Re: CMake: LYX_PROGRAM_SUFFIX=OFF -> user dir .lyx or .lyx2.4?

2024-05-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
For a reference point, that is what happens with auto tools. However the macOS packaging usus the same convention as you describe. Kornel, we should decide what is best :) JMarc Le 26 mai 2024 04:52:40 GMT+02:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >(not important for 2.4.0 release) > > >If I set: > >

Re: 2.4.0 Tarballs

2024-05-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 10:46:06PM GMT, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > > Let's have a day or two of testing. Assuming all goes well, we can build > binaries early next week, and release at the end of the week. Builds well here and a few simpl

CMake: LYX_PROGRAM_SUFFIX=OFF -> user dir .lyx or .lyx2.4?

2024-05-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
(not important for 2.4.0 release) If I set: -DLYX_PROGRAM_SUFFIX=OFF then the created binary is just "lyx" (as opposed to lyx24). However, the user directory is ~/.lyx2.4. In this case, shouldn't the user directory be ~/.lyx? Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel m

2.4.0 Tarballs

2024-05-25 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
Here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Let's have a day or two of testing. Assuming all goes well, we can build binaries early next week, and release at the end of the week. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

2.4.0 Tarballs

2024-05-25 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
Here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Let's have a day or two of testing. Assuming all goes well, we can build tarballs early next week, and release at the end of the week. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Translation status for 2.4.0

2024-05-25 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 12:01:16AM +0200, JP wrote: > I see that French misses 5 translations. > I am puzzled because locally with 2.4.x up to date after git pull and > strings remerged, the translation is up to date. > Am I missing something? Just old status, current 2.4.x shows 0 untranslated...

Translation status for 2.4.0

2024-05-25 Thread JP
Dear developers On the "trunk" translation page https://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk I see that French misses 5 translations. I am puzzled because locally with 2.4.x up to date after git pull and strings remerged, the translation is up to date. Am I missing something? -- Jean-Pierre -- lyx-devel m

Re: BUG [Was Re: TESTING Tarballs for 2.4.0]

2024-05-25 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 5/23/24 14:31, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:28:09PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 5/14/24 10:29, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 04:13:49PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 03:27:13PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 05

Re: LyX 2.4 -- memory full when trying to copy a math block having boxed expression with 4 levels of nested deep subscript

2024-05-25 Thread Alexander Dunlap
See https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/13069 On Sat, May 25, 2024, at 4:28 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:35:28PM -0400, Alexander Dunlap wrote: > > >>> I can reproduce this. I investigated a little and it seems that the > > >>> problem is that the "while (true)" loop in the spl

Re: LyX 2.4 -- memory full when trying to copy a math block having boxed expression with 4 levels of nested deep subscript

2024-05-25 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:35:28PM -0400, Alexander Dunlap wrote: > >>> I can reproduce this. I investigated a little and it seems that the > >>> problem is that the "while (true)" loop in the splitAndWrapInMText > >>> function in InsetMathBox.cpp is never terminating. I believe that the > >>> r