Reading will be easier, I think, for the reasons I've described before.
Also, you could use lyx2xml to write so you can test the read path, but I
don't know of an xml2lyx tool you could use for the reverse.
Just my 2c.
On Wednesday 08 May 2013 17:43:41 Richard Heck wrote:
> Thinking ahead, however: Should we use some SAX library to read the XML?
> Or should we just adapt the Lexer for this purpose?
>
> Richard
Lars had that working for a previous version of lyx with lexer. His branches
are still available in
I have started to think seriously about moving to XML for LyX's native
file format. I doubt that we will want to do this for 2.1, as it is too
late, really, so I am thinking about doing it for some time early in the
2.2 cycle, which means starting now.
My plan is first to write routines that
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Abhishek Sharma wrote:
> I'm using the Lyx document processor and studying the interface for Lyx.
> And for this I have studied the tutorial given in Lyx, is there any
> other source I can use to enhance my knowledge for interface of Lyx.
>
It's not a tutorial per
Dear all,
Here is a first go at reading directly .mo files (and thus getting rid
of the code in intl/). The code is even simpler than I thought it would
be. There remains several things to do, but I am rather pleased with the
result in general.
Note that currently, the two code paths are active,
Good day to you
I'm working on the project "Horizontal scrollbar for Lyx"
I'm using the Lyx document processor and studying the interface for Lyx.
And for this I have studied the tutorial given in Lyx, is there any
other source I can use to enhance my knowledge for interface of Lyx.
Thankyou
Abh
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 15:11 +0200, Christian Staudt wrote:
> as a regular user I just wanted to let you know that if the LyX
> project would accept donations via Flattr, I would have a
> subscription.
+1, except for the fact that the cheapest way to use Flattr is through
MoneyBookers/Skrill, whic
On 05/07/2013 04:05 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 07/05/13 22:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Richard, what about this for 2.0.x?
Yes, that's fine.
rh
