Re: awk bug in po/Makefile.in.in

2007-03-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bo, would it be possible to put all the code to generate pot files in python script(s) that could be used by both autotools and scons? I prefer that to having two code bases. And getting rid of a awk dependency is good in any case. JMarc

Re: Getting LyX 1.5.0 out?

2007-03-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Wasn't there something with a status file also? Not really. JMarc

Re: Getting LyX 1.5.0 out?

2007-03-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:17:54 + José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 21 March 2007 10:15:43 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > > >> Martin's patch for citation. > > > > Martin> Any opinion on that one? > > > >

awk bug in po/Makefile.in.in

2007-03-21 Thread Bo Peng
Run $ cd po # make layouts_l10n.pot, translations for #: lib/layouts/siamltex.layout:52 msgid "End." msgstr "" and #: lib/layouts/stdlists.inc:103 msgid "#*" msgstr "" are wrong in layouts_l10n.pot. Cheers, Bo

Re: Getting LyX 1.5.0 out?

2007-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 10:15:43 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> Martin's patch for citation. > > Martin> Any opinion on that one? > > It looks good to me. What are you waiting Martin? ;-) > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:01:58PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > just as you suggest? Ie, let the makefile perform the concatenation? > >>> It's an interesting suggestion. > >> I've added this feature to the cmake build: > >> > >> cmake ../trunk/development/cmake -Dmerge=1 > >> > >> then al

Re: [patch] rbearing cache

2007-03-21 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 08:03:20PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > The attached patch implements caching of the rbearing values as they are > now used in mathed when positioning superscripts. Without this patch, on > Windows the dreaded csrss.exe thing comes back eating cpu cycles and > scrolling

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> Peter Kümmel wrote: >> files multiple merged (in minutes) >> -- cmake msvc debug 17 >> 9 cmake msvc release 19 10 Linux cmake 21 11 Linux auto/make 54 -- >> >> >> Is make really so slow?

Re: Getting LyX 1.5.0 out?

2007-03-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Martin's patch for citation. Martin> Any opinion on that one? It looks good to me. JMarc

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Peter Kümmel
Peter Kümmel wrote: > > files multiple merged (in minutes) > -- > cmake msvc debug 17 9 > cmake msvc release 19 10 > Linux cmake 21 11 > Linux auto/make 54 -- > > > Is make really so slow? I've cal

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Peter Kümmel
Peter Kümmel wrote: > Linux auto/make 54 -- It's not that slow because of linking. Linking takes only 30 seconds or so. Peter

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Peter Kümmel
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:14:49AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Andre Poenitz wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:45:29PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Given that your solution to the problems that the compiler has with the

Re: Getting LyX 1.5.0 out? (Was: Compile times)

2007-03-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:52:15PM +, José Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 21 March 2007 9:49:29 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Georg Baum wrote: > > > PS: I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP > > > > Good question what's the status and what's left? > > Wha

Re: 1.5beta for powerpc

2007-03-21 Thread Anders Ekberg
Jan, You can find a binary at http://www.charmec.chalmers.se/temp/ If somebody could place it on the lyx ftp it would be good. Best regards /Anders Jan Peters Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:02:40 -0800 Hey guys, is there a binary of the 1.5beta for Mac/powerpc? One of my friends (CC'd) would love to hav

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:03:04PM +, José Matos wrote: > On Sunday 18 March 2007 6:42:05 am Andre Poenitz wrote: > > PS: For some strange reason I have the impression that whenever LyX > > development get the choice between two options, it chooses the one that > > hurt most. > > I remember th

Re: make rpmdist

2007-03-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:01:29PM +, José Matos wrote: > >[ ] For some undisclosed technical reason that I will never be told > >about. > > To simulate a clean build without any contamination from the surrounding > environment. If the result is the same working package in both

[patch] rbearing cache

2007-03-21 Thread Enrico Forestieri
The attached patch implements caching of the rbearing values as they are now used in mathed when positioning superscripts. Without this patch, on Windows the dreaded csrss.exe thing comes back eating cpu cycles and scrolling with lots of math is noticeably slowed down. I plan to commit it later to

Re: Thought about the file format

2007-03-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 10:01:16 am John McCabe-Dansted wrote: >> It should be feasible to parse the output of diff and convert it to >> a Change Tracking enabled .lyx file. Any interest in such a >> converter? José> Interest - yes, th

Re: what about the patch for lyxlex / bug 3293?

2007-03-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> On Friday 16 March 2007 5:17:24 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I think as Georg (who is always right, as everybody knows by now). José> Wise guy. :-) José> Do you have any objection of principle to its inclusion? No. JMarc

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Peter Kümmel
Peter Kümmel wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:14:49AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >>> Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:45:29PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Given that your solution to the problems tha

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Peter Kümmel
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:14:49AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Andre Poenitz wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:45:29PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Given that your solution to the problems that the compiler has with the

Re: [Cvslog] r17494 - in /lyx-devel/trunk/src: format.C graphics/Previ...

2007-03-21 Thread Peter Kümmel
José Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 20 March 2007 9:53:02 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/lstrings.C >> URL: >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/lstrings.C?rev=174 >> 94 >> ==

Re: Getting citep etc. to work for egs.cls

2007-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 9:23:56 am Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > One solution would be to define a isNeeded() for this use case, and > still use isRequired in the few cases where this makes sense. The patch seems quite interesting indeed. I think that it is not yet ready to beta 2 but I woul

Re: what about the patch for lyxlex / bug 3293?

