Stefan Behnel schrieb am 03.03.23 um 09:00:
Stefan Behnel schrieb am 02.03.23 um 08:50:
Am March 1, 2023 3:15:22 PM UTC schrieb holger.jo...@lbbw.de:
Probably a bug in _checkNumber():
https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/d01872ccdf7e1e5e825b6c6292b43e7d27ae5fc4/src/lxml/objectify.pyx#L974
Ah,
Stefan Behnel schrieb am 02.03.23 um 08:50:
Am March 1, 2023 3:15:22 PM UTC schrieb holger.jo...@lbbw.de:
Probably a bug in _checkNumber():
https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/d01872ccdf7e1e5e825b6c6292b43e7d27ae5fc4/src/lxml/objectify.pyx#L974
Ah, yes, it might be the isdigit() check,
> > ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '²²'
> >
> > Probably a bug in _checkNumber():
> > https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/d01872ccdf7e1e5e825b6c6292b43e7d27ae
> > 5fc4/src/lxml/objectify.pyx#L974
>
> str.isdigit() accepts many Unicode characters classified as digits that
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 03:15:22PM +, holger.jo...@lbbw.de wrote:
> ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '²²'
>
> Probably a bug in _checkNumber():
> https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/d01872ccdf7e1e5e825b6c6292b43e7d27ae5fc4/src/lxml/objectify.pyx#L974
str.isdigit()
Am March 1, 2023 3:15:22 PM UTC schrieb holger.jo...@lbbw.de:
>Probably a bug in _checkNumber():
>https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/d01872ccdf7e1e5e825b6c6292b43e7d27ae5fc4/src/lxml/objectify.pyx#L974
Ah, yes, it might be the isdigit() check, actually. That could be too broad.
Not every digit is
> Hi,
> Does anyone think this needs to be posted to the bug tracker?
>
> lxml seems to identify superscripts as an integer but then throws an
> exception.
>
> Thanks
>
> Alex
>
>
> from lxml import objectify
> xml = """
>
> ²²
>
> """
> doc = objectify.fromstring(xml)
>
Sorry, I forgot to include the version numbers:
Python : sys.version_info(major=3, minor=11, micro=1,
releaselevel='final', serial=0)
lxml.etree : (4, 9, 2, 0)
libxml used : (2, 9, 14)
libxml compiled : (2, 9, 14)
libxslt used: (1, 1, 35)
libxslt
