> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo, would it be possible to put all the code to generate pot files in
python script(s) that could be used by both autotools and scons? I
prefer that to having two code bases. And getting rid of a awk
dependency is good in any case.
JMarc
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Wasn't there something with a status file also?
Not really.
JMarc
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:17:54 +
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 March 2007 10:15:43 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >>
> > >> Martin's patch for citation.
> >
> > Martin> Any opinion on that one?
> >
> >
Run
$ cd po
# make layouts_l10n.pot,
translations for
#: lib/layouts/siamltex.layout:52
msgid "End."
msgstr ""
and
#: lib/layouts/stdlists.inc:103
msgid "#*"
msgstr ""
are wrong in layouts_l10n.pot.
Cheers,
Bo
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 10:15:43 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> Martin's patch for citation.
>
> Martin> Any opinion on that one?
>
> It looks good to me.
What are you waiting Martin? ;-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:01:58PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> just as you suggest? Ie, let the makefile perform the concatenation?
> >>> It's an interesting suggestion.
> >> I've added this feature to the cmake build:
> >>
> >> cmake ../trunk/development/cmake -Dmerge=1
> >>
> >> then al
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 08:03:20PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> The attached patch implements caching of the rbearing values as they are
> now used in mathed when positioning superscripts. Without this patch, on
> Windows the dreaded csrss.exe thing comes back eating cpu cycles and
> scrolling
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> files multiple merged (in minutes)
>> -- cmake msvc debug 17
>> 9 cmake msvc release 19 10 Linux cmake 21 11 Linux auto/make 54 --
>>
>>
>> Is make really so slow?
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Martin's patch for citation.
Martin> Any opinion on that one?
It looks good to me.
JMarc
Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> files multiple merged (in minutes)
> --
> cmake msvc debug 17 9
> cmake msvc release 19 10
> Linux cmake 21 11
> Linux auto/make 54 --
>
>
> Is make really so slow? I've cal
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Linux auto/make 54 --
It's not that slow because of linking.
Linking takes only 30 seconds or so.
Peter
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:14:49AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:45:29PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Given that your solution to the problems that the compiler has with the
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:52:15PM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 March 2007 9:49:29 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Georg Baum wrote:
> > > PS: I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP
> >
> > Good question what's the status and what's left?
>
> Wha
Jan,
You can find a binary at
http://www.charmec.chalmers.se/temp/
If somebody could place it on the lyx ftp it would be good.
Best regards
/Anders
Jan Peters
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:02:40 -0800
Hey guys,
is there a binary of the 1.5beta for Mac/powerpc? One of my friends
(CC'd) would love to hav
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:03:04PM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Sunday 18 March 2007 6:42:05 am Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > PS: For some strange reason I have the impression that whenever LyX
> > development get the choice between two options, it chooses the one that
> > hurt most.
>
> I remember th
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:01:29PM +, José Matos wrote:
> >[ ] For some undisclosed technical reason that I will never be told
> >about.
>
> To simulate a clean build without any contamination from the surrounding
> environment.
If the result is the same working package in both
The attached patch implements caching of the rbearing values as they are
now used in mathed when positioning superscripts. Without this patch, on
Windows the dreaded csrss.exe thing comes back eating cpu cycles and
scrolling with lots of math is noticeably slowed down.
I plan to commit it later to
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 10:01:16 am John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
>> It should be feasible to parse the output of diff and convert it to
>> a Change Tracking enabled .lyx file. Any interest in such a
>> converter?
José> Interest - yes, th
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Friday 16 March 2007 5:17:24 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I think as Georg (who is always right, as everybody knows by now).
José> Wise guy. :-)
José> Do you have any objection of principle to its inclusion?
No.
JMarc
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:14:49AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:45:29PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given that your solution to the problems tha
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:14:49AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:45:29PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Given that your solution to the problems that the compiler has with the
José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 9:53:02 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/lstrings.C
>> URL:
>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/lstrings.C?rev=174
>> 94
>> ==
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 9:23:56 am Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> One solution would be to define a isNeeded() for this use case, and
> still use isRequired in the few cases where this makes sense.
The patch seems quite interesting indeed. I think that it is not yet ready
to beta 2 but I woul
On Friday 16 March 2007 5:17:24 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think as Georg (who is always right, as everybody knows by now).
Wise guy. :-)
Do you have any objection of principle to its inclusion?
If not I think it should be included.
