Jim Oldfield wrote:
> (1b) (raised by devs) Should we make non-proper nouns in the middle of the
> sentence (like "a big Cat") wrong?
>
> My opinion is no! If even Word's grammar checker doesn't try to figure this
> out, I think it's very ambitious for LyX's spell checker to try (admittedly
> LyX
On 14.05.2011 01:01, Rob Oakes wrote:
Thanks Peter,
It's fixed. It's possible to build with external and internal libintl now.
Thanks for taking a look at it. For some reason, I still kept having problems
(even after deleting my build directory and CMakeLists.txt.user). It still kept
trying
On 14.05.2011 01:12, Rob Oakes wrote:
It's fixed. It's possible to build with external and internal libintl now.
Thanks for taking a look at it. For some reason, I still kept having problems
(even after deleting my build directory and CMakeLists.txt.user). It still kept
trying to use the exte
>> It's fixed. It's possible to build with external and internal libintl now.
>
> Thanks for taking a look at it. For some reason, I still kept having problems
> (even after deleting my build directory and CMakeLists.txt.user). It still
> kept trying to use the external libintl.
>
> So ... I we
Thanks Peter,
> It's fixed. It's possible to build with external and internal libintl now.
Thanks for taking a look at it. For some reason, I still kept having problems
(even after deleting my build directory and CMakeLists.txt.user). It still kept
trying to use the external libintl.
So ... I
On 05/13/2011 02:55 PM, J. Gardner wrote:
> To start, I want to thank all of the developers for their great work
> making LyX 2.0!
>
> Second, since there have been a number of crashing bugs fixed, is
> there a planned release date for 2.0.1?
>
Not yet, but it will probably be early, as these thing
On 05/13/2011 03:10 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>
>>> 0002 seems correct.
> If you really want comments:
>
> It seems you've done something strange to the whitespacing.
>
Indeed. I'll fix that.
> I would prefer to rename 'tmp' to 'params_copy'. Then it is
> clearer what it is.
>
Of course.
> I'm not sure about this, but the following does seem like it follows
> from some good principle: If code can go into BufferParams instead of
> Buffer, it should.
Hmm.. I think there should be more to it.
I've been thinking about the Buffer class before. I think it should
only care about manag
To start, I want to thank all of the developers for their great work
making LyX 2.0!
I have noticed that when LyX asserts and closes on Windows, the LyX
process is left running, sometimes resulting in a large number of
invisible background LyX processes. Is this a necessary evil or
something that
"Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" wrote in message
news:4dcd44ce.6090...@lyx.org...
> I'd have to understand what the actual patch is. I did not find it at
> first glance in the zip file.
The subdirectories in the zip file contain the patches. There are quite a
lot of them.
Joost
My last email was an objective list of facts. This one is my opinion.
I'm using English Hunspell, with continuous spell checking turned on.
> From: Jim Oldfield
>
> here is what Word does in English
>
> (1) Words with an Initial Capital are considered as normal, except that
> proper nouns a
On 05/13/2011 10:58 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
>> What about your most recent prefs work? How dangerous?
> No danger, IMHO.
>
OK. Feel free to commit it to branch, too, and thanks for the detailed
explanation.
Richard
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:10:08AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 05/13/2011 02:58 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:51:20PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> >> On 05/12/2011 07:08 PM, for...@lyx.org wrote:
> >>> Author: forenr
> >>> Date: Fri May 13 01:08:50 2011
> >>> New R
Le 13/05/2011 09:48, Kornel a écrit :
1.) No. The definisions in config.h differ from use there.
E.g. in config.h there is either
#define HAVE_ASPRINTF 1
or
/* undef HAVE_ASPRINTF */
while here it is
#define HAVE_ASPRINTF 1
or
#define HAVE_ASPRINTF 0
But why? Does gettext require this f
Le 13/05/2011 09:44, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
MSVC patches and a CMake build system are available at
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/src/
I didn't write this code myself. There used to be SourceForge project
"cgettext" maintaining this, but for unknown reasons it's entirely
gone n
On 05/13/2011 03:24 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 11:36 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> Before I commit these---especially to branch---I thought I'd post them
>> for comment.
>>
>> The 0002 patch shows the real point of this: We do not need to clone the
>> whole Buffer here, but only need
On 05/13/2011 02:58 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:51:20PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 05/12/2011 07:08 PM, for...@lyx.org wrote:
>>> Author: forenr
>>> Date: Fri May 13 01:08:50 2011
>>> New Revision: 38734
>>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38734
>>>
>>> Lo
Just for comparison, here is what Word does in English (this is Word 2010, but
I
think this was the same at least as far back as Word 95).
(1) Words with an Initial Capital are considered as normal, except that proper
nouns are allowed. For instance Cat and Jim are correct, whereas Jmi and jim
I mean my own automatisms, acquired from long practice. In fact, I am quite
dated myself!
