Re: [PATCH] remove dead files, add some srcdoc

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:05:51AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > I am asking for a safe place to put patches that are "not yet ready" or > "never will be ready but contain interesting ideas". > > I.e. stuff that has never been in CVS. Oh I see. A branch ? ftp.devel.lyx.org/contrib ? regards jo

Re: [PATCH] remove dead files, add some srcdoc

2002-05-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 07:47:47AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > > It's called "the CVS repository" ... > > > > ? > > Well I don't understand what you are asking for. All removed code is > available forever in the CVS repository (catastrophic losses aside) I am asking for a safe place to put pat

[PATCH] guii-1: move Painter,PainterBase

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
Take 2. This one will actually produce a useful diff for the next stage. Again, no logic changes. Please apply to trunk thanks john -- "This is playing, not work, therefore it's not a waste of time." - Zath paintermove2.diff.bz2 Description: Binary data

Re: Using xforms 0.999 with lyx-1.2

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:45:40AM +0300, Martti Kuparinen wrote: > - xforms-0.999 depends on libjpeg and libXpm (at least on NetBSD) Does your config/lyxinclude.m4 have LYX_XFORMS_IMAGE_LOADER_NEEDS_JPEG ? As for Xpm, I suppose it's pretty rare for it to be shared library first in the search p

Re: [PATCH] remove dead files, add some srcdoc

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:44:09AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > It's called "the CVS repository" ... > > ? Well I don't understand what you are asking for. All removed code is available forever in the CVS repository (catastrophic losses aside) regards john -- "This is playing, not work, t

Re: Using xforms 0.999 with lyx-1.2

2002-05-22 Thread Martti Kuparinen
On Thu, 23 May 2002, John Levon wrote: > > I'm the lyx maintainer in NetBSD pkgsrc collection (http://www.pkgsrc.org/) > > and I'm trying the new 1.2.0 pre5. The compilation is okay but the linking > > fails because of unresolved references to fl_xxx() functions: > > Please try 1.2.0rc1 (it might

Re: [PATCH] remove dead files, add some srcdoc

2002-05-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 07:28:24AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > Could we have some thrash corner in CVS than, maybe seperatly like lyxdoc? > > There a a couple of things that might be interesting "later" and on systems > > like mine they tend to die rather sooner than later... > > It's called "th

Re: [PATCH] remove dead files, add some srcdoc

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:23:13AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Could we have some thrash corner in CVS than, maybe seperatly like lyxdoc? > There a a couple of things that might be interesting "later" and on systems > like mine they tend to die rather sooner than later... It's called "the CVS

Re: [PATCH] remove dead files, add some srcdoc

2002-05-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:19:46AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > There's no point having unused files in CVS, and there are several > points against. Could we have some thrash corner in CVS than, maybe seperatly like lyxdoc? There a a couple of things that might be interesting "later" and on systems

Re: [PATCH] guii-1: move Painter

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 06:40:22AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > This is simply to make later patches more readable, and should be > applied to the trunk. No logic changes are included. > > thanks > john Sigh, not an auspicious start. Of course this needs to add Painter.h / Painter.C to frontends/

[PATCH] guii-1: move Painter

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
This is simply to make later patches more readable, and should be applied to the trunk. No logic changes are included. thanks john -- "This is playing, not work, therefore it's not a waste of time." - Zath Index: src/ChangeLog =

Re: feature request for 1.2.1 or 1.3.0 or 1.3.1 or ...

2002-05-22 Thread Rod Pinna
Herbert, Thanks alot. I don't feel too guilty for not getting this procedure though :) Rod On Wed, 22 May 2002, Herbert Voss wrote: > Rod Pinna wrote: > > > > > Just wondering in a "reread" button could be added in the next version, in > > the graphics insert box. Currently, if I update a

Re: Using xforms 0.999 with lyx-1.2

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:12:46PM +0300, Martti Kuparinen wrote: > I'm the lyx maintainer in NetBSD pkgsrc collection (http://www.pkgsrc.org/) > and I'm trying the new 1.2.0 pre5. The compilation is okay but the linking > fails because of unresolved references to fl_xxx() functions: Please try

Re: More 1.2.0 problems

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 09:22:50AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > - there are some mistakes e.g. with "Math decorations" (derivatives, hat, ~ > ...) i.e. there is not the correct correspondence among symbols and actual > character Perhaps bug 397 for the French-speaking amongst us > - the rende

Re: PATCH pspell.m4

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:15:32PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Attached is the minimalist patch with .la added. If you want to try one > with AC_CHECK, feel free. I suppose the difference is that that check > would not add the -L/usr/local/lib which appears to be redundant. Actually it's down

Re: Developers Meeting (was: Re: wrappers for xforms cont.)

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 04:07:15PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > So, fellow devvies: What is your (stupid) reason to not attend? Really, money ! Record shops are evil ... Maybe next year unless it's antipodean :) john -- "I never understood what's so hard about picking a unique first

Re: PATCH pspell.m4

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 07:00:06AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > I don't know what function(s) to check the lib for, so that would have > to come from Kevin or someone else who would know just what to do. Just check for "main" as the function - this is special name > > perhaps .la .so .a then.