2007-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Friday 16 March 2007 5:17:24 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I think as Georg (who is always right, as everybody knows by now). Wise guy. :-) Do you have any objection of principle to its inclusion? If not I think it should be included. > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: Thought about the file format

2007-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 10:01:16 am John McCabe-Dansted wrote: > It should be feasible to parse the output of diff and convert it to a > Change Tracking enabled .lyx file. Any interest in such a converter? Interest - yes, this is a recurring theme, time to do it - no. :-) We have been discussing

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Sunday 18 March 2007 6:42:05 am Andre Poenitz wrote: > PS: For some strange reason I have the impression that whenever LyX > development get the choice between two options, it chooses the one that > hurt most. I remember that sometimes you were involved in some of those choices. ;-) -- José A

Re: Lyx and texlive

2007-03-21 Thread Bennett Helm
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: Von: Dimitrios Galanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Datum: 21. März 2007 17:23:03 MEZ An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Lyx and texlive Hello Andreas, I found your email from the lyx help menu. when I try to install lyx1.4.4 on a mac that has texlive2007, the lyx i

Re: make rpmdist

2007-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Monday 19 March 2007 5:11:49 pm Andre Poenitz wrote: > In some very successful attempt to waste some time I run 'make rpmdist' > and now have a few questions (apart from the obvoius 'Is it really > supposed to fail?' and possibly 'Why?') > > 1. Why contain 3781 out of 7528 file names in the .tar

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 8:14:50 am Georg Baum wrote: > PS: I fail to understand either why you bring up issues like compile times > and rpmdist. I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP, but > obviously this is not true and it is more important to discuss some > fundamental changes like

Re: Getting LyX 1.5.0 out? (Was: Compile times)

2007-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 9:49:29 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Georg Baum wrote: > > PS: I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP > > Good question what's the status and what's left? What are the important patches missing? There is the patch from Bernhard t

Re: [Cvslog] r17494 - in /lyx-devel/trunk/src: format.C graphics/Previ...

2007-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 9:53:02 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/lstrings.C > URL: > http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/lstrings.C?rev=174 >94 > === >=== --- lyx-devel/t

Re: [patch] correct superscript kerning

2007-03-21 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 05:11:51PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > With the attached patch LyX correctly positions superscripts accounting > for the real width of the nucleus. I also attach two screenshots showing > a formula before and after the patch. > > I'll commit it tomorrow if I don't get

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Dov Feldstern
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:30:32AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote: [I am surprised you are able to link LyX. After all, swapping during. linking was the reason I bought my laptop with 512 MB to _link_ LyX, not to compile it. Are you sure you measure what you think you do?] It i

Fwd: Lyx and texlive

2007-03-21 Thread Andreas Vox
Hi! I forward this to the list since I'm not familiar with .scpt files... /Andreas Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: Von: Dimitrios Galanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Datum: 21. März 2007 17:23:03 MEZ An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Lyx and texlive Hello Andreas, I found your email from the lyx

Re: Getting LyX 1.5.0 out? (Was: Compile times)

2007-03-21 Thread John McCabe-Dansted
On 3/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Georg Baum wrote: > PS: I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP Good question what's the status and what's left? A second beta wouldn't hurt. It has been a month since the last one. -- John C. McCabe-

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:14:50AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > PS: I fail to understand either why you bring up issues like compile times > and rpmdist. I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP, but > obviously this is not true and it is more important to discuss some > fundamental changes

Re: LyX does not compile on ia64

2007-03-21 Thread Georg Baum
José Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 21 March 2007 8:46:08 am Georg Baum wrote: >> Hi Lars, >> >> can you please add the missing boost file? > > Could you (please) do it? IIRC Lars has some special procedure for updating the boost stuff and wants to do that himself, therefore I asked him first. I

Re: LyX does not compile on ia64

2007-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 8:46:08 am Georg Baum wrote: > Hi Lars, > > can you please add the missing boost file? Could you (please) do it? > Georg -- José Abílio

Re: Bug: document not "changed" after pasting with mouse click (1.5 svn)

2007-03-21 Thread Helge Hafting
Ok, bug 3363 is yours. Helge Hafting

Getting LyX 1.5.0 out? (Was: Compile times)

2007-03-21 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Georg Baum wrote: PS: I thought that the goal was to get out 1.5.0 ASAP Good question what's the status and what's left? Jose'? /Christian (I know we need to get back on the installer issues - my work on that got sidetracked due to the server crash. But let's pleas

Re: Getting citep etc. to work for egs.cls

2007-03-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I forgot to add that I do not know how std::set works, so my code >> could be bogus (but at least it compiles :). Martin> From what I remember it is valid... Very good. JMarc

Re: Getting citep etc. to work for egs.cls

2007-03-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:48:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller Martin> wrote: >> Martin Vermeer wrote: > Which changelog? They haven't been updated >> since somewhere october last > year. >> >> Look twice: http://www.lyx.org/trac/

LyX does not compile on ia64

2007-03-21 Thread Georg Baum
Hi Lars, can you please add the missing boost file? Georg -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -- Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel]Bug#415636: lyx_1.5.0~beta1-1 (experimental/ia64/alkman): Internal boost copy not working on ia64 Date: Dienstag 20 März 2007 23:28 From: Marc 'HE' Br

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Georg Baum
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:14:49AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Index: src/support/filetools.C >> === >> --- src/support/filetools.C (Revision 17495) >> +++ src/support/filetools.C (Arbeitskopie) >> @@ -67,7

Re: Compile times

2007-03-21 Thread Georg Baum
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:30:32AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote: >> > >> >>[I am surprised you are able to link LyX. After all, swapping during. >> >>linking was the reason I bought my laptop with 512 MB to _link_ LyX, >> >>not to compile it. Are you sure you measure what you