Build fix for tex2lyx on Solaris

2003-07-27 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
The following make problem happens in Solaris. Seems that the version of /bin/sh does not like empty for i in ... do ... done constructs. Looking at the tex2lyx Makefile.am, it looks like the graphics_linked_files part is not necessary. Also, the solaris ln does not really work as expected with

Re: lyx-devel src/: BufferView.C BufferView.h BufferView_pimpl ...

2003-07-27 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote: I found the problem. Cannot reproduce any crash now. Thanks. Juergen.

Re: [patch] auto_ptr patch

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: Complain within two seconds or this patch goes in. I find it useful for compilability to add #include memory at least to insetbase.h. gcc 2.95.2. Comments on its age are *not* appreciated :-) -- Lgb

Re: [patch] auto_ptr patch

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: | | | Complain within two seconds or this patch goes in. | | I find it useful for compilability to add | | #include memory Yes I know that memory is needed, strictly

Re: [patch] auto_ptr patch

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:56:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: | | | Complain within two seconds or this patch goes in. | | I find it useful for

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 04:26:57PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly: ... Almost perfect :-) A few nitpicks though: - The color choice should be removed completely. - The available browser should be on the left. ...contrary to the FormCitation practice. - The remove branch button

Re: [patch] auto_ptr patch

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | You mean I should commit this patch? A one liner... Yes. -- Lgb

Re: [patch] auto_ptr patch

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 06:13:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | You mean I should commit this patch? A one liner... Yes. -- Lgb Done as ordered :-) Martin pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | (This contains the memory patch. I'll separate it out if you | prefer.) I'd like fixes in a separate patch. memory and InsetOld fixes. -- Lgb

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | (This contains the memory patch. I'll separate it out if you | prefer.) I'd like fixes in a separate patch. memory and InsetOld fixes. -- Lgb memory has

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: | | Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | (This contains the memory patch. I'll separate it out if you | | prefer.) | | | I'd like fixes in a separate patch.

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 09:47:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: | | Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | (This contains the memory patch.

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Yes... that your InsetOld patch necessitated changes to my Branches | patch, nothing more. | | This Branches patch (biggish) is all I have pending here now, against | cvs of this afternoon. Ok, but let's wait with the brances patch until we get how

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:16:46PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Yes... that your InsetOld patch necessitated changes to my Branches | patch, nothing more. | | This Branches patch (biggish) is all I have pending here now, against |

In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
Hi, near follows a patch to add end_layout to the lyx file format. Comments? -- José Abílio

Re: In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 09:27:38PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: Hi, near follows a patch to add end_layout to the lyx file format. Comments? Hmmm -- José Abílio -- José Abílio Matos LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-) ? lib/doc/UserGuide-1.lyx ?

Re: In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Index: src/buffer.C | === | RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/buffer.C,v | retrieving revision 1.499 | diff -u -r1.499 buffer.C | --- src/buffer.C 26 Jul 2003

Re: [patch] buffer (fwd)

2003-07-27 Thread Braunstein Alfredo
too much beer really -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:52:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Braunstein Alfredo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [patch] buffer Today John Levon wrote: On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 09:58:50PM +0200, Braunstein Alfredo

Re: In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:39:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: \\end_layout should have an explicit test, not an inveted one. and it should imho also give an error message for the wrongly placed/not handled \\end_layout. Is the

Re: In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:39:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | \\end_layout should have an explicit test, not an inveted one. and it | should imho also give an error

Re: In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 11:47:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | Is the following ok? this kindo looks right. so yes I think so. -- Lgb I will increment the file format also... and change lyx2lyx accordingly. -- José Abílio Matos LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-)

[patch] support for zipped lyx files.

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
I you do not want this patch to go in, you have to tell me within 30 seconds. ? src/check ? src/frontends/xforms/lyx_forms.h ? src/frontends/xforms/lyx_xpm.h Index: src/Makefile.am === RCS file:

Re: [patch] buffer (fwd)

2003-07-27 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:54:38PM +0200, Braunstein Alfredo wrote: Can we just consider these inconsistencies as bugs? Really, I think that they all mean the same (cannot open file for writing). Am I right? Hmm, indeed, sorry john

Build fix for tex2lyx on Solaris

2003-07-27 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
The following make problem happens in Solaris. Seems that the version of /bin/sh does not like empty "for i in ... do ... done" constructs. Looking at the tex2lyx Makefile.am, it looks like the "graphics_linked_files" part is not necessary. Also, the solaris "ln" does not really work as expected

Re: lyx-devel src/: BufferView.C BufferView.h BufferView_pimpl ...