Edwin Leuwen explained to me how to get back the old "classical" icons in the
preference settings, therefore I withdraw my "benign remark".
Thanks again for all the work that went into this nice 2.0 version
Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2011 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-build/cmake/lyx-devel/configCompiler.h:54:1:
> warning: this is the location of the previous definition In file included
> from /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/intl/gettextP.h:64, from
> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/in
Am 13.05.2011 um 09:48 schrieb Kornel:
> Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2011 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> > Am 13.05.2011 um 00:06 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org:
> > > Author: kuemmel
> > > Date: Fri May 13 00:06:06 2011
> > > New Revision: 38733
> > > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38733
> > >
> > > Log:
> >
Am 13.05.2011 um 10:21 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> Do we pass to the spell backend whether a word is at the beginning
>> of a sentence or not ?
>
> If we don't, we should.
No, we don't do this, AFAIK.
The apple native spellchecker is different however.
There we
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Do we pass to the spell backend whether a word is at the beginning
> of a sentence or not ?
If we don't, we should.
Jürgen
On 13-5-2011 10:14, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>>> But this is the case now, isn't it? If all the words in "The cat sat
>>> on the mat" are recognized as correctly spelled, so will all the words
>>> in "The Cat sat on the Mat". Or am I missing som
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > But this is the case now, isn't it? If all the words in "The cat sat
> > on the mat" are recognized as correctly spelled, so will all the words
> > in "The Cat sat on the Mat". Or am I missing something?
>
> Yes, it is. For English at least. As
Stephan Witt wrote:
> My reading was to treat IMHO and LyX as correctly spelled because of the
> multiple uppercase letters... mind reading is a difficult task...
I see. Ignore acronyms. I don't see why a spellchecker should do that. I
certainly want LyX to inform me if I mistype AIDS as ADIS and
Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2011 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 13.05.2011 um 00:06 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org:
> > Author: kuemmel
> > Date: Fri May 13 00:06:06 2011
> > New Revision: 38733
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38733
> >
> > Log:
> > cmake on mac: also build with LYX_NLS=0
> >
> > Modifie
On 05/12/2011 05:05 PM, Joost Verburg wrote:
"Abdelrazak Younes" wrote in message
news:4dcb8b0d.6090...@lyx.org...
AFAIK Joost maintains such a dll. Joost could you please update the intl
directory with whatever fixes you have?
AFAIK2 the gettext developpers have dropped msvc support a long tim
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> But this is the case now, isn't it? If all the words in "The cat sat
> on the mat" are recognized as correctly spelled, so will all the words
> in "The Cat sat on the Mat". Or am I missing something?
Yes, it is. For English at least. As I said, this is a spell backend issue
Am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org:
> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt
> ===
> === --- lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt Thu May 12 23:48:11
> 2011(r38731) +++ lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> > Well, in English, there is Title Casing in some contexts.
>>
>> And not to forget that assuming proper nouns is not a panacea. There
>> is nothing valid in: "Barracck Obramsa goes to Neew Yorrk". Why would
>> a
On 05/13/2011 09:17 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Well, in English, there is Title Casing in some contexts.
And not to forget that assuming proper nouns is not a panacea. There
is nothing valid in: "Barracck Obramsa goes to Neew Yorrk". Why would
anyone want to see this ma
On 2011-05-13, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> My reading was to treat IMHO and LyX as correctly spelled because of the
>> multiple
>> uppercase letters...
>> mind reading is a difficult task...
> Don't we have an LFUN for this? I'm positive I saw
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> My reading was to treat IMHO and LyX as correctly spelled because of the
> multiple
> uppercase letters...
> mind reading is a difficult task...
>
Don't we have an LFUN for this? I'm positive I saw it somewhere.
Liviu
Am 13.05.2011 um 09:17 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>>> Well, in English, there is Title Casing in some contexts.
>>
>> And not to forget that assuming proper nouns is not a panacea. There
>> is nothing valid in: "Barracck Obramsa goes to Neew Yorrk". Why would
>> anyone wa
On 05/12/2011 11:36 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
Before I commit these---especially to branch---I thought I'd post them
for comment.
The 0002 patch shows the real point of this: We do not need to clone the
whole Buffer here, but only need access to a copy of the BufferParams.
The 0001 patch does wha
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > Well, in English, there is Title Casing in some contexts.
>
> And not to forget that assuming proper nouns is not a panacea. There
> is nothing valid in: "Barracck Obramsa goes to Neew Yorrk". Why would
> anyone want to see this marked as correctly spelled?
My reading of
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> and I'm almost sure this is
>> not desired in any language.
>
> Well, in English, there is Title Casing in some contexts.
>
And not to forget that assuming proper nouns is not a panacea. There
is nothing valid in: "Barracck Obramsa goes
38 matches
Mail list logo
