Outline mode?

2005-08-14 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
This page: http://tinyurl.com/8lyh3 talks about LyX in the following way: Text editor with Outline mode, e.g. MS Word (http://www.microsoft.com/office/), LyX (http://www.lyx.org/) or Emacs (http://www.xemacs.org/). Outline mode enables you to fold headings and move complete "nodes" (chapters,

Re: [Patch] Workaround crash in gtk/xftFontMetrics.C

2005-08-14 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > An assertion signals that something is wrong; by their very nature we > > cannot be positive as to what the issue is. In particular the risk of > > silent corruption becomes a lot larger. > > Not if we tell the user and give him a

Re: Ad. Boost 1.33.

2005-08-14 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:40:04PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > What is missing for a 1.4 release now? I'd be happy for the current 1.4 targetted bug list to get fixed (and any real stoppers). Things are looking really good for me. regards john

Re: exporting from within cgi environment

2005-08-14 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Andre Poenitz # on Sunday 14 August 2005 12:56 am: >On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:11:19PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> An update on this problem and a few questions... >> >> I've traced the hang into src/lyxtextclass.C - >> LyXTextClass::load(). Specifically, the following line

Re: exporting from within cgi environment

2005-08-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:11:19PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote: > Hi all, > > An update on this problem and a few questions... > > I've traced the hang into src/lyxtextclass.C - LyXTextClass::load(). > Specifically, the following line (~855) is where execution heads toward > 500MB. Is your cgi

Re: [Patch] Workaround crash in gtk/xftFontMetrics.C

2005-08-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 07:52:37PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:56:22PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Btw, I don't really like BOOST_ASSERT (as well as the 'traditional' > > ASSERT) as it does not offer a possibility to specify what should happen > > in the failure cas

Re: Patch for bug #1920

2005-08-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:51:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:30:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > >> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> > ... Actually... since we are not _really_ working on the front it > >> > won'

Re: Ad. Boost 1.33.

2005-08-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 02:38:31PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | And as the noisy bugger who was shouting in your ear --- well done! > > I still think it would be better to include it... What is missing for a 1.4 release now? Andre'

Re: [new PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-08-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 05:28:29PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And what about the counters patch? And what about that inverse-dvi-search patch? Shouldn't that have been in for a while now? Andre'