Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:27:40PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: It's not past tense: yes it is. No it's not. if (box.contained(x, y)) if position x,y is contained in box Then how would say: if position x,y was contained in box a) you wouldn't b) was is

Re: Support for inserting partial lyx files...

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:27:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: ... do we need it? I think it's bull and I thought it was bull last time I noticed this code. regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Who to blame? Let's just blame Andre for everything[1] Who to fix? Find out more about the font details ... regards john [1] for the humour impaired, I'm kidding -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Who to blame? | Let's just blame Andre for everything[1] Yes, let's. Who to fix? | Find out more about the font details ... Or begin reverting patches until it works again... it

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Or begin reverting patches until it works again... We're way beyond that point. You had your chance to complain a long time ago regards, john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Or begin reverting patches until it works again... btw, this is just one tiny part if you haven't tried using CVS lyx recently ... 40-50 regressions at least regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Current CVS is crashing on loading the UserGuide... not good. Works for me. On Linux, Solaris and Cygwin. -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura

Re: Why lyx2lyx? why?

2003-09-02 Thread Garst R. Reese
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Now come to think of it... not unlikely at all. Can you try this patch and see if it makes a difference? Indeed! That fixes the problem! With Alfredo's last test patch things look pretty good. Thanks, Garst

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Or begin reverting patches until it works again... | btw, this is just one tiny part if you haven't tried using CVS lyx | recently ... 40-50 regressions at least And not being able to

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Current CVS is crashing on loading the UserGuide... not good. | Works for me. | On Linux, Solaris and Cygwin. I bet I have some missing fonts. _but_ LyX should not crash

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:34:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Or begin reverting patches until it works again... | btw, this is just one tiny part if you haven't tried

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:34:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Or begin reverting patches until it works again... | btw, this

Re: crash with previews

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Open the userguide with previews activated and wait a little - crash. This solves it. Ok to commit? Well? Can someone confirm the crash at least? Regards, Alfredo

Re: [patch] Fix some zlib issues.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | | This patch should take care of most of the zlib issues. | | But I seems to have stumbled upon some other problems, espacially with | | insertion of lyx files. Has that been working of a very

Re: crash with previews

2003-09-02 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Dienstag, 2. September 2003 09:54, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Open the userguide with previews activated and wait a little - crash. This solves it. Ok to commit? Well? Can someone confirm the

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:34:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Or begin reverting patches until it works again... | btw, this is just one tiny part if you haven't

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:34:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Or begin reverting patches until it works again... | btw,

Re: gtk+ patch 2003-9-2

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Huang Ying [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | sorry for my late, I hope I can work harder next time. No worries. I am working on integrating your patch now. -- Lgb

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Garst R. Reese
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is with xforms. -- Lgb I'm not seeing it with Alfredo's patch: Index: BufferView_pimpl.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/BufferView_pimpl.C,v retrieving revision 1.424

Re: [PATCH] typo

2003-09-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: can I apply this to 1.3 and 1.4? Juergen If no one objects until tomorrow morning, I'll apply it (it's Juergen really obvious). I see you did it, it was indeed obvious... JMarc

Re: gtk+ patch 2003-9-2

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | | Huang Ying [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | sorry for my late, I hope I can work harder next time. | | No worries. | | I am working on integrating your patch now. | Thisis the resulting

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote: Are you saying that getInsetName() is the culprit? return bformat(_( Macro: %s: ), getInsetName()); Unrelated: shouldn't the %s be a %1$s to avoid the non-boost::format assert? Alfredo

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:05:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:34:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
John Levon wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:27:40PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: It's not past tense: yes it is. No it's not. if (box.contained(x, y)) if position x,y is contained in box Then how would say: if position x,y was contained in box a) you

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 05:38:56PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan spake thusly: On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Current CVS is crashing on loading the UserGuide... not good. Works for me. On Linux, Solaris and Cygwin. Of course... if you use the

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Alfredo Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Are you saying that getInsetName() is the culprit? | return bformat(_( Macro: %s: ), getInsetName()); | Unrelated: shouldn't the %s be a %1$s to avoid the non-boost::format assert? Yes but %1 should be allowed...

