Re: Help with patch to display frame number in LyX display

2022-11-25 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, dem 25.11.2022 um 21:55 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > This change causes some annoyances and in theory I don't think it > should be needed. However, without the change the LabelString doesn't > show up at all. Is it a LyX bug that the LabelString in the patch > doesn't show up when

Help with patch to display frame number in LyX display

2022-11-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
The attached patch (thanks to racoon!) is one of my favorite patches that I apply locally. I find it helpful to know the frame numbers of the frames, especially when I'm going back and forth with the PDF output. The main problem with the patch is that for some reason to get it to work we needed

Re: Get rid of the "Let it run" prompt?

2022-11-25 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, dem 25.11.2022 um 09:10 -0700 schrieb Joel Kulesza: > > Perhaps a related use: reporting render time in the status bar. In > > particular, I would find this useful for long-rendering documents > > that I have a sense of

Re: Get rid of the "Let it run" prompt?

2022-11-25 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, dem 25.11.2022 um 09:10 -0700 schrieb Joel Kulesza: > Perhaps a related use: reporting render time in the status bar.  In > particular, I would find this useful for long-rendering documents > that I have a sense of time for.  When the time is well exceeded, I > can assume that I've

Re: Get rid of the "Let it run" prompt?

2022-11-25 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 8:39 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 02:26:27PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 05:51:58PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > > Am Montag, dem 21.11.2022 um 14:50 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > Nice, thank you! > > >

Re: Get rid of the "Let it run" prompt?

2022-11-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 02:26:27PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 05:51:58PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Montag, dem 21.11.2022 um 14:50 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > Nice, thank you! > > > > > > Should I go ahead with removing the "Let it run"

Re: 2.4.0 plan for #12215 [LyX crashes with async processes (Qt6 only)] ?

2022-11-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:48:37 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 23/11/2022 à 04:13, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : > > In general, from the LyX bug report, it looks like they're building LyX > > but not Qt with debug iterators enabled. > > > > That is a bad idea. libstdc++ debug mode

LyX: include he_cua to distribution

2022-11-25 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Hi Iddo We plan to include your he_cua.bind file (from http://www.ma.huji.ac.il/~sameti/tex/lyxhebrew.html) to the next version of LyX in a modified form (see https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12052) In order to do this, we'd need your license agreement, posted to the LyX devel mailing list (just

Re: [LyX/2.3.x] Qt4 compilable again

2022-11-25 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 04:21:04PM +, José Matos wrote: > On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 22:47 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > +#else > > +#define qDegreesToRadians(degree) (degree * (M_PI / 180)) > > +#endif > > Probably here it does not mater but in general the safer version would > be to move the

Re: LyX 2.3.7 translations

2022-11-25 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 08:54:10AM +0200, Yuri Chornoivan wrote: > Please find the attached update of Ukrainian translation (tested for > validity). Thanks, it's in. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel