LXQt desktop.
Please see the Qt5 status page for more detail.
https://github.com/lxde/lxde-qt/wiki/The-Status-of-Qt5-Porting
Some changes are still in pull requests and haven't been merged yet.
So please hel
Although I finally made the systray plugin work, I found a severe
issue last night.
Due to a regression bug in Qt5, the NETWM Dock type is not set on the panel.
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-39887
So the panel will be hidden when the user try to minimize all windows;
e.g. it's trea
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Alexis López Zubieta
wrote:
> Great news, It's a shame that my code were useless I will do it better
> next time :D.
No, it's not a shame. You did a good job.
I read your patches to see how to fix the plugin parts since I don't
really know how to do that.
Your bra
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Thursday 26 June 2014 18:31:06 PCMan wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:56 PM, PCMan wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > I have some good news again.
>> > I just started porting lxqt-panel to qt5 and it&#x
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:56 PM, PCMan wrote:
> Hello,
> I have some good news again.
> I just started porting lxqt-panel to qt5 and it's nearly finished now.
> Previously Alexis Lopez Zubieta contributed some code in this area.
> However, the naming of headers and s
Hello,
I have some good news again.
I just started porting lxqt-panel to qt5 and it's nearly finished now.
Previously Alexis Lopez Zubieta contributed some code in this area.
However, the naming of headers and some APIs are changed dramatically
in the last few months.
Merging azubieta's branch with
Hello,
After Luis finished the porting of lxqt-globalkeys and libsysstat, I
ported lxqt-runner to QT5 today.
Besides, a very basic new platform theme plugin is created for Qt5 already.
Here is a wiki page documenting the progress of Qt5 port.
https://github.com/lxde/lxde-qt/wiki/The-Status-of-Qt5-P
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Hi list
>
> Welcome to our first new dev since the merge, Paulo Lieuthier :)
> https://github.com/paulolieuthier
>
> J. Leclanche
Welcome Paulo!
Really glad that you can join us.
I'm on a vacation and is traveling now.
So I'm not able to
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Marcio Lopes de Faria
wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I've installed the lxqt compiling from source in a chroot environment where
> I have installed the archlinux.
>
> I use the old lxde in this environment without any problem, but I hadn't the
> same success with lxqt.
>
Hi,
Luis and I are working on the Qt5 port recently.
Now liblxqt and libqtxdg can be built with qt5.
Besides, new LXQt header names are used for all components.
We already have half of the components built with Qt5.
I created a wiki page to document the status of components.
https://github.com/lxd
There is an unresolved known bug preventing the compile of qtwayland
on ArchLinux. After the release of qt 5.3, this is still not fixed.
I tried to compile qtwayland against the qt 5.3 package in testing
repo of arch but it failed to link properly.
Please see the relevant bug report.
https://bugs.a
Hello,
As promised, I started to work on the Qt5 port of liblxqt. I took some
time to merge the changes done by gilir into the qt5 branch of
liblxqt.
See: https://github.com/lxde/liblxqt/tree/qt5
The following new changes are done.
1. Retain the old lib name liblxqt4 and liblxqt5. (I proposed usin
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:11 PM, PCMan wrote:
> Hello,
> I just added lxqt-admin, a new package for system admin tools.
> It's based on liboobs and system-tool-backends (cross-platform &
> desktop independent)
>
> Currently, there are only two tools.
> * lxqt-a
Hello list,
Seems that we got a new member. :-)
A developer Richard wants to join LXQt.
So, Richard, which parts of the desktop are you interested in?
Please subscribe to our mailing list and make further discussions there.
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
Cheers!
Hello,
I just added lxqt-admin, a new package for system admin tools.
It's based on liboobs and system-tool-backends (cross-platform &
desktop independent)
Currently, there are only two tools.
* lxqt-admin-time: A tool to configure system date & time (Setting
timezone does not seem to be compatibl
Hello,
I've started to work on the Qt5 migration.
Since Julien has did some work on it, I'll base on his work.
However, there are two remaining problems. Luis, your comments are wanted.
1. qtxdg header names & library names
Julien changed the header file naming in his branch.
https://github.com/gi
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For your information, we are discussing a potential migration from
> LXDE + Gtk applications to a LXQt + Qt environment for Lubuntu. You
> may be interesting in the discussion about the different applications
> for the different use
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Luís Pereira
wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Kuzma Shapran wrote:
>>> 2. Since we don't have consensus, leave the library name liblxqt5 as
>>> it is. This won't affect other components since they all use the
>>> values provided by liblxqt cmake config f
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Julien Lavergne
wrote:
> 2014-05-15 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alexis López Zubieta :
>> Hello everyone:
>> Now I have some free time, have you done something about the issues that
>> PCman point out? I woul like to know in order to get my hands on
> 2. Library names:
> The Sokoloff Qt5 branch change the library name to liblxqt4 for Qt4
> and liblxqt5 for Qt5.
> I think it's better to use liblxqt-qt4 and liblxqt-qt5 because some
> distros append so-version to package name of libs. For example,
> libqtxdg1. The number 1 is from lib version, no
Hello,
I'm willing to work on liblxqt Qt5 port.
Sokoloff already did the most parts.
Julien just fixed the remaining stuff.
If there are no objections, I'd like to continue their work and finish
the Qt5 migration of liblxqt.
Here are some issues to be discussed.
1. Header names:
Sokoloff changed
Hello,
As I promised earlier, here comes more FreeBSD support. :-)
https://github.com/lxde/lxqt-panel/pull/32
This fixed the volume control panel applet and added OSS support.
More review is wanted.
Thanks!
--
"Accelerate
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Alexis López Zubieta
wrote:
> Hello:
> I keep using the Sokoloff's branch, I have ported some components
> successfully but those that relies on Xlib are stalled. While I was
> trying to fix the taskbar also realize that both Xlib and Xcb can work
> together. I did
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-05-09 15:30 GMT+02:00 Jerome Leclanche :
>
>> > 2014-05-09 11:53 GMT+02:00 Jerome Leclanche :
>> >
>> >> The second point is about Qt 5. There's been spiking interest in
>> >> finishing the port and we're actually almost there. A
> Now some "few" bugs have shown up. So i will be busy whit then for a
> wile. If someone wants to try it is available at:
> http://github.com/azubieta/lxqt-panel
>
> At this point I follow the Pcman idea, move into xcb instead of keep
> fighting with xlib. But I'm not v
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Inti Alonso wrote:
> Hi, Im testing LXQT in Manjaro and im loving it.
>
> Im a graphic designer, I want to help with the tranlations and maybe with
> some theming (Spanish) where should I go?
>
Thank you for your support.
We're still in the process of settings up t
ths?
Wouldn't it be better if we can do it?
I have no objections if you want to revert the changes, though.
> I have written on Thursday, 8 May, at 19:07:
>>PCMan has written on Thursday, 8 May, at 23:00:
>>>3. When building libfm, you need --disable-actions option. For unk
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Shall we schedule when and where to meet then? I still have to pick up
> my tickets.
> J. Leclanche
That's great!
Is June 14 or 15 OK for you?
I'll be available after 15:00 on June 14 after the conference.
Thanks!
Theme is always the weak point of Qt. Gtk+ does better in this field IMO.
The problem of Qss is quite apparent. It does not work together with QStyle.
When they're used at the same time, your widgets stop following the
default style set by qtconfig.
That's why changing the widget styles, fonts, and
Hi,
After some hacking to add missing link directories and move pkgconfig
files around, I confirm that LXQt works in FreeBSD. I'll post a
screenshot to blog later.
Here are tips to get them work.
* Update all components to the latest code in git with the fixes.
* May need to pass --sysconf=/etc t
After working in FreeBSD installed in a VM, I finally made it work.
Here are the changes:
1. libfm and menu-cache in git now detect FreeBSD and install
pkgconfig file to /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig dir instead of the
default one.
2. bugs in pcmanfm-qt are fixed, so it does not crash in FreeBSD
3.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:00 PM, christ...@surlykke.dk
wrote:
> When i run pcmanfm-qt and open 'Edit->Preferences->Behaviour', the checkbox
> for 'Open files with single click' is disabled.
>
> Is this suppose to work?
>
> br. Chr.
Oops!
I forgot to hide that option.
It does not work at the moment
Make sure you select "LXQt desktop" from the sddm menu.
The name has changed. Please select the new item.
Besides, check ~/.config/session.conf and make sure you don't have
XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=Razor in it.
That's all.
I just encountered the same problem myself previously.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11
OK, after some attempts, I have the following problems.
1. By default we install pkgconfig files (*.pc) files to
/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig, while FreeBSD seems to use
/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig instead. So the *.pc files we installed
for libraries could not be found. That's why builds of many com
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:27 AM, pauline martin <321enil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, this morning I rebuilt, everything that I could. Had to make a couple
> more changes overall. Attached is a patch for the files. I am still not
> having any luck with getting lximage to build. It still does not
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Hi
>
> I usually do these so I'm available, but it'd be really nice if
> someone else can join me. @pcman?
> J. Leclanche
>
Yes, I'm interested. Others?
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:20 AM, JupiterB
1 - 100 of 736 matches
Mail list logo
