lyx-cvs emails -- possible to indicate when containing more than one commit?

I currently try to keep up-to-date on pushes to the repo by reading the lyx-cvs emails. However, I just realized that I might be missing some commits that I would be interested in because when someone pushes more than one commit at once, it is stacked in one email. The top one might be "typos" and

Re: Faithful LyX2XML conversion

I've pushed an update to lyx2xml in my clone of lyx that uses XML namespaces for layouts and insets, and which supports math (though it doesn't output MathML, sadly, not yet). So now the XML output looks more like this: some text Whatever and so on. This is much nicer than the earlier version'

Re: Bug report: 2.0.5 crashes on exit on mac mountain lion

Hallo Stephan, No, you're right. I ran "purge" just now a few times, and the behavior stopped. I also cleared the recent history. I'd table this for now -- it may well have been a fluke, or my mistake. Thanks! -- Boyan Penkov On Dec 28, 2012, at 5:01 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 28.12.2

Re: Bug report: 2.0.5 crashes on exit on mac mountain lion

Am 28.12.2012 um 14:45 schrieb Boyan Penkov : > Hello, > > I'm writing to report a bug: LyX 2.0.5 systematically crashes on exit. My OS > is OX Mountain Lion (10.8.2). The core dump is here: > --- > > Process: lyx [77955] > Path:/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx > I

Re: [PATCH] InsetTabular code cleanup

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 18.12.2012 23:29, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >> Uwe, sorry to bother you with something minor but I just want to know >> if I should forget about this or put it in. It's your call. > > > If you really think that the code renaming is useful t

Re: [DECISION] final layout patches for branch

Am 16.12.2012 18:27, schrieb Richard Heck: I understand your point. But as said, who really downgrades from a working LyX 2.0.6 to 2.0.5? I think this question has been answered. The worry isn't so much that people downgrade (though they do, if a new version introduces a bug that really bother

Re: Git Procedure for 2.0.5.1

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Op 27-12-2012 23:27, Nico Williams schreef: > On Dec 27, 2012 3:07 PM, "Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote: >>> You can correct almost everything with git. Just don't push a wrong tag, >>> ... > >> Right, because deleting a branch or tag

Re: [PATCH] InsetTabular code cleanup

Am 18.12.2012 23:29, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Uwe, sorry to bother you with something minor but I just want to know if I should forget about this or put it in. It's your call. If you really think that the code renaming is useful then put it in. Personally I wouldn't rename it because the mult

Re: LyX developer meeting or not ?

On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 22:04 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > And what are the constraints in terms of opening hours ? > >From ~7:30 to ~21:00. > >> I am not sure we need a good hotel. Some mattresses to sleep on may > be > >> enough. The event is very very informal: programming, discussing, >

Re: annotations for new layout argument feature

Am 28.12.2012 11:21, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: I have implemented now the possibility to place (inset-inserted) arguments after the main (workarea-inserted) argument for commands. Such arguments have the prefix "post:", i.e. Argument post:1 Thank you. I'll test it next year. best regards U

Bug report: 2.0.5 crashes on exit on mac mountain lion

Hello, I'm writing to report a bug: LyX 2.0.5 systematically crashes on exit. My OS is OX Mountain Lion (10.8.2). The core dump is here: --- Process: lyx [77955] Path:/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx Identifier: org.lyx.lyx Version: 2.0.5 (???) Code Typ

Re: Git Procedure for 2.0.5.1

Op 27-12-2012 23:27, Nico Williams schreef: On Dec 27, 2012 3:07 PM, "Vincent van Ravesteijn" > wrote: > You can correct almost everything with git. Just don't push a wrong tag, ... Right, because deleting a branch or tag, or making a branch name refer to a completely d

Re: annotations for new layout argument feature

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > But how can i force that argument 3 is output after the text the users > enters in LyX? > > I could alternatively setup 4 arguments but then the user has to input > everything via InsetArguments. This is OK in my opinion, but what do you > think? I have implemented now the pos

Re: Re: translations, category

Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012 um 09:45:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Richard Heck wrote: > > Sectioning sounds right to me. > > Kornel, can you do the change yourself? I will. > Jürgen Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [LyX master] Do not force latex_language in arguments (bug #8471)

Kornel Benko wrote: > > Should we ditch this ugly test and see what happens? > > I think yes, in trunk. At least we could get a testcase, if something breaks > IMHO. I commented it out for now. If we do not get any report, I'll remove it altogether eventually. Jürgen

Re: translations, category

Richard Heck wrote: > Sectioning sounds right to me. Kornel, can you do the change yourself? Jürgen