Re: Issues to discuss for 2.2.0rc1

2016-04-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Headers of .po files usually contains the last translator, > > This is what Kornel's script takes care of automatically. I just send bunch of direct emails for the translators. Lets see. P

Re: possible tag and tar of 2.2.0rc1 on Tuesday

2016-04-01 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 01/04/2016 04:43, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : 1. At #10019 Guillaume fixed some ui regressions. The patch seems short and logical and Stephan has tested it with success on Mac. I would still like to see if someone can test it on Windows before it is included. If anyone with Qt knowledge can

Re: Replacement of "long table" by "multi-pages table" in the manuals

2016-04-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:20:56PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > I was not aware of any changelogs translators use, I believe that CT was > used to signalize new things in manuals. Yes but after we send the manuals out and are waiting for them to be translated we don't want to change them in our

Re: Replacement of "long table" by "multi-pages table" in the manuals

2016-04-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >>I was asking about the other manuals, actually. > > > > > >They are at lib/doc/attic/Changelog-* > > > > I see. Why is that in attic? It does not make any sense to me, attic/ if for > > obsolete stuff IMO. > > This location was not intuitive to me either. Perhaps it

Re: Issues to discuss for 2.2.0rc1

2016-04-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:00:20PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > > Where can I get a > > current list of the email addresses of the translators? > > Headers of .po files usually contains the last translator, This is what Kornel's script takes care of automatically. Scott >

Re: Issues to discuss for 2.2.0rc1

2016-04-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
Georg Baum wrote: > Where can I get a > current list of the email addresses of the translators? Headers of .po files usually contains the last translator, git log should help in case the mail is missing. I would CC lyx doc list as well. Pavel

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

2016-04-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/01/2016 01:29 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 01/04/2016 18:15, Richard Heck a écrit : >> I do not know how to do the LaTeX part, but I am assuming someone else >> will. Once we have that, the idea would be to have a layout tag like: >> >> IfVersion whatever.cls >= 0.9 >>

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

2016-04-01 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-03-25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear all, > This email is my attempt to respond to what I think is a great idea [1] from > Uwe: > "So why can't there be a step by step rule in our development.lyx that > everybody can understand? That would be the decision." I tried to start a chapter

Re: possible tag and tar of 2.2.0rc1 on Tuesday

2016-04-01 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > 2. There is a mysterious crash with the MSVC2015 > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10009 which does not happen with a merged > build. Since we do not understand why a merged build "fixes" the crash we > do not know what other problems might be created by the same cause.

Re: layouts and file format changes (was: possible tag and tar of 2.2.0rc1 on Tuesday)

2016-04-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 08:39:14AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear all, > > > On 2016-04-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Günter has proposed layout patches to respond to changes in updated > > LaTeX class files at the following two threads: > > (acmsiggraph) > >

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:08:59PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 03/31/2016 03:45 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > > Guenter Milde wrote: > > > >> For a safe "last minute commit", it would be good if somone could check > >> the code itself, and the notes in the updated template and example file > >> and

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-01 Thread Georg Baum
Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-03-31, Georg Baum wrote: >> Guenter Milde wrote: > >>> For a safe "last minute commit", it would be good if somone could check >>> the code itself, and the notes in the updated template and example file >>> and then give an explicit +1 or not. > >> I did not test

Re: possible tag and tar of 2.2.0rc1 on Tuesday

2016-04-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:02:39PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > > > Den 01. april 2016 04:43, skrev Scott Kostyshak: > > > >The disadvantages of using Qt 5.6.0 instead of 5.5.1 are the following: > > > >1. Although Uwe tested and it works for him, no one else has tested. We would > >thus lose

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

2016-04-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 01/04/2016 18:15, Richard Heck a écrit : I do not know how to do the LaTeX part, but I am assuming someone else will. Once we have that, the idea would be to have a layout tag like: IfVersion whatever.cls >= 0.9 EndIfVersion Version testing is done via date in latex. So

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

2016-04-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/31/2016 05:35 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:53:15PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > >>> How about a "LyX layout repository" with supported¹ layouts at an >>> "official" URL (something like www.lyx.org/ressources/layouts/ or >>> similar, maybe with subdirs for major LyX

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/31/2016 03:45 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: > >> For a safe "last minute commit", it would be good if somone could check >> the code itself, and the notes in the updated template and example file >> and then give an explicit +1 or not. > I did not test anything, but I looked

Re: patch for acmsiggraph

2016-04-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/31/2016 02:27 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: > >> Thinking about it while writing aastex6.layout, there is a major >> disadvantage of the "old loads new" approach: >> >> * aastex6.layout inputs aastex.layout and currently only changes the name >> and referenced LaTeX class

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

2016-04-01 Thread Helge Hafting
Den 28. mars 2016 12:50, skrev Georg Baum: It all boils down to the question: Is the addition of a new .layout file a file format change or not? It does not make sense to treat new layouts differently in stable and master, so either it is a file format change in master (and can't be put

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

2016-04-01 Thread meik michalke
Am Freitag, 1. April 2016, 10:49:42 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Le 31/03/2016 23:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:53:15PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > >>> How about a "LyX layout repository" with supported¹ layouts at an > >>> "official" URL (something like

Re: possible tag and tar of 2.2.0rc1 on Tuesday

2016-04-01 Thread Helge Hafting
Den 01. april 2016 04:43, skrev Scott Kostyshak: The disadvantages of using Qt 5.6.0 instead of 5.5.1 are the following: 1. Although Uwe tested and it works for him, no one else has tested. We would thus lose all Windows-specific testing effort of the beta testers. I have also used

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

2016-04-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 31/03/2016 23:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:53:15PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: How about a "LyX layout repository" with supported¹ layouts at an "official" URL (something like www.lyx.org/ressources/layouts/ or similar, maybe with subdirs for major LyX versions,

layouts and file format changes (was: possible tag and tar of 2.2.0rc1 on Tuesday)

2016-04-01 Thread Guenter Milde
Dear all, On 2016-04-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Günter has proposed layout patches to respond to changes in updated > LaTeX class files at the following two threads: > (acmsiggraph) > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid=ndgr7a%24kuf%241%40ger.gmane.org > (aastex6) >

Re: Replacement of "long table" by "multi-pages table" in the manuals

2016-04-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 31/03/2016 21:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Shall I update docs and layouts or will you do it before release? Yes please do it. The reason why I think it is preferable for you to do it is in the Development manual: "Update LyX's .lyx documentation files to the new format. The developer