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:14:34AM +0100, Angus Leeming spake thusly: John Levon wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:27:40PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: It's not past tense: yes it is. No it's not. if (box.contained(x, y)) if position x,y is

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote: | return bformat(_( Macro: %s: ), getInsetName()); Yes but %1 should be allowed... so this shows a bug in bformat. but let's change this to %1$s. Also %s should. And I guess you are using boost::format, so your crash is somewhere else, isn't it? Alfredo

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: Actually, it's grammatically incorect (read poor use of the subjunctive) and should be if position x,y were contained in box So nuh! So, could you native speakers come up with a consensus proposal what to call it? I would make it box.inside(x,y), but what do I

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Angus Leeming wrote: a) you wouldn't b) was is past tense, is is not Actually, it's grammatically incorect (read poor use of the subjunctive) and should be if position x,y were contained in box So nuh! We should definitively have both the indicative and subjuntive version of the

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Alfredo Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | return bformat(_( Macro: %s: ), getInsetName()); Yes but %1 should be allowed... so this shows a bug in bformat. but let's change this to %1$s. | Also %s should. And I guess you are using boost::format, so your

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Kuba Ober
On wtorek 02 wrzesie 2003 06:46 am, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Angus Leeming wrote: a) you wouldn't b) was is past tense, is is not Actually, it's grammatically incorect (read poor use of the subjunctive) and should be if position x,y were contained in box So nuh! We should

[BUG] cursor out of sync with position in view

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
When scrolling down with PgDown, the cursor moves along, but if you stop and press right then the page switches to a completely different place (probably one page up or down from what was viewed). -- Lgb

[bug] empty lines presend under inset only paragraphs.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
what subject says. rather annoying. -- Lgb

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:05:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming spake thusly: First try... Second try. ... * insetbibtex.C: + Box b( + center_indent_, + center_indent_ + dim.wid, + -dim.asc, + dim.des + ); You wan't win

Re: gtk+ patch 2003-9-2

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:00:18AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: sorry for my late, I hope I can work harder next time. Lars applied this. But it won't compile : In file included from lyx_gui.C:39: GtkmmX.h: In function `Window getRootWindow()': GtkmmX.h:37: no class template named `Display' in

Re: [bug] empty lines presend under inset only paragraphs.

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:01:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: what subject says. If you can work out how to fix rowBreakPoint() without causing a more serious regression, be my guest... but there are much more important bugs around regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Index: box.C | === | RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/box.C,v | retrieving revision 1.8 | diff -u -p -r1.8 box.C | --- box.C 23 Aug 2003 00:16:06 - 1.8 | +++ box.C

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: As I value your friendship, advise me :-/ See Lars' comments. Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | dispatch_result InsetFloatList::localDispatch(FuncRequest const | cmd) | { | switch (cmd.action) { | - case LFUN_INSET_EDIT: | -

Re: gtk+ patch 2003-9-2

2003-09-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: Lars applied this. But it won't compile It does here. http://home.t-online.de/home/juergen.sp/lyx-gtk.png Looks good. Some comments from a first view: - the main window width can not be made smaller than 800 pixels. Is this intentional? - All toolbars are shown, no matter

Re: gtk+ patch 2003-9-2

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 05:28:12PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Lars applied this. But it won't compile It does here. Sigh. So there is some exact version of the libraries I need. john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.

