On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 08:22:40AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On 2 August 2017 at 10:03, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > I'm using gmail's web interface these days. This might be why I'm finding
> > > it difficult to efficiently follow threads that are so
Hi,
Q1: Can postscript (PS) code be embedded in a LyX document in such a way
such that it's parsed when doing a preview, or exporting a document?
Q2: Can PS code only be included by embedding a graphics inset referencing
e.g. a .ps-file?
Q3: Would the PS code, in e.g. an external file, be
On 2 August 2017 at 09:30, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following Christian's suggestion, I've added a section about the subject
>
> http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/SafetyAndSecurity#toc2
>
> Is it useful/appropriate?
>
Thanks for adding it. I read it and it
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Per stats on https://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk it might be proper time to drop
> support for languages having less than %50 translation status.
>
> Those would be the winners: Russian, Danish, Greek, Serbian,
> Galician, Catalan, Romanian, Dutch.
I did it. P
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On 2 August 2017 at 11:29, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > Ah I did not realize you did that on purpose. I actually found it
> > annoying when
> > > I wanted to go up the discussion and couldn't because it was cut off
> >
> > +1
On 2 August 2017 at 09:38, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 02/08/2017 à 09:30, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Following Christian's suggestion, I've added a section about the subject
>>
>> http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/SafetyAndSecurity#toc2
>>
>
>
As per the HTML, if this is the standard for LyX then let's go for it.
As per the rephrase, I'm ok with removing the "unless you know...", feel free
to commit.
Thanks,
T.
On 31/07/2017 23:10, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On 27 July 2017 at 00:06, Tommaso Cucinotta
On 02/08/2017 01:00, Christian Ridderström wrote:
The long threads likely by now do contain a lot of separate pieces of
description, but it's unfortunately not so easy (at least for me) to find this
information among all the posts. [...] Or perhaps to copy them to into one
place, adding minor
On 02/08/2017 17:45, Richard Heck wrote:
do even better. [...] People who have the expertise to design a new solution,
and then to implement it, whether via AppArmor or whatever, should feel free to
make it a priority for 2.4 and create a feature branch for it.
+1, I'll take some time to
On 2 August 2017 at 10:03, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm using gmail's web interface these days. This might be why I'm finding
> > it difficult to efficiently follow threads that are so long.
> > - The gmail labs thing I used for replying to parts of an e-mail is no
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo