Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> What about branch?
OK if you're quick. LyX 1.6.9 is due on Monday.
Jürgen
Am Freitag, 4. Februar 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> > So long, as it were not version 2.8.2. This one is buggy at generating
> > debian package. The verion 2.8.0 is ok though.
>
> Tried "cpack -G DEB --config CPackConfig.cmake" with the current cmake
> (git) master version and got no errors, so th
On 02/03/2011 07:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
How to export the minimal set of files necessary to have a working LyX document?
i'm not sure it will work, but you may want to look on lyxpak.py which states:
# This script creates a tar or zip archive with a lyx file and all incl
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a way to force LyX to flush the stderr (LYXERR() messages) while
> it is running ? For example, an LFUN forcing that ?
no such lfun, why/where you need it?
pavel
Hi,
is there a way to force LyX to flush the stderr (LYXERR() messages)
while it is running ? For example, an LFUN forcing that ?
Thx,
T.
Paul Johnson wrote:
> How to export the minimal set of files necessary to have a working LyX
> document?
i'm not sure it will work, but you may want to look on lyxpak.py which states:
# This script creates a tar or zip archive with a lyx file and all included
# files (graphics and so on). A zip
Hello,
When we were talking about creating a tar.gz package for shipping LyX
from user to user, I was not interested. But now I see that something
like that would be handy. I've got lots and lots of image files in my
document folder, but after cutting, trimming, re-organizing, I did
not use very
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 00:21, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> wiki newinlyx20 is waiting for you.
done
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:16:08AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > then ok.
>
> it's a pleasure doing business with you guys:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37471
First bug report:
1) Set table width
2) Save and close document
3) Reopen document
4) Table width field i
So long, as it were not version 2.8.2. This one is buggy at generating debian
package. The verion 2.8.0 is ok though.
Tried "cpack -G DEB --config CPackConfig.cmake" with the current cmake (git)
master version and got no
errors, so there is hope.
Peter
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > then ok.
>
> it's a pleasure doing business with you guys:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37471
wiki newinlyx20 is waiting for you.
> i will do the docs in a bit (this weekend).
>
> how does it work: we edit the relevant doc with trunk (with
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> then ok.
it's a pleasure doing business with you guys:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37471
i will do the docs in a bit (this weekend).
how does it work: we edit the relevant doc with trunk (with change tracking on)?
ed.
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:03:18AM +0100, for...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: forenr
> Date: Fri Feb 4 00:03:18 2011
> New Revision: 37470
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37470
>
> Log:
> Don't pass the letterpaper option to the geometry package when using
> default paper format and margins
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:30:14PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > While performing some tests to check Georg's bug #3016 resolution,
> > I found what I think might be another unrelated bug in branch and trunk:
> > when
> > * paper format is set to de
Le 03/02/2011 17:37, Richard Heck a écrit :
Trac isn't responding.
It seems to work now...
JMarc
On 03.02.2011 21:24, Peter Kümmel wrote:
This would be better discussed on the cmake-developers mailing list.
Indeed, this is the wrong list for this. Somehow I missed that there is a devel
list.
Sorry for the noise, bit it seems I'm on another list with such a idiotic reply
rule where I h
On 03.02.2011 20:04, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 2/3/2011 12:20 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
On 03.02.2011 17:20, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Because good solution is not available
I've added the mentioned namespace support
to CMake:
namespace()
endnamespace()
With attached patch it is possible to write
code l
On 02/03/2011 10:00 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
#7163 - Crash when closing file before pictures are converted
I will try to have a look at this one.
I can no longer reproduce this bug. I used a file with about 150
1000x1000 EPS images, open it and close it immediately, and there is no
crash.
L
On 02/03/2011 11:27 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
In attempting to look at #7163, I have found that graphics are no
longer being converted in the background, after the Buffer loads. The
reason seems to be r29473, which is triggering a metrics calculation
for the whole Buffer that is then forcing ea
Trac isn't responding.
rh
In attempting to look at #7163, I have found that graphics are no longer
being converted in the background, after the Buffer loads. The reason
seems to be r29473, which is triggering a metrics calculation for the
whole Buffer that is then forcing each graphic to be loaded.
Richard
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Shouldn't it be
>
> > +revert = [[410, [revert_langpack]],
Of course. Thanks.
Jürgen
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:17:32PM +0100, sp...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: spitz
> Date: Thu Feb 3 15:17:31 2011
> New Revision: 37457
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37457
>
> Log:
> * Allow to set language package on a per-document basis (fixes bug 2909).
>
> File format change. Commit
On 2/2/2011 5:15 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
The latter, 1.6.9svn, in this case, and 2.0svn, as well. I don't
suspect anything has changed that would have affected this, though.
The difference may be that the share, in my case, is sitting on a
Linux machine running Samba.
Anyway, if you want t
On 02/03/2011 09:35 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Can you please remind us what these are?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome at the bottom are bugs target to
2.0.
in particular:
#6871 - Missing screen update can cause assertion after lyxserver communication
#6879 - Asse
Richard Heck wrote:
> Can you please remind us what these are?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome at the bottom are bugs target to
2.0.
in particular:
#7163 - Crash when closing file before pictures are converted
#6871 - Missing screen update can cause assertion after lyxserver communic
On 02/03/2011 09:17 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I wonder if we want to get out LyX 2.0 eventually.
yes :( we wait for 1 critical and three majors bugs.
anybody around to have a look ?
Can you please remind us what these are?
