Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-05 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:46:23PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It's a pity that you feel the need to jump all over someone making > a few observation for the first time in YEARS, rather than let them > settle in, and maybe to get some broader community reaction. I don't walk into a saloon,

Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-05 Thread larry
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 07:47:59PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > Sorry, your head is stuck in the ground ... > It's frankly a waste of my time ... > You obviously have no conception ... > You're making statements. You're not actually saying anything... > You're arguing against a chimera I'm afraid .

Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-05 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 09:55:51AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My head is not "in the ground". We obviously have longstanding, dramatic > > But you'd be hard pressed to offer a host of significant new features, from the > user's standpoint, introduced in the last two years. Sorry, your

Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-05 Thread larry
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:25:58PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > This isn't true: the licensing scheme is clearly documented. We were and > are well aware of its drawbacks. I didn't exactly start questioning the QT effort yesterday, as you well know. No one would doubt your understanding of the d

Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-05 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: > > perhaps unsurprisingly i am all for it > > Me too. I'm with Edwin and John for the practical reasons Edwin already pointed out. It might sound egoistic, but a native win port would just make my life much easier. So if you change your mind and need my ok you'll certainly hav

Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-05 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 06:41:43PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there another option, that doesn't require *unrealistic* local builds? No, there isn't. That does *not* make Troll Tech the bad guys. For starters, they've released a pretty damn good toolkit under the GPL for two major platf

lyx-qt does not bring up Preferences in math

2003-07-05 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
With cursor in math-mode, click on Tools->Preferences. Nothing happens. Now move outside the math box. Click on Tools->Preferences. The preference dialog comes up. -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Kath

Re: Newest CVS build failure

2003-07-05 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 10:31:16PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 10:09:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > | I went ahead and installed gcc-2.96 on my old Redhat system (built > > | from the source RPM) and al