Alessandro Di Federico wrote:
For the oxygen set, I think they're already OK, except for the fact that
in the KDE oxygen package [1] I couldn't find an icon similar to the one
we have for the block alignment. Actually I couldn't find them at all,
where did we get them from? Should I manually
On May 12, 2013, at 17:51 , Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 12.05.2013 um 17:04 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr:
Hi,
I would be happy to participate (in July/August) to make the cmake building
process complete and more fool-proof on mac (a few months ago
Am 13.05.2013 um 09:08 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr:
On May 12, 2013, at 17:51 , Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 12.05.2013 um 17:04 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr:
Hi,
I would be happy to participate (in July/August) to make
On May 13, 2013, at 10:35 , Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 13.05.2013 um 09:08 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr:
On May 12, 2013, at 17:51 , Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 12.05.2013 um 17:04 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
When placeholders are used, the context can indicate what will be
substituted for the placeholder (e.g. %1$s[[date]], %1$s[[time]]).
---
Any objections to this patch ? I think it will be helpful for the translators.
Vincent
README.localization | 5 +++--
src/support/Messages.cpp | 27
Am 13.05.2013 um 11:20 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr:
On May 13, 2013, at 10:35 , Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 13.05.2013 um 09:08 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr:
On May 12, 2013, at 17:51 , Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
On 05/12/2013 12:44 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 09/05/2013 5:05 PM, Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
The bug with LyXHTML, which is different from that encountered with
elyxer.py, is the following.
See the attached files.
In the .xhtml file the reference in the text appears with a symbol after
On 05/13/2013 06:54 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
When placeholders are used, the context can indicate what will be
substituted for the placeholder (e.g. %1$s[[date]], %1$s[[time]]).
---
Any objections to this patch ? I think it will be helpful for the translators.
Fine with me, though
Richard Heck wrote:
On 05/13/2013 06:54 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
When placeholders are used, the context can indicate what will be
substituted for the placeholder (e.g. %1$s[[date]], %1$s[[time]]).
---
Any objections to this patch ? I think it will be helpful for the
Am Montag, 13. Mai 2013 um 15:25:22, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org
Richard Heck wrote:
On 05/13/2013 06:54 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
When placeholders are used, the context can indicate what will be
substituted for the placeholder (e.g. %1$s[[date]], %1$s[[time]]).
On 05/12/2013 11:46 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 12.05.2013 um 16:51 schrieb v...@lyx.org:
Author: Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 12:57:14 +0200
New Commit: 1fded6e8175e92c1eaa1e85db7c3f8187e47e602
URL:
Dear all,
In trunk we have two EPS formats:
\Format epseps EPS %%
vectorimage/x-eps
\Format eps2 epsEPS (uncropped)%%
vector
What is eps2 for? What is the difference between the two?
Thanks,
Liviu
--
Do you know how
13/05/2013 12:54, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
When placeholders are used, the context can indicate what will be
substituted for the placeholder (e.g. %1$s[[date]], %1$s[[time]]).
---
Any objections to this patch ? I think it will be helpful for the translators.
Yes, good idea.
JMarc
Now that LyX 2.1 is coming up, many tickets are being dealt with. For
these tickets, if they aren't likely to make it into 2.1, the
milestone is being dropped. Is this what's normally done? I was
expecting the milestone to be changed to 2.2.
Is it correct that the tickets with milestone 2.1 that
On 05/13/2013 10:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Now that LyX 2.1 is coming up, many tickets are being dealt with. For
these tickets, if they aren't likely to make it into 2.1, the
milestone is being dropped. Is this what's normally done? I was
expecting the milestone to be changed to 2.2.
Is it
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
I think that's the idea: that we re-think all the targeted bugs and decide
if they really should be targeted. I've reset milestones for a few already.
I think so, too. This basically means that if a devel works on the
feature
Dear community,
So I have been working with Rob on the non-linear writing project for a
week already, and I'm focusing on implementing the corkboard graphics Ui.
We planned to implement it using the graphic view framework, but I tried
QML and think it's really cool. I want to hear from the
On 05/13/2013 10:52 AM, Ashley Shan wrote:
Also, I'm still very confused about using drag and drop; could anyone
point to me some good resources to learn the graphic view framework's
drag and drop? Thanks in advance.