Re: gtk+ patch 2003-9-2

2003-09-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: Sigh. So there is some exact version of the libraries I need. I have compiled the newest available versions of the libraries (I had to add a workaround to get gtkmm-2 compiled with gcc-3.3). This is the --version, if that helps: Built on Sep 2 2003, 17:03:41 Configuration

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:39:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Martin Vermeer wrote: You would invoke a new LFUN_INSET_SHOW_DIALOG. The code above should be: switch (cmd.action) { - case LFUN_INSET_EDIT: - InsetCommandMailer(toc,

Re: gtk+ patch 2003-9-2

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I have compiled the newest available versions of the libraries That would have required me to build from glib upwards. Sod that :) Anyway, it's obvious the configure tests aren't strong enough. john -- Khendon's Law: If

Re: [BUG] cursor out of sync with position in view

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote: When scrolling down with PgDown, the cursor moves along, but if you stop and press right then the page switches to a completely different place (probably one page up or down from what was viewed). Can you check if the patch attached to

Re: gtk+ patch 2003-9-2

2003-09-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Huang Ying wrote: Looks good. Some comments from a first view: - the main window width can not be made smaller than 800 pixels. Is this intentional? yes! How much do you think the minimum width is appropiate? Don't know. The qt version can be shrinked to about 80x200. I'd say 400x300 has

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:39:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Martin Vermeer wrote: You would invoke a new LFUN_INSET_SHOW_DIALOG. The code above should be: switch (cmd.action) { - case LFUN_INSET_EDIT: -

Re: [Devel] [patch] more 'who we are' nonsense

2003-09-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus Ok. However, I think that author implies significant input. Angus I don't think that I have contributed anything at all other Angus than some Makefile and build infrastructure. Jean-Marc, on the Angus other hand, has definitely been busy ;-)

Re: [Devel] [patch] more 'who we are' nonsense

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 4:32 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus Ok. However, I think that author implies significant input. Angus I don't think that I have contributed anything at all other Angus than some Makefile and build

[PATCH] .ix/y cleanup

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
For some time, .ix() and .iy() have been exactly the same values as .x() and .y(). This patch is a no-functional-change cleanup. See my other post for cursor placement issues. OK ? 11 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) regards john Index: BufferView.C

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Kuba Ober wrote: I think that this discussion tries to differentiate between a box contains the point vs. a point is contained by the box. The difference is whether in object.action(target) one thinks from target to the object (RTL) or from object to the target (LTR). As far as grammatics are

Visible cursor placement

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
Try pressing End in a multi-row par in current CVS. Cursor ends up on the next row, because setCursor() and friends know nothing about which row the cursor is supposed to be on. Same problem with mouse clicks (evident before a full row inset like InsetBibtex). I can't see a clean fix. Anybody ?

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 05:27:21PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Martin Vermeer wrote: ... Sorry to be a pain, but I've just looked at the 1.4.x source. I think that the LFUN exists already as LFUN_DIALOG_SHOW_NEXT_INSET. This LFUN is meant to move the cursor to either

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:33:01PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: One way or the other. Why do my small nice projects always develop into mega-adventures? Because the LyX source is in a bad way ... john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 5:33 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 05:27:21PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Martin Vermeer wrote: ... Sorry to be a pain, but I've just looked at the 1.4.x source. I think that the LFUN exists already as LFUN_DIALOG_SHOW_NEXT_INSET.

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:22:48PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: On Tuesday 02 September 2003 5:33 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 05:27:21PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Martin Vermeer wrote: ... Sorry to be a pain, but I've just looked at the 1.4.x

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 5:56 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: The toggle code in all it's glory is (text3.C): case LFUN_INSET_TOGGLE: bv-beforeChange(this); toggleInset(); bv-update(); bv-switchKeyMap();

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:57:13PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: On Tuesday 02 September 2003 5:56 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: The toggle code in all it's glory is (text3.C): case LFUN_INSET_TOGGLE: bv-beforeChange(this); toggleInset();

Re: Visible cursor placement

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
John Levon wrote: Try pressing End in a multi-row par in current CVS. Cursor ends up on the next row, because setCursor() and friends know nothing about which row the cursor is supposed to be on. Same problem with mouse clicks (evident before a full row inset like InsetBibtex). I can't

