https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/support/job/Check-author-email-in-commit-log/48/Changes:
[spitz] Fix child document regex in scanLogFile
[spitz] tex2lyx: normalize bib and bst paths
[milde] lyx2lyx fixes and cleanup.
[forenr] Avoid an infinite loop
[sanda] Cosmetics per JMarc's suggestions.
[spit
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:58:54PM +, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> I would include the link to the mirror listing. Otherwise, I can imagine
> frustration of having a slow/failed download causing me to then go hunt for
> a better alternative on the website (for a new user, who may not be totally
> fam
On 02/15/2018 05:52 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> commit b88ed81e7f1d2f59bb606351d95e093380b4eead
>> Author: Pavel Sanda
>> Date: Thu Feb 8 21:33:37 2018 +0100
>>
>> Unify graphics-groups inside marked block functionality.
>>
>> Fixes #11026.
> Richard, can this go
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 15 février 2018 16:32:23 GMT+01:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> > a écrit :
> >
> > >>I can try to prepare that. What character you want me to paste there?
> > >>I can't take 'f' from esint, there is no 'f' included. Pavel
> > >
> > >The integra
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 15 février 2018 16:32:23 GMT+01:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> a écrit :
>
> >>I can try to prepare that. What character you want me to paste there?
> >>I can't take 'f' from esint, there is no 'f' included. Pavel
> >
> >The integral at position 1.
>
> And glyph num
Le 15 février 2018 16:32:23 GMT+01:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
a écrit :
>>I can try to prepare that. What character you want me to paste there?
>>I can't take 'f' from esint, there is no 'f' included. Pavel
>
>The integral at position 1.
And glyph number 4, I think.
JMarc
Le 15 février 2018 16:23:16 GMT+01:00, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 15/02/2018 ?? 16:13, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>>> So what about copy-paste esint(f) into DejaVuSerif-Italic via
>fontforge
>>> and check what happens.
>>> If there is some metainfo set wrong we could use D
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 15/02/2018 ?? 16:13, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> So what about copy-paste esint(f) into DejaVuSerif-Italic via fontforge
>> and check what happens.
>> If there is some metainfo set wrong we could use Dejavu as a skeleton
>> and copy our symbols there...
>
> I never use
Le 15/02/2018 à 16:13, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
So what about copy-paste esint(f) into DejaVuSerif-Italic via fontforge
and check what happens.
If there is some metainfo set wrong we could use Dejavu as a skeleton
and copy our symbols there...
I never used fontforge to modify a font...
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 14/02/2018 ?? 17:11, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> I took a look at the Qt4 and Qt5 code and did not see a difference. It
>>> might be that our fonts are malformed.
>> I loaded esint10.ttf into fontforge and when I go to Metrics->set
>> L
Le 14/02/2018 à 17:11, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I took a look at the Qt4 and Qt5 code and did not see a difference. It
might be that our fonts are malformed.
I loaded esint10.ttf into fontforge and when I go to Metrics->set L/RBearings
of integral sign (#1) I see the v
Le 14/02/2018 à 16:50, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I have tried to run ttfdump on the ttf files, and it shows properly
negative right bearings for both fonts. At this point, I give up :)
Maybe we can try bipartisan attempt on Qt bug tracking system.
I recently filled up t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> can we merge the painting branch into 2.3.1 staging? I'm inclusively
>>> working on master without larger issues for quite some time now. That does
>>> not say anything about mac/win arch, but the sooner we start testing the
>>> better.
>> I'd be happy to have it in
Le 14/02/2018 à 18:54, Richard Heck a écrit :
can we merge the painting branch into 2.3.1 staging?
I'm inclusively working on master without larger issues for quite some time
now. That does not say anything about mac/win arch, but the sooner we start
testing the better.
I'd be happy to have it
Le 15/02/2018 à 11:29, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Pavel is supposed to push his original work on 2.3.1. I am waiting to
see whether this happens.
Everything is in place now.
JMarc
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> commit b88ed81e7f1d2f59bb606351d95e093380b4eead
> Author: Pavel Sanda
> Date: Thu Feb 8 21:33:37 2018 +0100
>
> Unify graphics-groups inside marked block functionality.
>
> Fixes #11026.
Richard, can this go to 2.3.2? P
>
> https://www.mail-archive.c
Le 14/02/2018 à 16:13, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 02/12/2018 08:39 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 12/02/2018 à 14:38, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
commit 1dba36c7cec6aeec2576e7a99e2967e867076a01
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Wed Feb 7 15:35:46 2018 +0100
Implement buffer-ano
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > If we don't need to do anything
> > super-fast, then I'll just merge 2.3.2-staging into 2.3.1-staging.
>
> I see, sounds good. Pavel
When I think more about it though, if *getting the branch tested* from other
devs is important goal of yours, then the
I??aki Larra??aga Murgoitio wrote:
> > (*):
> > "Property"
> > "Solution"
> > "Listing"
> > "Listings"
> > "List of Listings"
> > "see equation[[nomencl]]"
> > "page[[nomencl]]"
> >
>
>
> Are those new messages into PO file? Anyway, let me translate them to basque
> for you: (english : basque)
Richard Heck wrote:
> If we don't need to do anything
> super-fast, then I'll just merge 2.3.2-staging into 2.3.1-staging.
I see, sounds good. Pavel
20 matches
Mail list logo
