Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:13:16AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 05.07.2016 um 18:40 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > > > Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> I am really curious to know Pavel's configure line given that he uses > >> gcc. If I could reproduce the problems then I would be able to

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-06 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 05.07.2016 um 18:40 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > Guillaume Munch wrote: >> I am really curious to know Pavel's configure line given that he uses >> gcc. If I could reproduce the problems then I would be able to test >> beforehand more thoroughly when useful. > > wrote in the other

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-05 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 05/07/2016 18:40, