Re: [Windows] Remove the default binding between buffer-zoom and Alt+0

On 1/15/21 10:59 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 7:46 PM Scott Kostyshak > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 08:27:23PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > On 1/15/21 3:57 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > > >> However, by default, in LyX, this h

Re: [Windows] Remove the default binding between buffer-zoom and Alt+0

On 1/15/21 10:36 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 16/01/2021 3:46 pm, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 08:27:23PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >>> On 1/15/21 3:57 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > However, by default, in LyX, this has a very problematic side-effect: > Alt+0 >>

Re: [Windows] Remove the default binding between buffer-zoom and Alt+0

On 1/15/21 10:36 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 16/01/2021 3:46 pm, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 08:27:23PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >>> On 1/15/21 3:57 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > However, by default, in LyX, this has a very problematic side-effect: > Alt+0 >>

Re: [LyX features/InsetParams-refactoring] Refactor decodeInsetParam

On 1/15/21 2:10 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > The branch, InsetParams-refactoring, has been updated. > discards f7c88f53c728d138a7a4292cb94c7ea9d8b560d4 (commit) > discards 84563911f714f30b8b794bc2fd938f4f73be6f61 (commit) > discards 8ea179303d9e1a0dfb40a28b51154c8c2d766a8d (commit) > discar

Re: [Windows] Remove the default binding between buffer-zoom and Alt+0

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 7:46 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 08:27:23PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > On 1/15/21 3:57 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > > >> However, by default, in LyX, this has a very problematic side-effect: > > >> Alt+0 > > >> resets the zoom level to zer

Re: [Windows] Remove the default binding between buffer-zoom and Alt+0

On 16/01/2021 3:46 pm, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 08:27:23PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 1/15/21 3:57 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: However, by default, in LyX, this has a very problematic side-effect: Alt+0 resets the zoom level to zero. Personally, I know how to confi

Re: [Windows] Remove the default binding between buffer-zoom and Alt+0

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 08:27:23PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 1/15/21 3:57 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > >> However, by default, in LyX, this has a very problematic side-effect: > >> Alt+0 > >> resets the zoom level to zero. Personally, I know how to configure this > >> shortcut, but newc

Re: [Windows] Remove the default binding between buffer-zoom and Alt+0

On 1/15/21 3:57 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: >> However, by default, in LyX, this has a very problematic side-effect: >> Alt+0 >> resets the zoom level to zero. Personally, I know how to configure this >> shortcut, but newcomers may be left puzzled (and leave completely). >> >> Moreover, it's more commo

Re: Update docs on the wiki

On 1/15/21 2:01 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 06:34:08PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: >> The files were at ftp.lyx.de, I uploaded my files on the wiki, in directory >> LyX/Manuals/2.3 > Good, ftp.lyx.de was Uwe's private affair I believe. > >> There is nothing about Japanes

[Windows] Remove the default binding between buffer-zoom and Alt+0

However, by default, in LyX, this has a very problematic side-effect: Alt+0 resets the zoom level to zero. Personally, I know how to configure this shortcut, but newcomers may be left puzzled (and leave completely). Moreover, it's more common to use Ctrl+0 to reset the zoom level, at least on Win

Re: Creating a branch in the features repository

But there were some messages about big file. Is it normal? The email is too big. Probably because you are pushing a billion commits. Definitely, there were several thousand commits. So that was just email for mailing list. Thanks for the explanation. I think it is worth to sync master bra

Re: Update docs on the wiki

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 06:34:08PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > The files were at ftp.lyx.de, I uploaded my files on the wiki, in directory > LyX/Manuals/2.3 Good, ftp.lyx.de was Uwe's private affair I believe. > There is nothing about Japanese, and I'm unable to compile the Japanese > do

Re: Update docs on the wiki

Le 14/01/2021 à 14:00, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : Hello, I'm about to update the docs on the wiki. Could someone give me privately the identity and password to connect to ftp://wiki.lyx.org ? The files were at ftp.lyx.de, I uploaded my files on the wiki, in directory LyX/Manuals/2.3

Re: Creating a branch in the features repository

On 1/15/21 4:56 AM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > > Recently I've created a new branch in the features repository as > described here: > https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGit#toc3 > > But there were some messages about big file. Is it normal? > > Here is the Git output: > >

Re: Change LyX release numbering to Semantic Versioning

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:11:03AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I propose something where prime numbers are used for development releases, > this would be very simple too. You made my day :)) P -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-dev

Re: [Windows] Remove the default binding between buffer-zoom and Alt+0

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 02:00:10AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > I would propose to change the default binding to Ctrl+0, as it's more > common (although not ubiquitous), and this would fix the problem of > changing zoom when you try to insert a character. > > What do you think of this? Looks

Creating a branch in the features repository

Recently I've created a new branch in the features repository as described here: https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGit#toc3 But there were some messages about big file. Is it normal? Here is the Git output: - C:\Projects\LyXGit\lyx>git push features InsetPar

Re: Change LyX release numbering to Semantic Versioning

Le 13/01/2021 à 11:22, José Abílio Matos a écrit : On a more serious note, I do not insist on the particular use of the x.0 convention. I find it elegant and it gives a nice justification, for example, why gcc stable releases always starts at .1. FWIW gcc started the new numbering scheme at versi