Since r30619, LyX crashes when:
1. New File,
2. Enter "x"
3. Unicode-insert 302
4. Generate latex.
This is because runparams.local_font is null in
Paragraph::Private::latexSurrogatePair.
Vincent
bb wrote:
> I do not know which couple of days you are in Berlin. I will leave
> Berlin in Monday (July 20th) and come back on Tuesday (July 23rd). I am
> a normal user (not a dev). If I do not disturb and if you dont mnd, I
> would join you and your dev-crowd if you tell me where and when. BTW in
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Wednesday is just fine.
ok so lets fix at least wednesday evening.
8 pm? 9 pm?
> > i would let the place choice to you - you know better then me where the beer
> > is good.
>
> Not really. I am rarely in the city center, and even less so in
there is no need to be in the c
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:20:40PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > anybody from the berliner crowd interested in a pub meet for a beer or
> > > two?
> >
> > Define "next days".
>
> sat 18. - thu 23./fri 24.
> to me the most convenient would be wednesday evening, but it can easily change
> accord
Am Freitag 17 Juli 2009 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 07:52:24PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > i'll be staying next days in berlin.
> > > anybody from the berliner crowd interested in a pub meet for a beer or
> > > two?
> >
> > Define "next days
Le 16 juil. 09 à 08:01, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Looking at status.16x, I see a long, steadily growing list, so I
think it's
time for some planning.
b.) tex2lyx issues
#5702 tex2lyx cannot deal with modules
#6059 New tex2lyx preamble parsing scheme breaks roundtrip
Since I will be u
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Can I start backporting the fixes for the following bugs:
5998, 2034, 2213, 3706, 3918, 4177, 4509, 4952, 5390, 5435, 5458,
5944,
5948 ?
Yes. Please post the pa
Am Freitag, den 17.07.2009, 21:33 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> bb wrote:
> > Pavel Sanda schrieb:
> >> hi,
> >> i'll be staying next days in berlin.
> >> anybody from the berliner crowd interested in a pub meet for a beer or
> >> two?
> >> pavel
> >>
> > May be you are looking for a spacy locat
bb wrote:
> Pavel Sanda schrieb:
>> hi,
>> i'll be staying next days in berlin.
>> anybody from the berliner crowd interested in a pub meet for a beer or
>> two?
>> pavel
>>
> May be you are looking for a spacy location? Have a look at:
the crowd was a bit ironic since i'm currently aware of o
rgheck schreef:
On 07/17/2009 02:11 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
An error message you do not want to get (from some highly
sophisticated piece of software) :
Whoops. If the attached looks OK, please commit.
By the way, did you do this as a check, or ar
On 07/17/2009 02:11 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
An error message you do not want to get (from some highly
sophisticated piece of software) :
Whoops. If the attached looks OK, please commit.
By the way, did you do this as a check, or are you actually mi
bb schreef:
Pavel Sanda schrieb:
hi,
i'll be staying next days in berlin.
anybody from the berliner crowd interested in a pub meet for a beer
or two?
pavel
May be you are looking for a spacy location? Have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-base
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-base
h
Pavel Sanda schrieb:
hi,
i'll be staying next days in berlin.
anybody from the berliner crowd interested in a pub meet for a beer or two?
pavel
May be you are looking for a spacy location? Have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-base
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-base
http://www.c-bas
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
An error message you do not want to get (from some highly
sophisticated piece of software) :
Vincent
<>
An error message you do not want to get (from some highly sophisticated
piece of software) :
Vincent
Am Freitag 17 Juli 2009 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> hi,
> i'll be staying next days in berlin.
> anybody from the berliner crowd interested in a pub meet for a beer or two?
> pavel
I am.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
hi,
i'll be staying next days in berlin.
anybody from the berliner crowd interested in a pub meet for a beer or two?
pavel
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >> My patch is ready to go in I think. The only thing that is missing is
> >> visual feedback for the indentation width. As LyX source code is not
> >
> > you have totally ignored my previous questions, and i'm especially
> > interested in the first one.
>
> What do you mean? Eve
rgheck wrote:
> And even include status.16x.
bravo! :-)
Jürgen
On 07/17/2009 02:56 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
This was caused by r29839. I don't immediately see why, however. Jurgen?
Hm. The backtrace doesn't indicate it's related to that change. Rather to
spell checking changes:
I get a quote different backtrace, oddly eno
On 07/17/2009 02:25 AM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:10 AM, rgheck wrote:
On 07/16/2009 06:24 PM, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Fri Jul 17 00:24:39 2009
New Revision: 30636
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/30636
Minor nitpick: s/co
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb:
> >> + Length indentation;
> >
> > Why not HSpace indentation?
>
> The last email you suggested to introduce an HspaceKind enum to Length, now
> I should leave Length untouched but introduce an HSpace class.
No, you probably misunderstood me. I
Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb:
+ Length indentation;
Why not HSpace indentation?
The last email you suggested to introduce an HspaceKind enum to Length, now I should leave Length
untouched but introduce an HSpace class. I don't have time right now to play longer with this issue.
Please t
>> My patch is ready to go in I think. The only thing that is missing is
>> visual feedback for the indentation width. As LyX source code is not
>
> you have totally ignored my previous questions, and i'm especially
> interested in the first one.
What do you mean? Everything you mentioned in
htt
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> My patch is ready to go in I think. The only thing that is missing is
> visual feedback for the indentation width. As LyX source code is not
you have totally ignored my previous questions, and i'm especially
interested in the first one.
pavel
rgheck wrote:
> This was caused by r29839. I don't immediately see why, however. Jurgen?
Hm. The backtrace doesn't indicate it's related to that change. Rather to
spell checking changes:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x75e62645 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
26 matches
Mail list logo
