Dear LXML People!
I learned that some members of the list were annoyed by my posts. My aim
was never to disrespect any person nor their work for lxml. I you feel
disrespected I am truely sorry for that.
But I am still sure that lxml.objectify is not the perfect solution.
lxml.objectify has i
Salut encore,
Xavier Morel schrieb am 04.03.22 um 12:58:
lxml provides support for custom Element classes (as well as element-ish
e.g. Comment or PI) via the `ElementDefaultClassLookup` registry, and the
ability to hook it into a parser.
But that registry does not seem to have a slot for the
Salut,
Xavier Morel schrieb am 07.03.22 um 13:27:
Sorry for the bother, but I've been looking at
`lxml.etree.set_element_class_lookup`[0] as a way to add validation and
features to lxml usage without having to ban "standard" lxml constructs
(and to control usage by dependencies as well).
I c
