Re: http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX137pre

2005-11-05 Thread Luis Rivera
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > http://www.lyx.org/~leeming/lyx-1.3.7cvs.tar.gz > Angus, The source code at this URL seems to have disappeared. Is it on the wiki page? Thanks. Luis.

Missing latex classes in the lyx package

2005-11-05 Thread Edjard Mota
Hi, I am Ubuntu user and got LyX from its repository, but it seems that the examples in /usr/share/lyx/examples, like aa_sample.lyx are using non-default LaTeX classes. Please forgive me if I am wrong. A message such as ... Textclass error The document uses a missing TeX class "aa".

Re: Collaborative editing with lyx?

2005-11-05 Thread chr
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Andreas Vox wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:25:59PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > LATEX/LYX is used very often in science to write publications. Most of > > > the > > > time there is not only one author, but

Re: Collaborative editing with lyx?

2005-11-05 Thread Andreas Vox
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:25:59PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > LATEX/LYX is used very often in science to write publications. Most of the > > time there is not only one author, but two or more. Has anyone thought > > about a possibility of

Re: Collaborative editing with lyx?

2005-11-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:32:41PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > and stuff... but one process with multiple view migh be possible, when | > we get multi-bufferviews of same buffer. | | How would that work with multiple people? Open up a window

Re: lyx-1.4 cvs assertion crash when resetting "wrong" language]

2005-11-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:11:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Martin> wrote: >> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Martin> I don't understand this at all. >> You mean what I wrote above? Martin> I