Ben M. wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > i think the real point is that there is no code implementing it.
>
> Would any "new code" really be involved?
except that you need to do this per-inset basis probably no.
just go ahead for it ;)
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> A general remark: I would really prefer such features to be implemented
> at InsetText level (or in a new intermediate inset if need be).
> Collapsable insets are just insets that are collapsable, and yet they
> implement many features that are not relevant (inset lay
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Ben M. wrote:
>> Yes, but any extra packages should be specified in the preamble.
>> Since there are many ERT for which a preview is possible, shouldn't
>> LyX give users the option?
>
> Yes, I think we should implement a preview option for InsetFlex (or
> collapsabl
"Ben M." writes:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> i think the real point is that there is no code implementing it.
>
> Would any "new code" really be involved? I don't know any details
> about LyX's implementation of insets, but both math and "Input" child
> documents suppo
Ben M. wrote:
> Yes, but any extra packages should be specified in the preamble.
> Since there are many ERT for which a preview is possible, shouldn't
> LyX give users the option?
Yes, I think we should implement a preview option for InsetFlex (or
collapsables in general) that can be enabled on a
Ben M. wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
i think the real point is that there is no code implementing it.
Would any "new code" really be involved? I don't know any details
about LyX's implementation of insets, but both math and "Input" child
documents support instant p
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> i think the real point is that there is no code implementing it.
Would any "new code" really be involved? I don't know any details
about LyX's implementation of insets, but both math and "Input" child
documents support instant preview. So I mi
Ben M. wrote:
> Both JMarc and Jurgen seem to think this feature could be useful. I'd
> like to see some clearer justification, or reopen the ticket. What do
> others think? Thanks!
i think the real point is that there is no code implementing it. i'm nearly
sure that if you come up with working
Hi all,
Five years ago I requested an instant preview option for ERT in:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1723
Uwe just marked this as wontfix, and I disagree with that decision.
Uwe wrote:
>>> A general preview for ERT is impossible because there are countless LaTeX
>>> packages available.
Ye