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 10:01:16 am John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> It should be feasible to parse the output of diff and convert it to a
> Change Tracking enabled .lyx file. Any interest in such a converter?
Interest - yes, this is a recurring theme, time to do it - no. :-)
We have been discussing
On Sunday 18 March 2007 6:42:05 am Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS: For some strange reason I have the impression that whenever LyX
> development get the choice between two options, it chooses the one that
> hurt most.
I remember that sometimes you were involved in some of those choices. ;-)
--
José A
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Von: Dimitrios Galanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: 21. März 2007 17:23:03 MEZ
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Lyx and texlive
Hello Andreas,
I found your email from the lyx help menu.
when I try to install lyx1.4.4 on a mac that has texlive2007, the
lyx i
On Monday 19 March 2007 5:11:49 pm Andre Poenitz wrote:
> In some very successful attempt to waste some time I run 'make rpmdist'
> and now have a few questions (apart from the obvoius 'Is it really
> supposed to fail?' and possibly 'Why?')
>
> 1. Why contain 3781 out of 7528 file names in the .tar
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 8:14:50 am Georg Baum wrote:
> PS: I fail to understand either why you bring up issues like compile times
> and rpmdist. I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP, but
> obviously this is not true and it is more important to discuss some
> fundamental changes like
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 9:49:29 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Georg Baum wrote:
> > PS: I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP
>
> Good question what's the status and what's left?
What are the important patches missing?
There is the patch from Bernhard t
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 9:53:02 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/lstrings.C
> URL:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/lstrings.C?rev=174
>94
> ===
>=== --- lyx-devel/t
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 05:11:51PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> With the attached patch LyX correctly positions superscripts accounting
> for the real width of the nucleus. I also attach two screenshots showing
> a formula before and after the patch.
>
> I'll commit it tomorrow if I don't get
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:30:32AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
[I am surprised you are able to link LyX. After all, swapping during.
linking was the reason I bought my laptop with 512 MB to _link_ LyX,
not to compile it. Are you sure you measure what you think you do?]
It i
Hi!
I forward this to the list since I'm not familiar with .scpt files...
/Andreas
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Von: Dimitrios Galanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: 21. März 2007 17:23:03 MEZ
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Lyx and texlive
Hello Andreas,
I found your email from the lyx
On 3/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Georg Baum wrote:
> PS: I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP
Good question what's the status and what's left?
A second beta wouldn't hurt. It has been a month since the last one.
--
John C. McCabe-
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:14:50AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> PS: I fail to understand either why you bring up issues like compile times
> and rpmdist. I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP, but
> obviously this is not true and it is more important to discuss some
> fundamental changes
José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 March 2007 8:46:08 am Georg Baum wrote:
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> can you please add the missing boost file?
>
> Could you (please) do it?
IIRC Lars has some special procedure for updating the boost stuff and wants
to do that himself, therefore I asked him first.
I
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 8:46:08 am Georg Baum wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> can you please add the missing boost file?
Could you (please) do it?
> Georg
--
José Abílio
Ok, bug 3363 is yours.
Helge Hafting
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Georg Baum wrote:
PS: I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP
Good question what's the status and what's left?
Jose'?
/Christian
(I know we need to get back on the installer issues - my work on that got
sidetracked due to the server crash. But let's pleas
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I forgot to add that I do not know how std::set works, so my code
>> could be bogus (but at least it compiles :).
Martin> From what I remember it is valid...
Very good.
JMarc
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:48:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller
Martin> wrote:
>> Martin Vermeer wrote: > Which changelog? They haven't been updated
>> since somewhere october last > year.
>>
>> Look twice: http://www.lyx.org/trac/
Hi Lars,
can you please add the missing boost file?
Georg
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel]Bug#415636: lyx_1.5.0~beta1-1
(experimental/ia64/alkman): Internal boost copy not working on ia64
Date: Dienstag 20 März 2007 23:28
From: Marc 'HE' Br
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:14:49AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Index: src/support/filetools.C
>> ===
>> --- src/support/filetools.C (Revision 17495)
>> +++ src/support/filetools.C (Arbeitskopie)
>> @@ -67,7
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:30:32AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>> >
>> >>[I am surprised you are able to link LyX. After all, swapping during.
>> >>linking was the reason I bought my laptop with 512 MB to _link_ LyX,
>> >>not to compile it. Are you sure you measure what you
45 matches
Mail list logo