2003-07-27 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote: > I found the problem. Cannot reproduce any crash now. Thanks. Juergen.

Re: [patch] auto_ptr patch

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > > Complain within two seconds or this patch goes in. I find it useful for compilability to add #include at least to insetbase.h. gcc 2.95.2. Comments on its age are *not* appreciated :-) > > -- > Lgb

Re: [patch] auto_ptr patch

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: | | > | > Complain within two seconds or this patch goes in. | | I find it useful for compilability to add | | #include Yes I know that is needed, strictly speaking.

Re: [patch] auto_ptr patch

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:56:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > | > | > > | > Complain within two seconds or this patch goes in. > | > | I find it

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 04:26:57PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly: ... > Almost perfect :-) > A few nitpicks though: > - The color choice should be removed completely. > - The "available" browser should be on the left. ...contrary to the FormCitation practice. > - The remove branch

Re: [patch] auto_ptr patch

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | You mean I should commit this patch? A one liner... Yes. -- Lgb

Re: [patch] auto_ptr patch

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 06:13:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | You mean I should commit this patch? A one liner... > > Yes. > > -- > Lgb Done as ordered :-) Martin pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | (This contains the patch. I'll separate it out if you | prefer.) I'd like fixes in a separate patch. memory and InsetOld fixes. -- Lgb

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | (This contains the patch. I'll separate it out if you > | prefer.) > > > I'd like fixes in a separate patch. > > memory and InsetOld fixes. > > -- > Lgb

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: | > | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | (This contains the patch. I'll separate it out if you | > | prefer.) | > | > | > I'd like fixes in a separate

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 09:47:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > | > > | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > | (This contains the

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Yes... that your InsetOld patch necessitated changes to my Branches | patch, nothing more. | | This Branches patch (biggish) is all I have pending here now, against | cvs of this afternoon. Ok, but let's wait with the brances patch until we get how

Re: Patch [Re: BranchList class for comment^Wtesting]

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:16:46PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Yes... that your InsetOld patch necessitated changes to my Branches > | patch, nothing more. > | > | This Branches patch (biggish) is all I have pending here now,

In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
Hi, near follows a patch to add end_layout to the lyx file format. Comments? -- José Abílio

Re: In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 09:27:38PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > Hi, >near follows a patch to add end_layout to the lyx file format. >Comments? Hmmm > -- > José Abílio -- José Abílio Matos LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-) ? lib/doc/UserGuide-1.lyx ?

Re: In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Index: src/buffer.C | === | RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/buffer.C,v | retrieving revision 1.499 | diff -u -r1.499 buffer.C | --- src/buffer.C 26 Jul 2003

Re: [patch] buffer (fwd)

2003-07-27 Thread Braunstein Alfredo
too much beer really -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:52:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Braunstein Alfredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [patch] buffer Today John Levon wrote: >On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 09:58:50PM +0200, Braunstein

Re: In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:39:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > \\end_layout should have an explicit test, not an inveted one. and it > should imho also give an error message for the wrongly placed/not > handled \\end_layout. Is

Re: In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:39:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > \\end_layout should have an explicit test, not an inveted one. and it | > should imho also give an

Re: In direction to a saner file format (part alpha)

2003-07-27 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 11:47:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > | Is the following ok? > > this kindo looks right. so yes I think so. > > -- > Lgb I will increment the file format also... and change lyx2lyx accordingly. -- José Abílio Matos LyX and docbook a perfect

[patch] support for zipped lyx files.

2003-07-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
I you do not want this patch to go in, you have to tell me within 30 seconds. ? src/check ? src/frontends/xforms/lyx_forms.h ? src/frontends/xforms/lyx_xpm.h Index: src/Makefile.am === RCS file:

Re: [patch] buffer (fwd)

2003-07-27 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:54:38PM +0200, Braunstein Alfredo wrote: > Can we just consider these inconsistencies as bugs? Really, I think that > they all mean the same (cannot open file for writing). Am I right? Hmm, indeed, sorry john