Re: #8703: 'new shortcut' box closes if no shortcut

2013-10-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Martin Hoffmann wrote: > On 06.10.2013 10:25, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> Welcome to the list! >> >> Yes, welcome on board, Martin! >> >>> I tested your patch and it works well for me. Does anyone else know >>> whether this is a correct f

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Georg Baum
Richard Heck wrote: > The things that are turning up in the corrupt file look to me like UI > strings. So I'm guessing that what happens is that, while the file is > being exported, we are calling the iconv stuff to deal with UI strings, > and we end up with a mess. Perhaps this is more likely to

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:18:38PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > When I open the document in a plain text editor, it complains about > characters that cannot be represented in the current codeset (or > something like that). Maybe your editor is not configured for reading utf8 encoded tex

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Georg Baum
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:39:57AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> > The problem here is that to_utf8() (and most probably all other >> > conversion routines) is not thread safe, maybe due to the static >> > output buffer in iconv_convert(). >

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Georg Baum
Richard Heck wrote: > Great work, Enrico. I've posted the patch to the bug report. We'll see > what the reporter has to say. Great work indeed! > It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, and, > indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along. This is not stran

Re: Remarques sur l'intro à LyX

2013-10-07 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.09.2013 17:04, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Am Sonntag 15 September 2013, 16:43:49 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien: Typos corrected in the attached patches both for branch and master versions of Intro.lyx. I also corrected the link to www.lyx.org/Translation to point towards the French vers

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Richard Heck
On 10/07/2013 04:16 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 7-10-2013 21:18, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: Op 7-10-2013 21:05, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, and, indeed, t

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Op 7-10-2013 21:18, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: > Something else I notice: Sometime the macros are exported as "\newcommand" > and sometimes as "\renewcommand". This seems to be rather random. > I saw this too. For me the differe

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 7-10-2013 21:18, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: Op 7-10-2013 21:05, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along. Act

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 7-10-2013 21:05, Enrico Forestieri schreef: So, the bug also depends on the structure of the document, somehow. Is the registered trademark symbol on line 460 and 480 of the lyx file the problem maybe ? Vincent

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 7-10-2013 21:05, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along. Actually, all my files are converted correctly. But usin

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, > and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along. Actually, all my files are converted correctly. But using the one attached to the bug report trigge

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:39:57AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > The problem here is that to_utf8() (and most probably all other > > conversion routines) is not thread safe, maybe due to the static > > output buffer in iconv_convert(). > > Huh, iconv strikes back. We al

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > The problem here is that to_utf8() (and most probably all other > conversion routines) is not thread safe, maybe due to the static > output buffer in iconv_convert(). Huh, iconv strikes back. We already knew that iconv is not thread safe and I remember we already mutexed

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Richard Heck
On 10/07/2013 02:10 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:09:50PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: I just wanted to call everyone's attention to this bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8854 It appears to be a very nasty dataloss bug in 2.1-beta1. What seems to be happening is that,

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:10:33PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > The problem here is that to_utf8() (and most probably all other > conversion routines) is not thread safe, maybe due to the static > output buffer in iconv_convert(). Yes, this seems to be the case. The attached alternative pa

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:09:50PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > I just wanted to call everyone's attention to this bug: > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8854 > It appears to be a very nasty dataloss bug in 2.1-beta1. What seems > to be happening is that, on save, the LyX file is corrupted in ver

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 6-10-2013 18:09, Richard Heck schreef: I just wanted to call everyone's attention to this bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8854 It appears to be a very nasty dataloss bug in 2.1-beta1. What seems to be happening is that, on save, the LyX file is corrupted in very weird ways, with random

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
I tried to export user guide under valgrind, but got no interesting warnibg. JMarc Richard Heck a écrit : >On 10/06/2013 01:38 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 06/10/2013 18:09, Richard Heck a écrit : >>> >>> I just wanted to call everyone's attention to this bug: >>> http://www.lyx.org/tr

Re: [LyX/master] Clarify instructions on how to set up the thesaurus (#8811)

2013-10-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I'm unsure also. It would be nice though to have a policy though. > Perhaps we could put it in ./lib/doc/Development.lyx. Yep. It would be even nicer if we could have ct markup from git revisions. If we track manually, we eventually will have to merge (pretty soon now, I

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-07 Thread Richard Heck
On 10/06/2013 01:38 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 06/10/2013 18:09, Richard Heck a écrit : I just wanted to call everyone's attention to this bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8854 It appears to be a very nasty dataloss bug in 2.1-beta1. What seems to be happening is that, on save, the L

Re: [LyX/master] Clarify instructions on how to set up the thesaurus (#8811)

2013-10-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> I thought that for documentation we use change-tracking so that we can >> see which parts need to be translated. Is the point that nothing needs >> to be translated here? Or that it's too late to send to transla

Re: [LyX/master] Clarify instructions on how to set up the thesaurus (#8811)

2013-10-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I thought that for documentation we use change-tracking so that we can > see which parts need to be translated. Is the point that nothing needs > to be translated here? Or that it's too late to send to translators > for 2.1 ? I didn't use it because there was no change tra

Re: [LyX/master] Clarify instructions on how to set up the thesaurus (#8811)

2013-10-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > commit c5c9e26feeccbb90e2b2f24d931e02820d6b9cad > Author: Juergen Spitzmueller > Date: Mon Oct 7 15:26:45 2013 +0200 > > Clarify instructions on how to set up the thesaurus (#8811) > I thought that for documentation we use chang