Re: LYX 1.3.1 can't find library

2004-04-23 Thread nephill
Georg Baum Wrote: >Why did you compile it yourself? There are .deb packages for xforms 1.0 I went to the expense of buying a 7 CD set, and it was not included. (woody) I used LYX under potato, and liked the unique features. I also want to eventually do my own "custom live" linux distribution. I t

Re: Patches against 1.3.4 for SGI C++ compiler

2004-04-23 Thread Albert Chin
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 07:42:31PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:32:52PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote: > > > The SGI C++ compiler errors out because of #warning which is a GCCism. > > > > src/frontends/qt2/QBrowseBox.C needs 'use std::floor' because it makes > > a call to floo

Re: Buglet: gtk+ frontend

2004-04-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 05:06:16PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > We don't even use branches right now, so what real point is there in > subversion? ... However, I'd agree that there are more important things to fix right now. Andre'

Re: Buglet: gtk+ frontend

2004-04-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 05:06:16PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > My understanding is that you would use an additional bunch of scripts > > called 'submaster' to do that. I am not sure though, and it might even > > be possible to use

This year's meeting

2004-04-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
Is anybody out there planning anything specific? [And no, the long standing suspect isn't as I have been told.] Best I could offer right now as a backup solution would be YAMIC (yet Another Meeting In Chemnitz). I just checked with the club and we could rent it 2.7. - 6.7. or 15.7. - 20.7 or ev

lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org

2004-04-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:59:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > See: > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1542 > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1549 > > Andre', I would like to see this one fixed for 1.3.5 (and 1.4.0). > > 1/ what shall I do to have the key '&' insert \&

Re: Patches against 1.3.4 for SGI C++ compiler

2004-04-23 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:32:52PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote: > The SGI C++ compiler errors out because of #warning which is a GCCism. > > src/frontends/qt2/QBrowseBox.C needs 'use std::floor' because it makes > a call to floor(). Your patch seems wrong. All of them should be #ifdef WITH_WARNING

Patches against 1.3.4 for SGI C++ compiler

2004-04-23 Thread Albert Chin
The SGI C++ compiler errors out because of #warning which is a GCCism. src/frontends/qt2/QBrowseBox.C needs 'use std::floor' because it makes a call to floor(). -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- snip snip --- src/mathed/math_diminset.C.orig 2004-04-12 12:30:41.0 -0500 +++ src/ma

Re: Buglet: gtk+ frontend

2004-04-23 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > My understanding is that you would use an additional bunch of scripts > called 'submaster' to do that. I am not sure though, and it might even > be possible to use 'submaster' together with real CVS. I see, I hadn't realised there w

Re: [patch] fix bug 1231

2004-04-23 Thread Georg Baum
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Won't work. You don't have enough karma yet. Are you going to change that, or do I have to do something before that happens? Georg

Re: [patch] fix bug 1231

2004-04-23 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Georg Baum wrote: > >> The attached patch partly fixes bug 1231 (graphics filename extensions can >> be wrong when exporting .tex). >> It is best to omit the extension entirely, because LaTeX chooses the best >> format in this case. The problem is that this

Re: [patch] fix bug 1231

2004-04-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Georg Baum wrote: >> The attached patch partly fixes bug 1231 (graphics filename >> extensions can be wrong when exporting .tex). It is best to omit >> the extension entirely, because LaTeX chooses the best format in >> this case. The

Re: FYI: gcc 3.2 and 3.4 comparison

2004-04-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:06:43PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 22. April 2004 19:07 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > > I do not think that older gcc's or other compilers should have > > problems with any of this. So apply as you see fit. > > I can confirm that gcc 2.95 works. That sho

Re: [patch] fix bug 1231

2004-04-23 Thread Georg Baum
Georg Baum wrote: > The attached patch partly fixes bug 1231 (graphics filename extensions can > be wrong when exporting .tex). > It is best to omit the extension entirely, because LaTeX chooses the best > format in this case. The problem is that this does not work if the > filename without extens

Re: LYX 1.3.1 can't find library

2004-04-23 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ah, those PEEK & POKE days... (but I really miss my ORIC-1 a lot more) Me too I used that ORIC a lot... -- Lgb

Re: LYX 1.3.1 can't find library

2004-04-23 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Martin Vermeer wrote: > The C64 was the Windows of its day. Nice to poke fun at... nice pun... ah, those PEEK & POKE days... (but I really miss my ORIC-1 a lot more) Alfredo

Re: tex2lyx

2004-04-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 03:12:00PM -0500, Varlen Grabski wrote: > Andre, > Thank you very much for information. > Is it possible to get binary? Probably. But you'd have to tell us what kind of machine you are using... Andre'

Re: Buglet: gtk+ frontend

2004-04-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:47:53AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > I've recently seen a presentation on the subversion/submaster combo and > > I was pretty impressed, especially with it's 'offline capabilities'. > > Um, are you sure

Re: LYX 1.3.1 can't find library

2004-04-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 11:59:20PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thusly: > > I was mildly offended by that. > suppressed> Using Moore's LAW that computer power doubles every 18 months, > > a compile now taking 12 minutes would have taken 2 months, 26 days in > > 1984. Not to mention the time