Re: Visible cursor placement

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:29:40PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: What about passing a bool to setCursor? (and/or to store this bool in the what sort of bool and where from, under which circumstances ? regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 6:43 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:57:13PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: On Tuesday 02 September 2003 5:56 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: The toggle code in all it's glory is (text3.C): case LFUN_INSET_TOGGLE:

Re: Visible cursor placement

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
John Levon wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:29:40PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: What about passing a bool to setCursor? (and/or to store this bool in the what sort of bool and where from, under which circumstances ? bool = if there is a choice, put me on the next row put to true

getColumnNearX

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
seems to be causing all this don't like x please report. Question: why on earth are there floating point variables involved there? Alfredo

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:32:00PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: On Tuesday 02 September 2003 6:43 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:57:13PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: On Tuesday 02 September 2003 5:56 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: ... toggleInset() ...

Re: Visible cursor placement

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:36:30PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: what sort of bool and where from, under which circumstances ? bool = if there is a choice, put me on the next row Hmm, we could pass in a row iterator to say which row the cursor must be placed. That would work I think, but

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Kuba Ober
You should read better: Actually, it's grammatically incorect (read poor use of the subjunctive) and should be if position x,y were contained in box So nuh! This is all about using the subjunctive in a conditional C++ sentence! Okay, call me lame and ignorant, but what's

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Kuba Ober wrote: You should read better: Actually, it's grammatically incorect (read poor use of the subjunctive) and should be if position x,y were contained in box So nuh! This is all about using the subjunctive in a conditional C++ sentence! Okay, call me lame and

cvsignore for frontends/gtk?

2003-09-02 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
I think we need a .cvsignore file for the GTK frontend: ? src/frontends/gtk/Makefile.in ? src/frontends/gtk/glade/Makefile.in ---Kayvan -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan |

Re: cvsignore for frontends/gtk?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: I think we need a .cvsignore file for the GTK frontend: ? src/frontends/gtk/Makefile.in ? src/frontends/gtk/glade/Makefile.in Committed. See if that helps... -- Angus

All ps figures the same

2003-09-02 Thread Garst R. Reese
I know this was reported some time ago. The lyx view is fine, but the ps view uses the first figure for all the figures. Bug 1313 says it is fixed. Looks like it's back. Is anybody working on this bug? Thanks, Garst

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:27:40PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > It's not past tense: > yes it is. No it's not. > > if (box.contained(x, y)) > > > > if position x,y is contained in box > > > Then how would say: > if position x,y was contained in box a) you wouldn't

Re: Support for inserting partial lyx files...

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:27:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > ... do we need it? I think it's bull and I thought it was bull last time I noticed this code. regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > Who to blame? Let's just blame Andre for everything[1] > Who to fix? Find out more about the font details ... regards john [1] for the humour impaired, I'm kidding -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > >> Who to blame? > | Let's just blame Andre for everything[1] Yes, let's. >> Who to fix? > | Find out more about the font details ... Or begin reverting patches until it works

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > Or begin reverting patches until it works again... We're way beyond that point. You had your chance to complain a long time ago regards, john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > Or begin reverting patches until it works again... btw, this is just one tiny part if you haven't tried using CVS lyx recently ... 40-50 regressions at least regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Current CVS is crashing on loading the UserGuide... not good. Works for me. On Linux, Solaris and Cygwin. -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura

Re: Why lyx2lyx? why?