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/examples-draganddrop.html
Sorry, don't
Hi Richard,
Thank you very much for the link. I looked at these examples earlier today,
but I realized that they are for Qt Widgets, not for the Graphic View
Framework. The only resources I can find about using drag and drop in the
graphic view framework are:
On 05/13/2013 11:17 AM, Ashley Shan wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thank you very much for the link. I looked at these examples earlier
today, but I realized that they are for Qt Widgets, not for the
Graphic View Framework.
Sorry, I didn't even realize these were different. However, I also read:
On 13/05/2013 14:54, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 13.05.2013 um 11:20 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr:
When make install from CMake produces an useful result like the auto-tools make
install
we have a good starting point. Then one can change the mentioned shell script
or
On 13/05/2013 16:52, Ashley Shan wrote:
Dear community,
So I have been working with Rob on the non-linear writing project for
a week already, and I'm focusing on implementing the corkboard
graphics Ui. We planned to implement it using the graphic view
framework, but I tried QML and think
Richard Heck wrote:
This appears to be only for the features repo. I can copy the post-receive
hook from the main repo if people want diffs for this repo.
Please, that was what I was asking for. Pavel
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Is it correct that the tickets with milestone 2.1 that don't make it
into to 2.1 will not be treated like tickets with no milestone?
It depends, many enhacenment bugs are there for years and no one is going to
touch them.
Milestone has some meaning if there is reason to
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 05/13/2013 10:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Perhaps this is a good thing. This would force us to think about all
of the milestones of all unmarked tickets. There are probably some old
tickets that are being ignored that
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Is it correct that the tickets with milestone 2.1 that don't make it
into to 2.1 will not be treated like tickets with no milestone?
It depends, many enhacenment bugs are there for years and no one is
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I think it is worth investing time in it. At the meeting everybody agreed
that we should have one build system in the long run. But to make cmake
official we need to achieve the following:
1) implement the missing feature of autotools in cmake, especially for MAC
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I think the milestone should also be set if someone *should* be
working on it. There are some bugs that I report/modify that are not
I'm afraid that number of bugs that we consider *someone else* should
really do it is already 4*zillion ;)
P
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I think the milestone should also be set if someone *should* be
working on it. There are some bugs that I report/modify that are not
I'm afraid that number of bugs that we consider *someone else* should
On 05/13/2013 01:43 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
This appears to be only for the features repo. I can copy the post-receive
hook from the main repo if people want diffs for this repo.
Please, that was what I was asking for.
Should be working.
rh
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
But there should be some way to specify urgency. 'Priority' seems
determined by other variables so is not used for this.
I think 'Severity' serves this purpose. High severity usually pertains
to problematic bugs (not
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Dear all,
In trunk we have two EPS formats:
\Format epseps EPS %%
vectorimage/x-eps
\Format eps2 epsEPS (uncropped)%%
vector
What is eps2 for? What is the difference between the two?
See
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I think it is worth investing time in it. At the meeting everybody
agreed that we should have one build system in the long run. But to make
cmake official we need to achieve the following:
1) implement the missing feature of autotools in cmake, especially for
MAC as
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Georg Baum
georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Dear all,
In trunk we have two EPS formats:
\Format epseps EPS %%
vectorimage/x-eps
\Format eps2 epsEPS (uncropped)%%
Op 13 mei 2013 20:39 schreef Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org het
volgende:
Op 13 mei 2013 16:18 schreef Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org het
volgende:
Now that LyX 2.1 is coming up, many tickets are being dealt with. For
these tickets, if they aren't likely to make it into 2.1, the
Op 13 mei 2013 20:58 schreef Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de
het volgende:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I think it is worth investing time in it. At the meeting everybody
agreed that we should have one build system in the long run. But to make
cmake official we need to achieve the
Liviu Andronic wrote:
I think 'Severity' serves this purpose. High severity usually pertains
to problematic bugs (not enhancements); these include crashes, data
loss, etc.
Yes, I will add it to the FAQ if it's not there yet. P
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Anyways, I won't fight this anymore, except that however milestone is
used, I think it should be used the same by everyone. If there's
inconsistent treatment across time (e.g. *if* in transition from 2.0
to 2.1 all tickets with milestone 2.0 are changed to 2.1 but in 2.1
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Sunday, May 12, 2013, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I got them all.
ldm conspiracy :))
We really thought you received everything, because you agreed on
everything that we decided.
Seriously: It would be good to fix
Georg,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Georg Baum
georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
What is eps2 for? What is the difference between the two?
See the comment in configure.py just in front of the eps2-eps converter. If
this is not understandable please explain what is unclear, and I'll
On 05/13/2013 04:01 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Sunday, May 12, 2013, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I got them all.
ldm conspiracy :))
We really thought you received everything, because you agreed on
everything that we
Le 13/05/13 19:21, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
I think it is worth investing time in it. At the meeting everybody
agreed that we should have one build system in the long run. But to make
cmake official we need to achieve the following:
Translation: at the meeting we had a rather heated
Richard Heck wrote:
Seriously: It would be good to fix this ASAP. I just browsed though the
latest changes and saw that you asked me to look at bug 4812, but I did
not get any mail. Therefore I believe that there are comments I should be
notified of.
I'm not sure what would be causing this
On 05/13/2013 06:32 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Seriously: It would be good to fix this ASAP. I just browsed though the
latest changes and saw that you asked me to look at bug 4812, but I did
not get any mail. Therefore I believe that there are comments I should be
notified of.
Hi Richard,
I just checked out your latest changes and get these errors when compiling
(CMake, Qt 4.8.4):
D:\LyXGit\Master\src\output_xhtml.h(167): warning C4099: 'lyx::html::FontTag' : type name first seen
using 'class' now seen using 'struct'
Hi Richard,
I saw the same sentence but I didn't think much about it until you pointed
it out. I think QWidget examples should help me to use drag and drop in the
graphic view framework. Thanks!
Ashley
*Xueqing Shan*
Vanderbilt University, '16
On Mon, May
Am 14.05.2013 um 01:25 schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org:
On 05/13/2013 06:32 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Seriously: It would be good to fix this ASAP. I just browsed though the
latest changes and saw that you asked me to look at bug 4812, but I did
not get any mail.
Dear all,
I've just updated a patch that simply adds two new converters to LyX:
pdflatex - pdfcrop and DVI - EPS. They're also accompanied by two
templates, which only set 'empty' page style and predefine the default
output format.
This basically allow us to have an equation editor-like mode in
Alessandro Di Federico wrote:
> For the oxygen set, I think they're already OK, except for the fact that
> in the KDE oxygen package [1] I couldn't find an icon similar to the one
> we have for the "block" alignment. Actually I couldn't find them at all,
> where did we get them from? Should I
On May 12, 2013, at 17:51 , Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 12.05.2013 um 17:04 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
> :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would be happy to participate (in July/August) to make the cmake building
>> process complete and more fool-proof on mac (a
Am 13.05.2013 um 09:08 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
:
> On May 12, 2013, at 17:51 , Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 12.05.2013 um 17:04 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
>> :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would be happy to participate
On May 13, 2013, at 10:35 , Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 13.05.2013 um 09:08 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
> :
>
>> On May 12, 2013, at 17:51 , Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>>> Am 12.05.2013 um 17:04 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
>>>
When placeholders are used, the context can indicate what will be
substituted for the placeholder (e.g. "%1$s[[date]], %1$s[[time]]).
---
Any objections to this patch ? I think it will be helpful for the translators.
Vincent
README.localization | 5 +++--
src/support/Messages.cpp | 27
Am 13.05.2013 um 11:20 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
:
> On May 13, 2013, at 10:35 , Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 13.05.2013 um 09:08 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
>> :
>>
>>> On May 12, 2013, at 17:51 , Stephan Witt
On 05/12/2013 12:44 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 09/05/2013 5:05 PM, Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
The bug with LyXHTML, which is different from that encountered with
elyxer.py, is the following.
See the attached files.
In the .xhtml file the reference in the text appears with a symbol after
On 05/13/2013 06:54 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
When placeholders are used, the context can indicate what will be
substituted for the placeholder (e.g. "%1$s[[date]], %1$s[[time]]).
---
Any objections to this patch ? I think it will be helpful for the translators.
Fine with me, though
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 06:54 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > When placeholders are used, the context can indicate what will be
> > substituted for the placeholder (e.g. "%1$s[[date]], %1$s[[time]]).
> > ---
> >
> > Any objections to this patch ? I think it will be helpful for
Am Montag, 13. Mai 2013 um 15:25:22, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > On 05/13/2013 06:54 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > > When placeholders are used, the context can indicate what will be
> > > substituted for the placeholder (e.g. "%1$s[[date]],
On 05/12/2013 11:46 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 12.05.2013 um 16:51 schrieb v...@lyx.org:
Author: Uwe Stöhr
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 12:57:14 +0200
New Commit: 1fded6e8175e92c1eaa1e85db7c3f8187e47e602
URL:
Dear all,
In trunk we have two EPS formats:
\Format epseps EPS"" "%%"""
"vector""image/x-eps"
\Format eps2 eps"EPS (uncropped)" "" "%%" ""
"vector"""
What is eps2 for? What is the difference between the two?
Thanks,
Liviu
13/05/2013 12:54, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
When placeholders are used, the context can indicate what will be
substituted for the placeholder (e.g. "%1$s[[date]], %1$s[[time]]).
---
Any objections to this patch ? I think it will be helpful for the translators.
Yes, good idea.
JMarc
Now that LyX 2.1 is coming up, many tickets are being dealt with. For
these tickets, if they aren't likely to make it into 2.1, the
milestone is being dropped. Is this what's normally done? I was
expecting the milestone to be changed to 2.2.
Is it correct that the tickets with milestone 2.1 that
On 05/13/2013 10:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Now that LyX 2.1 is coming up, many tickets are being dealt with. For
these tickets, if they aren't likely to make it into 2.1, the
milestone is being dropped. Is this what's normally done? I was
expecting the milestone to be changed to 2.2.
Is it
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> I think that's the idea: that we re-think all the targeted bugs and decide
> if they really should be targeted. I've reset milestones for a few already.
>
I think so, too. This basically means that if a devel works on the
Dear community,
So I have been working with Rob on the non-linear writing project for a
week already, and I'm focusing on implementing the corkboard graphics Ui.
We planned to implement it using the graphic view framework, but I tried
QML and think it's really cool. I want to hear from the
On 05/13/2013 10:52 AM, Ashley Shan wrote:
Also, I'm still very confused about using drag and drop; could anyone
point to me some good resources to learn the graphic view framework's
drag and drop? Thanks in advance.
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/examples-draganddrop.html
Sorry, don't
Hi Richard,
Thank you very much for the link. I looked at these examples earlier today,
but I realized that they are for Qt Widgets, not for the Graphic View
Framework. The only resources I can find about using drag and drop in the
graphic view framework are:
On 05/13/2013 11:17 AM, Ashley Shan wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thank you very much for the link. I looked at these examples earlier
today, but I realized that they are for Qt Widgets, not for the
Graphic View Framework.
Sorry, I didn't even realize these were different. However, I also read:
On 13/05/2013 14:54, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 13.05.2013 um 11:20 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski
:
When make install from CMake produces an useful result like the auto-tools make
install
we have a good starting point. Then one can change the mentioned shell script
or
On 13/05/2013 16:52, Ashley Shan wrote:
Dear community,
So I have been working with Rob on the non-linear writing project for
a week already, and I'm focusing on implementing the corkboard
graphics Ui. We planned to implement it using the graphic view
framework, but I tried QML and think
Richard Heck wrote:
> This appears to be only for the features repo. I can copy the post-receive
> hook from the main repo if people want diffs for this repo.
Please, that was what I was asking for. Pavel
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Is it correct that the tickets with milestone 2.1 that don't make it
> into to 2.1 will not be treated like tickets with no milestone?
It depends, many enhacenment bugs are there for years and no one is going to
touch them.
Milestone has some meaning if there is reason
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 10:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> Perhaps this is a good thing. This would force us to think about all
>> of the milestones of all unmarked tickets. There are probably some old
>> tickets that are being
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> Is it correct that the tickets with milestone 2.1 that don't make it
>> into to 2.1 will not be treated like tickets with no milestone?
>
> It depends, many enhacenment bugs are there for years and no
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I think it is worth investing time in it. At the meeting everybody agreed
> that we should have one build system in the long run. But to make cmake
> official we need to achieve the following:
> 1) implement the missing feature of autotools in cmake, especially for MAC
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I think the milestone should also be set if someone *should* be
> working on it. There are some bugs that I report/modify that are not
I'm afraid that number of bugs that we consider *someone else* should
really do it is already 4*zillion ;)
P
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> I think the milestone should also be set if someone *should* be
>> working on it. There are some bugs that I report/modify that are not
>
> I'm afraid that number of bugs that we consider *someone else*
On 05/13/2013 01:43 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
This appears to be only for the features repo. I can copy the post-receive
hook from the main repo if people want diffs for this repo.
Please, that was what I was asking for.
Should be working.
rh
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> But there should be some way to specify urgency. 'Priority' seems
> determined by other variables so is not used for this.
>
I think 'Severity' serves this purpose. High severity usually pertains
to problematic bugs (not
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Dear all,
> In trunk we have two EPS formats:
> \Format epseps EPS"" "%%"""
> "vector""image/x-eps"
> \Format eps2 eps"EPS (uncropped)" "" "%%" ""
> "vector"""
>
> What is eps2 for? What is the
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I think it is worth investing time in it. At the meeting everybody
> agreed that we should have one build system in the long run. But to make
> cmake official we need to achieve the following:
> 1) implement the missing feature of autotools in cmake, especially for
>
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> In trunk we have two EPS formats:
>> \Format epseps EPS"" "%%"""
>> "vector""image/x-eps"
>> \Format eps2 eps"EPS
Op 13 mei 2013 20:39 schreef "Vincent van Ravesteijn" het
volgende:
>
> Op 13 mei 2013 16:18 schreef "Scott Kostyshak" het
> volgende:
> >
> > Now that LyX 2.1 is coming up, many tickets are being dealt with. For
> > these tickets, if they aren't likely to make
Op 13 mei 2013 20:58 schreef "Georg Baum"
het volgende:
>
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > I think it is worth investing time in it. At the meeting everybody
> > agreed that we should have one build system in the long run. But to make
> > cmake official we need to
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> I think 'Severity' serves this purpose. High severity usually pertains
> to problematic bugs (not enhancements); these include crashes, data
> loss, etc.
Yes, I will add it to the FAQ if it's not there yet. P
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Anyways, I won't fight this anymore, except that however milestone is
> used, I think it should be used the same by everyone. If there's
> inconsistent treatment across time (e.g. *if* in transition from 2.0
> to 2.1 all tickets with milestone 2.0 are changed to 2.1 but in
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> On Sunday, May 12, 2013, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>> I got them all.
>>
>> ldm conspiracy :))
>>
>
> We really thought you received everything, because you agreed on
> everything that we decided.
Seriously: It
Georg,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
>> What is eps2 for? What is the difference between the two?
>
> See the comment in configure.py just in front of the eps2->eps converter. If
> this is not understandable please explain what is unclear,
On 05/13/2013 04:01 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Sunday, May 12, 2013, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I got them all.
ldm conspiracy :))
We really thought you received everything, because you agreed on
everything that we
Le 13/05/13 19:21, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
I think it is worth investing time in it. At the meeting everybody
agreed that we should have one build system in the long run. But to make
cmake official we need to achieve the following:
Translation: at the meeting we had a rather heated
Richard Heck wrote:
>> Seriously: It would be good to fix this ASAP. I just browsed though the
>> latest changes and saw that you asked me to look at bug 4812, but I did
>> not get any mail. Therefore I believe that there are comments I should be
>> notified of.
>
> I'm not sure what would be
On 05/13/2013 06:32 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Seriously: It would be good to fix this ASAP. I just browsed though the
latest changes and saw that you asked me to look at bug 4812, but I did
not get any mail. Therefore I believe that there are comments I should be
notified of.
Hi Richard,
I just checked out your latest changes and get these errors when compiling
(CMake, Qt 4.8.4):
D:\LyXGit\Master\src\output_xhtml.h(167): warning C4099: 'lyx::html::FontTag' : type name first seen
using 'class' now seen using 'struct'
Hi Richard,
I saw the same sentence but I didn't think much about it until you pointed
it out. I think QWidget examples should help me to use drag and drop in the
graphic view framework. Thanks!
Ashley
*Xueqing Shan*
Vanderbilt University, '16
On Mon, May
Am 14.05.2013 um 01:25 schrieb Richard Heck :
> On 05/13/2013 06:32 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Richard Heck wrote:
Seriously: It would be good to fix this ASAP. I just browsed though the
latest changes and saw that you asked me to look at bug 4812, but I did
not get
Dear all,
I've just updated a patch that simply adds two new converters to LyX:
pdflatex -> pdfcrop and DVI -> EPS. They're also accompanied by two
templates, which only set 'empty' page style and predefine the default
output format.
This basically allow us to have an "equation editor"-like
96 matches
Mail list logo