Jose,
are the proposed changes sensible?
I remember there were flowing similar patches to python codebase before.
Pavel
- Forwarded message from "Leo L. Schwab" -
From: "Leo L. Schwab"
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#1002821: lyx-common: String/Bytes Problem in
Am 27.12.2021 um 20:30 schrieb José Abílio Matos :
>
> On Saturday, 25 December 2021 18.32.21 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 12:58:19PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> Hi Scott,
> I find you choice of dates very convenient. :-)
>
>
Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:48:38 -0500
schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> > Maybe some native English speaker would fit here better.
>
> A comment in LyX's code? Something just like the following?
>
> // Using Clang and fsanitize suggests there is an issue here but we do
> // not understand the code
Am 28.12.2021 um 13:55 schrieb José Abílio Matos :
>
> On Tuesday, 28 December 2021 12.33.57 WET Stephan Witt wrote:
> > The LyX tasks here are IMO:
> > 1. Assure the detected python3 is used consequently. This is not the case
> > ATM.
> > 2. Document the meaning of the prompts the LyX user is
