Re: lynx-dev checkbox with empty value

2000-06-04 Thread David Woolley
> see it fixed in the official version, but should I stop > holding my breath? The most reliable way of achieving this is to submit a well designed patch. ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lynx-dev checkbox with empty value

2000-06-02 Thread Janne Peltonen
Hi, A while ago we exchanged a couple of mails about Lynx not respecting value="" in checkbox inputs. I would like to see it fixed in the official version, but should I stop holding my breath? Janne ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lynx-dev checkbox with empty value

2000-05-02 Thread Janne Peltonen
> so the issue isn't the state that the checkbox *starts out* in? [turned on or > off]? That's what it seemed like from the original message. > No, that is taken care by the 'checked' attribute. Value attribute in this case specifies only the value to be submitted back to the server if the chec

Re: lynx-dev checkbox with empty value

2000-05-02 Thread mattack
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Klaus Weide wrote: >Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 17:18:14 -0500 (CDT) >From: Klaus Weide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: lynx-dev checkbox with empty value > >On Tue, 2 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: lynx-dev checkbox with empty value

2000-05-02 Thread Janne Peltonen
> Have you tested this? > > > [patch deleted] I only tested it with Lynx 2.8.1rel.2 with the forms I am using. As this was the first time I looked at the sources, I wouldn't trust the patch too much. > > I would be more careful, and do this change only for the "checkbox" and > "radio" case.

Re: lynx-dev checkbox with empty value

2000-05-02 Thread Klaus Weide
On Tue, 2 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 2 May 2000, Klaus Weide wrote: > >Neither could I; so value="" should be treated as any > >other value. > > empty meaning OFF makes far more sense than empty meaning ON. The default > state is off, until you turn it on. We're not talking abo

Re: lynx-dev checkbox with empty value

2000-05-02 Thread mattack
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Klaus Weide wrote: >Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 16:24:20 -0500 (CDT) >From: Klaus Weide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: lynx-dev checkbox with empty value > >On Tue, 2 May 100, Janne Peltonen wro

Re: lynx-dev checkbox with empty value

2000-05-02 Thread Klaus Weide
On Tue, 2 May 100, Janne Peltonen wrote: > It seems that Lynx handles checkbox type inputs with an empty ("") > value attribute as if the value was not given at all. When such a > checked checkbox is submitted, Lynx sends the string "on" rather than > an empty string. Netscape and IE don't replac