Re: LyX web site

1999-07-22 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Amir Karger wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 12:55:38PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > And I think a smaller home page is better: loads faster, less > > > clutter, gets the important information (new versions, other news) across > > > better. > > > > Good thinking. > > Well,

Re: LaTeX file handling

1999-07-22 Thread Arnd Hanses
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 02:30:19 +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote: >+ name.toAsciiPrintable(); /* AHanses: Set bit 0, unset bit >= 5 Arrgh typo in comment, I meant: + name.toAsciiPrintable(); /* AHanses: bit 4 high, bit > 5 low, leave 0-3,5 as is */

Re: LaTeX file handling

1999-07-22 Thread Arnd Hanses
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999 19:11:17 +0200 (MET DST), Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >Arnd> Well, this works on my box. (Did not test every >Arnd> possible 8 bit combination, too lazy to write a test program). Yes, for me it works well, as it seems. >Arnd> Is this safe on all UNICES? > >Arnd> Better ideas

Re: LaTeX file handling

1999-07-22 Thread Arnd Hanses
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:34:41 +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote: >Well, > >this works on my box even for unprintable control characters, Reread the bit stuff, wouldn't bit-wise OR p->s[i] |= 0x21 ensure that bit 6 and bit 0 are set? And re-thinking: What about simply ignoring the user's file

Re: LyX 1.0.4pre2 bug?

1999-07-22 Thread Sasa Janiska
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > There is nothing strange in it... Another question: do you have some > locale setting in effect (LANG, LC_ALL, KDE language setting...)? Does > removing it improve things? I am not aware of it. Only, I am using latin-2 fonts and use croatian (la

Re: LyX 1.0.4pre2 bug?

1999-07-22 Thread Sasa Janiska
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Many crashes? That's not good :( What you could do, is either > > 1/ To send us precise directions to reproduce the crashes > I just did normal View DVI and program crashed. It looked like one of these 'normal crashes' I had in the last time wit

Re: LyX web site

1999-07-22 Thread Amir Karger
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 07:19:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Amir> Well, it's not just me. I've been reading www.useit.com. > > Interesting, indeed. AFAICT, this guy has a lot of good things to say. "useit" stands for "usable IT". Which I don't really know what it is, but he stress

Re: LyX web site

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 12:55:38PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: >> > And I think a smaller home page is better: loads faster, less > >> clutter, gets the important information (new versions, other news) >> across > better. >> >> Good think

Re: LaTeX file handling

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Arnd" == Arnd Hanses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Arnd> Well, this works on my box even for unprintable control Arnd> characters, they are simply ommitted. (Did not test every Arnd> possible 8 bit combination, too lazy to write a test program). Arnd> Is this safe on all UNICES? Arnd> Bett

Re: LyX web site

1999-07-22 Thread Amir Karger
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 12:55:38PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > And I think a smaller home page is better: loads faster, less > > clutter, gets the important information (new versions, other news) across > > better. > > Good thinking. Well, it's not just me. I've been reading www.useit.com. > >

LaTeX file handling

1999-07-22 Thread Arnd Hanses
Well, this works on my box even for unprintable control characters, they are simply ommitted. (Did not test every possible 8 bit combination, too lazy to write a test program). Is this safe on all UNICES? Better ideas someone? More generic approach desirable? Shall I submit a patch or bette

Re: emx file handling patch

1999-07-22 Thread Arnd Hanses
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999 15:50:25 +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote: >>As I said, don't do this here. It is much more efficient to bitand 0x7f >>to whole the string: >> >>LString& LString::discardSign() >>{ >>for (int i=0; i>p->s[i] |= 0x7f; >>return *this; >>} >> arrgh, bewar

Re: docbook implementation II

1999-07-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 04:59:04PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jose> Hi, from our previous discussion I have changed several things: > > Jose>* linuxdoc now supports all the different fonts as lyx. + > Jose>

Re: docbook implementation II

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose> Hi, from our previous discussion I have changed several things: Jose>* linuxdoc now supports all the different fonts as lyx. + Jose> typewriter + sans serif + italic + slanted + bold + emphasis Great! Jose>*

docbook implementation II

1999-07-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
Hi, from our previous discussion I have changed several things: * linuxdoc now supports all the different fonts as lyx. + typewriter + sans serif + italic + slanted + bold + emphasis * added a C preprocessor constant to the place wher

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Jose> I will certainly insert later some boundary check to avoid >> the > Jose> program to abort because someone has nested more than >> 10 levels. > > What kind of limits are these? Array bounds? Andre'> STL-arrays can grow IIRC

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Andre' Poenitz
> > Jose> I will certainly insert later some boundary check to avoid the > > Jose> program to abort because someone has nested more than 10 levels. > > > > What kind of limits are these? Array bounds? STL-arrays can grow IIRC. Maybe there is no compelling reason to use a fixed upper bound at

Re: LyX 1.0.4pre2 bug?

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Sasa" == Sasa Janiska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Another idea: are you using linux? If you do, could you send the >> output of the command ldd `which lyx` >> Sasa> Yes, I'm running SuSE Linux 6.1. Output is attached as a file. There is nothing strange in it... Another question: do y

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose> On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 03:59:13PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Jose> wrote: >> > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Jose> A simple question: I have several hard limits, magic numb

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 03:59:13PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jose> A simple question: I have several hard limits, magic numbers, in > Jose> the two routines that write linuxdoc and docbook. Any advice how > Jose

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose> A simple question: I have several hard limits, magic numbers, in Jose> the two routines that write linuxdoc and docbook. Any advice how Jose> to handle that? Jose> I will certainly insert later some boundary check to

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose> Since I (we) didn't want to define a new layout tag, I have Jose> packed all the information in LatexParam. Jose>The former declaration is equivalent to: Jose> LatexParam "other_param..." LayoutDepth n Jo

Re: emx file handling patch

1999-07-22 Thread Arnd Hanses
On 22 Jul 1999 14:34:07 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >As I said, don't do this here. It is much more efficient to bitand 0x7f >to whole the string: > >LString& LString::discardSign() >{ >for (int i=0; ip->s[i] |= 0x7f; >return *this; >} > And something like th

Re: xforms bugs (was:Re: searchpath)

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> Allan Rae wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Allan> [...] >> > I'm not sure whether the bug is in xforms or in the math >> panel. It > depends on what the xforms manual says :) >> >> I'll take a look at this o

Re: LyX 1.0.4pre2 bug?

1999-07-22 Thread Sasa Janiska
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > That's very strange. The document contains > > \def\input@path{{/home/mama/knjiga/32//}} > > Where the ^A is a controld character and not a simple '.'. Are you > sure that your directory name contains a real '.'? > I made normal directory with

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 03:12:07PM +, Andre' Poenitz wrote: > > Since I (we) didn't want to define a new layout tag, I have packed all > > the information in LatexParam. > > > >The former declaration is equivalent to: > > > > LatexParam "other_param..." > > LayoutD

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
A simple question: I have several hard limits, magic numbers, in the two routines that write linuxdoc and docbook. Any advice how to handle that? I will certainly insert later some boundary check to avoid the program to abort because someone has nested more than 10 levels. In 1.1 it is

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Andre' Poenitz
> Since I (we) didn't want to define a new layout tag, I have packed all > the information in LatexParam. > >The former declaration is equivalent to: > > LatexParam "other_param..." > LayoutDepth n > > This is a 2 in 1, like the shampoos ;-) It looks hack-ish.

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 02:20:21PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jose> Hello all, I made some advances implementing docbook. > > Jose>* command type layouts now use a number to define their > Jose> relative ord

Re: xforms bugs (was:Re: searchpath)

1999-07-22 Thread Allan Rae
Allan Rae wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: [...] > > I'm not sure whether the bug is in xforms or in the math panel. It > > depends on what the xforms manual says :) > > I'll take a look at this one. It's a problem in the math panel: when the > math panel is closed it

Re: docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose> Hello all, I made some advances implementing docbook. Jose>* command type layouts now use a number to define their Jose> relative order. This number is passed inside the latexparams Jose> argument as: Jose> Late

Re: bug report with math display and \sum

1999-07-22 Thread Emmanuel Dumas
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Emmanuel" == Emmanuel Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Emmanuel> Hi I've found a bug. I work on SGI O2 on IRIX 6.3, I use > Emmanuel> lyx-1.0.4pre2 compiled with egcs 1.1.2. > > Emmanuel> To reproduced the bug you made this (I note "M-m" the > Emmanue

docbook implementation progress

1999-07-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
Hello all, I made some advances implementing docbook. * command type layouts now use a number to define their relative order. This number is passed inside the latexparams argument as: LatexPara "n|other_param..." where n is a signed integer. This makes o

Re: alfa classes (alphanumeric sectioning and table of contents)

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Arnd" == Arnd Hanses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Arnd> Yes, I'll do this. It's what I called 'raw' support. Certainly Arnd> it provides more flexibility than forcing people to use KOMA. Arnd> Nevertheless, I'm a bit reluctant, as I'm unable to test all Arnd> possible combinations with tho

Re: emx file handling patch

1999-07-22 Thread Arnd Hanses
I'm cc'ing to X/2 list, as IMHO it may be of some generic interest: On 22 Jul 1999 14:34:07 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> - >> + name.subst('=DF', 'z'); /* AHanses: no more trouble with 'umlauts'? */= >> >> + name.subst('=E4', 'a'); >> +

Re: LyX 1.0.4pre2 bug?

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Sasa" == Sasa Janiska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sasa> On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Strange... Could you after this first run, find your .tex file in >> /tmp/lyx_tmp/... and send it to the list (if it is short). I'd >> like to see what's is in it. >> Sasa> Thi

Re: bug report with math display and \sum

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Emmanuel" == Emmanuel Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Emmanuel> Hi I've found a bug. I work on SGI O2 on IRIX 6.3, I use Emmanuel> lyx-1.0.4pre2 compiled with egcs 1.1.2. Emmanuel> To reproduced the bug you made this (I note "M-m" the Emmanuel> key-sequence Alt and d): start lyx, open a

Re: LyX web site

1999-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> 1) Where do I put it? The main page? I've been thinking of Amir> creating an "about" page which would link to the intro Amir> (currently called about), features, i18n, screenshots, and the Amir> lgt. Which would make the initial page s