3. documentation is added as well, Uwe is go
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Not, it is sensible to support both (eventually). of course, supporting only
> tabular* now and adding tabularx for 2.1 is also OK.
then ok.
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> the proposed patch does not look intrusive, so it can go into when
> 1. the correctness of latex part is argued.
>i havent seen any reaction on the tabularx question raised by Juergen
>and my knowledge of latex tables is not enough to judge it myself.
>there is no p
I agree with Jurgen's previous judgement that this patch is actually
very simple. I do not think it can add any regressions and so think it
should go in, if people think it is really useful.
Minor comments below.
Richard
Index: development/FORMAT
===
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I wonder if we want to get out LyX 2.0 eventually.
yes :( we wait for 1 critical and three majors bugs.
anybody around to have a look ?
the proposed patch does not look intrusive, so it can go into when
1. the correctness of latex part is argued.
i havent seen any
Richard Heck wrote:
> Things get discussed, and we won't always be happy. That, indeed, is life.
i think nobody disagrees with this
this being said, i would argue for some pragmatism (over principles):
the patch is small and i think many people crave it (at least abdel
and enrico ;-)
i'll shut
On 02/03/2011 07:11 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:29:58PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
But I shut up. Pavel is the one to decide (also on my today's proposal, BTW,
which also entails a file format change, and for which I would be completely
fine if Pavel said "nope
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Apart from jokes, that's an issue with whatever dialog.
i was not talking about dialogs i was talking about menu.
pavel
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:29:58PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Isn't this a discussion?
>
> Is it really the right time now for such discussions? Is it really apt to
> consider the release of an RC if new features are still being considered?
I think Pavel ment
Am 02.02.2011 um 11:41 schrieb Edwin Leuven:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:12, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Sorry, one changed file was missing in patch.
>> This is the complete patch.
>
> ok, this works great for me. thanks!
Now I've finished the patch.
- Fix a glitch when going from text to math.
- A
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Isn't this a discussion?
Is it really the right time now for such discussions? Is it really apt to
consider the release of an RC if new features are still being considered?
But I shut up. Pavel is the one to decide (also on my today's proposal, BTW,
which also entails
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:01:55PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > Too late IMHO. You had ample time to propose this patch.
> >
> > Well, it depends on whether it is a big or small change, right?
>
> Yes, of course. This strikes me rather a large feature addition
Le 03/02/2011 12:11, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
And a check for luatex version? This one can be done in configure.py in
a safe way.
I don't think it's a matter of the luatex version. The fontspec version is at
issue here.
OK, another possibility is extend checkL
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> And a check for luatex version? This one can be done in configure.py in
> a safe way.
I don't think it's a matter of the luatex version. The fontspec version is at
issue here.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > Too late IMHO. You had ample time to propose this patch.
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, it depends on whether it is a big or small change, right?
>
> Yes, of course. This strikes me rather a large feature addition at this
> stage of the developme
Le 03/02/2011 12:06, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
That means, we should (ideally) disable LuaTeX support if fontspec is older
than 2010/07/11. The rest (using "Ligatures=TeX" for both XeTeX and LuaTeX
after 2010/07/11) is rather cosmetics.
I think that the current solution is OK. However, a chec
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> From what I understand the problem is with passing some option to
> fontspec.sty, right? Could you give me an executive summary? Is the
> problem that luatex will not work at all when fontspec is too old? Can't
> check the luatex version to assert this?
The problem
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Too late IMHO. You had ample time to propose this patch.
>
> Well, it depends on whether it is a big or small change, right?
Yes, of course. This strikes me rather a large feature addition at this stage
of the development. It needs testing and some discussion (e.g.,
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Well, it depends on whether it is a big or small change, right?
the change itself is small...
Le 03/02/2011 08:33, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
One thing to consider is that chkconfigure.ltx is not a usual LaTeX document.
It does not have a preamble and a body (i.e., no \documentclass and
\begin{document}). AFAIU, \@onlypreamble gets activated by \documentclass and
deactivated by \begin{d
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 11:19:27AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > opinions?
>
> Too late IMHO. You had ample time to propose this patch.
Well, it depends on whether it is a big or small change, right?
--
Enrico
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:07:38AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> would people be interested in having tabular* support?
Yes, this is a big deficiency in LyX and achieving the same effect
is troublesome.
--
Enrico
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:07:50AM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Il 10/01/2011 23:54, Enrico Forestieri ha scritto:
> >On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 03:45:04PM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> >>For example, like in the attached patch, realizing:
> >>
> >>+msgstr "Maiuscolo/min&uscolo"
> >However, t
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> opinions?
Too late IMHO. You had ample time to propose this patch.
Jürgen
Il 03/02/2011 01:05, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
Tommaso, as said going to menu works only with delay stroke like 500ms.
menu effects eats keys otherwise.
half a sec!! oh my!! eh eh, I would argue autotests has just found a bug
in your window manager :-)
Apart from jokes, that's an issue with wha
On 02/03/2011 10:07 AM, Edwin Leuven wrote:
would people be interested in having tabular* support?
that means: setting the table width to say the textwidth, which in
latex then gives
\begin{tabular*}{1\textwidth}{@{\extracolsep{\fill}}|c|c|c|c|}
...
the attached patch add this option to the t
Il 03/02/2011 01:19, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
this kbd tool seems to lock randomly my keyboard.
it is locked after the test and take some time with mouse focusing to get the
keyboard back.
even worse happen when i change desktop, getting keyboard back to work needs
magic.
killing the whole test
53 matches
Mail list logo