2003-09-02 Thread Garst R. Reese
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Now come to think of it... not unlikely at all. > > Can you try this patch and see if it makes a difference? > Indeed! That fixes the problem! With Alfredo's last test patch things look pretty good. Thanks, Garst

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > >> Or begin reverting patches until it works again... > | btw, this is just one tiny part if you haven't tried using CVS lyx | recently ... 40-50 regressions at least And not being

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >> Current CVS is crashing on loading the UserGuide... not good. > | Works for me. > | On Linux, Solaris and Cygwin. I bet I have some missing fonts. _but_ LyX should not

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:34:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > > > >> Or begin reverting patches until it works again... > > > | btw, this is just one tiny part if you

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:34:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: >> > >> >> Or begin reverting patches until it works

Re: crash with previews

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > >> Open the userguide with previews activated and wait a little -> crash. > > This solves it. Ok to commit? Well? Can someone confirm the crash at least? Regards, Alfredo

Re: [patch] Fix some zlib issues.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > | | This patch should take care of most of the zlib issues. >> | | But I seems to have stumbled upon some other problems, espacially with | | insertion of lyx files. Has that been working of a very

Re: crash with previews

2003-09-02 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Dienstag, 2. September 2003 09:54, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > >> Open the userguide with previews activated and wait a little -> crash. > > > > This solves it. Ok to commit? > > Well? > > Can someone

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:34:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > > > >> Or begin reverting patches until it works again... > > > | btw, this is just one tiny part if

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:34:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: >> >> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:19:58AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: >> > >> >> Or begin reverting patches until it works

Re: gtk+ patch 2003-9-2

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Huang Ying <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | sorry for my late, I hope I can work harder next time. No worries. I am working on integrating your patch now. -- Lgb

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Garst R. Reese
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > This is with xforms. > > -- > Lgb I'm not seeing it with Alfredo's patch: Index: BufferView_pimpl.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/BufferView_pimpl.C,v retrieving revision

Re: [PATCH] typo

2003-09-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >> can I apply this to 1.3 and 1.4? Juergen> If no one objects until tomorrow morning, I'll apply it (it's Juergen> really obvious). I see you did it, it was indeed obvious... JMarc

Re: gtk+ patch 2003-9-2

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > | | Huang Ying <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | | | sorry for my late, I hope I can work harder next time. >> | | No worries. >> | | I am working on integrating your patch now. > | Thisis the

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Are you saying that getInsetName() is the culprit? return bformat(_(" Macro: %s: "), getInsetName()); Unrelated: shouldn't the %s be a %1$s to avoid the non-boost::format assert? Alfredo

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:05:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:34:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > >> > >> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> | On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:27:40PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > >> > It's not past tense: >> yes it is. > > No it's not. > >> > if (box.contained(x, y)) >> > >> > if position x,y is contained in box >> > >> Then how would say: >> if position x,y was

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 05:38:56PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan spake thusly: > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > > Current CVS is crashing on loading the UserGuide... not good. > > Works for me. > > On Linux, Solaris and Cygwin. Of course... if you use

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Are you saying that getInsetName() is the culprit? > | return bformat(_(" Macro: %s: "), getInsetName()); > | Unrelated: shouldn't the %s be a %1$s to avoid the non-boost::format assert? Yes but %1 should be

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:14:34AM +0100, Angus Leeming spake thusly: > John Levon wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:27:40PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > > >> > It's not past tense: > >> yes it is. > > > > No it's not. > > > >> > if (box.contained(x, y)) > >> > > >> >

Re: CRASH: upon loading UserGuide.

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | return bformat(_(" Macro: %s: "), getInsetName()); > Yes but %1 should be allowed... so this shows a bug in bformat. > but let's change this to %1$s. Also %s should. And I guess you are using boost::format, so your crash is somewhere else, isn't it? Alfredo

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: >> Actually, it's grammatically incorect (read poor use of the >> subjunctive) and should be >> if position x,y were contained in box >> So nuh! >> > So, could you native speakers come up with a consensus proposal what > to call it? I would make it box.inside(x,y),

Re: Inset::display() ?

2003-09-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Angus Leeming wrote: >> a) you wouldn't >> b) "was" is past tense, "is" is not > > Actually, it's grammatically incorect (read poor use of the > subjunctive) and should be > if position x,y were contained in box > So nuh! We should definitively have both the indicative and subjuntive

  1   2   >