[lxml] Re: Consider keeping manylinux1 wheels for Python 3.6

2024-04-03 Thread Stefan Behnel
Hi, thanks for the report. Miro Hrončok schrieb am 03.04.24 um 15:55: I've noticed that lxml 5.1+ upgraded the manylinux wheels to a newer tag. That came from the migration to cibuildwheel and was only partly intended. The default ensurpip-bundled pip version in Python 3.6 does not support

[lxml] Consider keeping manylinux1 wheels for Python 3.6

2024-04-03 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello, I've noticed that lxml 5.1+ upgraded the manylinux wheels to a newer tag. The default ensurpip-bundled pip version in Python 3.6 does not support newer manylinuxes, hence it is likely that many CI systems that still test 3.6 now attempt to build lxml from sources. Since 5.2, this also fa

[lxml] Re: 5.2.0 doesn't build

2024-04-03 Thread Miro Hrončok
> pytoml.core.TomlError: /tmp/pip-wheel-29w0tw8j/lxml/pyproject.toml(26, 8): > expected_equals We see a similar error (but on line 40) if we try to install lxml on Python 3.6 with the default pip version in the ensurpip module -- 18.1, which is indeed quite old. Updating pip helps.