On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:09:48PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 04:54 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >>I read somewhere that stacks are best implemented as deques. Don't ask me
> >>why now,
> >>but I think they are slightly cheaper. (I'm sure Andre would have a view
> >>about thi
See also output_xhtml.h:
typedef std::deque TagDeque;
///
typedef std::vector TagStack;
/// holds start tags until we know there is content in them.
TagDeque pending_tags_;
/// remembers the history, so we can make sure we nest properly.
TagS
> I read somewhere that stacks are best implemented as deques. Don't ask me
> why now,
> but I think they are slightly cheaper. (I'm sure Andre would have a view
> about this.)
Some googling gives me:
The C++ Standard, in section 23.1.1, offers some advice on which
containers to prefer. It says:
> - /// Call then when existing things like footnotes.
> + /// Call this when existing things like footnotes.
> void restoreLastLayout() { layout_stack_.pop_back(); }
exiting ?
Besides, why are counter_stack_ and layout_stack_ deque's ?
>/// Used to keep track of active counte
Author: rgheck
Date: Thu Dec 2 21:22:10 2010
New Revision: 36663
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36663
Log:
Some cleanup of the counters code.
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/src/Counters.cpp
lyx-devel/trunk/src/Counters.h
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Counters.cpp
==
