On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:02:15AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > I think that you tried server-goto-file-row with a nonexisting file.
> > I discovered that this leads to a crash and committed a patch:
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29418
>
> Should go to b
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:24:26AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:08:06AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> > > btw have you tried xdvi? lyx crashes here, when xdvi tried to call it.
> >
> > Yes, no problem here.
> >
> > > File does not exist:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:19:15PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Edwin Leuven wrote:
>
>>> imho at least JMarc should have root access too, since contanting Lars is
>>> longlasting problem and not issue of today's sun.
>>
>> i should probably try to bribe lars with a co
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Edwin Leuven wrote:
imho at least JMarc should have root access too, since contanting Lars is
longlasting problem and not issue of today's sun.
i should probably try to bribe lars with a couple of beers next time i am in
oslo...
We could start with JMarc askig Lars for
Helge Hafting writes:
> Robust against infinite loops, but may have some problems of its own.
>
> Because now you have to keep that list of insets up-to-date during
> processing. The operations done by "inset-forall" may change the
> document structure - and the list of "all notes" get outdated. A
sanda wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Mon Apr 27 13:56:31 2009
> New Revision: 29425
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29425
>
> Log:
> backport
For the commit history, it is better if you repeat the original log message,
rather than just write "backport". Or at least, name the revision num
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef:
Le 25 avr. 09 à 00:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
I think this is a battle we cannot win (not tested, but you get the
idea):
inset-forall Note note-insert
So... you look for all Note insets, and execute note-insert for each
and
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Typically, having to reject a gnuplot template is unfortunate, and I did
> read gnuplot sources to try to find out how to work around the potential
> problems (and failed).
as for the gnuplot, i have read discussions on gnuplot lists where
"safe" mode has been discuss
Pavel Sanda writes:
>> I removed this section because it is only more or less wild guessing
>
> no, it states, there is a hole when using user crafted templates,
> and what you call wild guess is just another word for what hackers been
> doing for ages.
>
>> LyX itself is no security hole
>
> in
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:08:06AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > btw have you tried xdvi? lyx crashes here, when xdvi tried to call it.
>
> Yes, no problem here.
>
> > File does not exist: /trash/lyx_tmpdir.T19256/lyx_tmpbuf0/Tutorial.dvi
> > ASSERT: "!isEmpty()" in
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> So the only way is to define a
> template and provide a LyX file including a malicious script file.
yes and i understand that section as warning when writing such a template.
> But even
> when you get such a file, you first need to install the needed template.
yes
> And eve
11 matches
Mail list logo
