On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:13:16AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 05.07.2016 um 18:40 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> >
> > Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >> I am really curious to know Pavel's configure line given that he uses
> >> gcc. If I could reproduce the problems then I would be able to
Am 05.07.2016 um 18:40 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> I am really curious to know Pavel's configure line given that he uses
>> gcc. If I could reproduce the problems then I would be able to test
>> beforehand more thoroughly when useful.
>
> wrote in the other
Le 05/07/2016 18:40, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
wrote in the other mail, but to be clear i don't expect you to test
all possible gcc or auttools variants before commiting stuff, we have
to live with bugs like that. p
Thank you for your patience.
Guillaume Munch wrote:
> I am really curious to know Pavel's configure line given that he uses
> gcc. If I could reproduce the problems then I would be able to test
> beforehand more thoroughly when useful.
wrote in the other mail, but to be clear i don't expect you to test
all possible gcc or
Le 05/07/2016 00:33, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Am 05.07.2016 um 00:24 schrieb Guillaume Munch :
Le 04/07/2016 12:06, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Hi Guillaume,
now I’m getting: …
Where are we after Pavel's and your changes?
I’m able to build LyX again.
But as Pavel said already:
> Am 05.07.2016 um 00:24 schrieb Guillaume Munch :
>
> Le 04/07/2016 12:06, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>> now I’m getting: …
>>
>
> Where are we after Pavel's and your changes?
I’m able to build LyX again.
But as Pavel said already: a git bisect was nearly
Le 04/07/2016 12:06, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Hi Guillaume,
now I’m getting: …
Where are we after Pavel's and your changes?
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 04.07.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> >
> > Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >> commit 670efa8f646218f2a378f0cc614c4c37a9f6b89a
> >> Author: Guillaume Munch
> >> Date: Sun Jun 19 03:39:38 2016 +0100
> >>
> >>Rationalise includes
> >>
>
Am 04.07.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> commit 670efa8f646218f2a378f0cc614c4c37a9f6b89a
>> Author: Guillaume Munch
>> Date: Sun Jun 19 03:39:38 2016 +0100
>>
>>Rationalise includes
>>
>>Modifying TexRow.h or texstream.h
Guillaume Munch wrote:
> commit 670efa8f646218f2a378f0cc614c4c37a9f6b89a
> Author: Guillaume Munch
> Date: Sun Jun 19 03:39:38 2016 +0100
>
> Rationalise includes
>
> Modifying TexRow.h or texstream.h no longer triggers the recompilation of
> the
> complete
Hi Guillaume,
the iostream resp. sstream include issues I’ve changed myself.
The math related things I cannot fix.
Furthermore I’m seeing this warning:
In file included from /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/lyxfind.cpp:42:
/Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/mathed/MathStream.h:29:1: warning: class
Hi Guillaume,
now I’m getting:
/Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/output_docbook.cpp:108:7: error: invalid operands to
binary expression ('odocstream' (aka 'basic_ostream') and 'int')
os << '\n';
~~ ^
I have to add another
12 matches
Mail list logo