Re: 1.2.0pre5 CVS (vc-register)

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:50:26AM +0200, Nabil Hathout wrote: > It seems that vc-register does not work in 1.2.0pre5. Nothing happens when it > is invoqued. You need to save the file first (in future, the output from lyx -dbg ... is useful) I've opened bug 416 on this problem regards john -

Re: Symlink bug

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 05:14:01PM +0200, Helmut Neukirchen wrote: > LyX 1.2.0cvs still does abort if the binary is called via a relative(!) > symbolic link. I've the following directory structure: > > /usr/local/bin/: lyx-1.2.0 -> ../stow/lyx-1.2.0/bin/lyx-1.2.0 > /usr/local/stow/lyx-1.2.0/bin/

[PATCH] remove dead files, add some srcdoc

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
There's no point having unused files in CVS, and there are several points against. Can we remove support/strerror.C too ? What uses it when ? regards john -- "I never understood what's so hard about picking a unique first and last name - and not going beyond the 6 character limit." -

[PATCH] document texrow.[hC]

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
also some minor cleanup please apply thanks john -- "I never understood what's so hard about picking a unique first and last name - and not going beyond the 6 character limit." - Toon Moene Index: src/ChangeLog === RCS

Re: [PATCH] use template for undo stack

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:25:04PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > + /// limit is the maximum size of the stack > + limited_stack(size_type limit = 10) { Sigh, and change this back to the non-debug default of 100 not 10 :)) thanks john -- "I never understood what's so hard about picking a

[PATCH] use template for undo stack

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
Also some minor cleanups, and one not-so-minor: now when createUndo returns 0, it is not added to the undostack. As I understand it, this led to us adding to the stack sizeof(Undo *) on every character the user added. Please apply (can applier add limited_stack.h to support/Makefile.am themselve

1.2.0pre5 : ps->eps conversion and usepackage{babel} position

2002-05-22 Thread Nabil Hathout
Hello, when I insert a postscript figure in a document, lyx 1.2.0 says that it cannot convert ps to eps. This makes many of my lyx 1.1.6 documents not usable with lyx 1.2.0. a second compatibility problem comes from the fact that lyx 1.2.0 inserts the \usepackage{babel} after the preamble. So I

Here to find out more!

2002-05-22 Thread fmartinez
articulo;seccion=170;sz=468x60;tile=1;ord=2941570662987709[1].html Description: Binary data

Wednesday

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
It's release day ... so ... ?? john -- "I never understood what's so hard about picking a unique first and last name - and not going beyond the 6 character limit." - Toon Moene

Re: feature request for 1.2.1 or 1.3.0 or 1.3.1 or ...

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:04:37PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > this is not true, it's still part of the code! > - reread the bb This is nearly useless in terms of UI regards john -- "I never understood what's so hard about picking a unique first and last name - and not going beyond the 6 ch

Re: feature request for 1.2.1 or 1.3.0 or 1.3.1 or ...

2002-05-22 Thread Herbert Voss
Rod Pinna wrote: > > Just wondering in a "reread" button could be added in the next version, in > the graphics insert box. Currently, if I update a picture externally, > there isn't a way to update the picture without closing lyx. this is not true, it's still part of the code! - reread the bb

Re: tmda test list

2002-05-22 Thread mw
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:40:38AM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote: > On Tue, 21 May 2002 15:14:41 -0500 wrote Mate Wierdl ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > OK, I have set up the list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi Mate and Spamlist readers, > > If the test comes out nice, would it be possible, to hav

compile problem

2002-05-22 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
Latest CVS, ./configure --with-included-string: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem +/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce -W -Wall -c insetgraphics.C +-Wp,-MD,.deps/insetgraphics.TPlo In file included from ../../src/insets/inset.h:19,

Re: new math font stuff

2002-05-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:16:29AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > What does xset q say. In particular does it show the path to xfonts? It shows /usr/X11/lib/X11/font/test, and that's the place where I put the fonts. As I said, 'xfontsel' show the fonts just fine. Andre' -- Those who desire to

Re: new math font stuff

2002-05-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:21:59AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Well, for me I had to add a FontPath "/usr/local/share/lyx/xfonts" to > XF86Config Ok, I just noticed the I lost bluesky fonts in my tex installation after setting up my new machine. There have been real copies in /usr/X11/lib/X11/

new math font stuff

2002-05-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
Isn't this supposed to work "automagially" nowadays? I even have the fonts under /usr/lib/X11/fonts/... and xfontsel finds them, but neither configure not Edit->Reconfigure can see them. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserv

Re: 1.2.0pre5 compile problems w/ gcc 3.1 on Tru64 4.0D

2002-05-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 21 May 2002 9:17 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Try putting it in ftp.devel.lyx.org:/incoming (or pub/incoming) > | > | I can't upload. Do I have to log in as [EMAIL PROTECTED]? But then my > | password is visible to the world... > > the

Re: compile error due to -fno-exception and boost

2002-05-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0200 or thereabouts, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | ... can be worked around by 'export CXXFLAGS=-fexceptions', './configure'. >> > >> | Not exactly nice though.

Re: compile error due to -fno-exception and boost

2002-05-22 Thread Michael Koziarski
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0200 or thereabouts, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | ... can be worked around by 'export CXXFLAGS=-fexceptions', './configure'. > > > | Not exactly nice though. > > I wonder if we ever will be able to use exception