Garst R. Reese wrote:
> What's wrong with:
> Paste C-v
> Paste... >
Tha answer I got to this: dithering. I didn't dare to ask more...
I would put "Pick & Paste", but partially because it sounds funny. ;^)
Regards, Alfredo
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | What's wrong with:
| > | Paste C-v
| > | Paste... >
| > |
| > | ?
| >
| > IMHO too similar.
| >
| > but it is better than "Recent"
| >
| > --
| >
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | What's wrong with:
> | Paste C-v
> | Paste... >
> |
> | ?
>
> IMHO too similar.
>
> but it is better than "Recent"
>
> --
> Lgb
Well, I'm wondering why we have both. C-v could bring up the list if
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > There is nothing in common between "Open Recent" and "Paste Recent",
| > OR has a list of recently opened documents. PR has a list of recently
| > copied and cut selections, not a list of recently pasted selections.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> There is nothing in common between "Open Recent" and "Paste Recent",
> OR has a list of recently opened documents. PR has a list of recently
> copied and cut selections, not a list of recently pasted selections.
>
> SO IMO "Paste Recent" is utterly misnamed. Unless
Thanks for all the replies.
--with-included-boost didn't work -- tried it before writing to the list
the first time. I'd bet it's the automake: the manual on gnu.org (for AM
1.7.5) includes the conditional construction which doesn't work for me.
I'll ask the sysop to install the new version.
Th
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:19:03AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lior Silberman wrote:
> | >
> | > Hi,
> | Hi Lior, welcome back.
> | Try adding --with-included-boost to your configure.
> | I think your versions of automake and auto
> In Note OTOH you can place whatever you want inside the inset. With
> my
IMO you can put *anything* into the comment environment (have a look at the
verbatim docs for details). That's why comment should be implemented as
collapsable.
In that case it will work :-) Thans for the idea!
Martin
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > SO IMO "Paste Recent" is utterly misnamed. Unless I get strong
| > objections and well founded objections I am going to change this to
| > "Select and Paste".
|
| I find that the "select" word is confusing in this
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Isn't that a LaTeX limitation? Implementing it as an inset in LyX
> wouldn't remove this limitation, if you insist on having it output
> \begin{commwent} \end{comment} pairs.
Certainly not. I can have something like
\begin{comment}
\section{First Section}
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> SO IMO "Paste Recent" is utterly misnamed. Unless I get strong
> objections and well founded objections I am going to change this to
> "Select and Paste".
I find that the "select" word is confusing in this context, because it seems
to refer to the action of selection
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:28:44PM +0200, Michael Schmitt spake thusly:
>
> Dear Martin,
>
> could you please send us some screenshots, please? I am very curious but
> I don't want to recompile the whole LyX code at the moment.
>
> Thanks, Michael
Wish I could. At the end of a slow phone line.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 03:56:04PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Have you considered to implement the comment environment into that
> > > concept?
> >
> > In what way different from Note?
>
> Different in the way that the content will be exported to LaTe
I get errors from a lot of files, and tex2lyx is near to uncompilable
with --with-included-string.
gcc 3.2.2
--
Lgb
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Have you considered to implement the comment environment into that
> > concept?
>
> In what way different from Note?
Different in the way that the content will be exported to LaTeX, embedded into
\begin{comment} ... \end{comment} statements (whereas Note is only LyX
int
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 04:12:49PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > Here is a patch (and some new files) that generalize the Note
> > inset to serve as a variety of annotation insets: Foot, Margin, ...,
> > as well as Branches.
>
> Have you considered to
There is nothing in common between "Open Recent" and "Paste Recent",
OR has a list of recently opened documents. PR has a list of recently
copied and cut selections, not a list of recently pasted selections.
SO IMO "Paste Recent" is utterly misnamed. Unless I get strong
objections and well founde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| I thought that we should make the namespace stuff a bit more
| finegrained than just lyx::, so I have put all the src/support
| files/classes/functions under lyx::support.
| (except lyxstring for now.)
lyxstring -> lyx::string, Assert, and Qt as w
18 matches
Mail list logo
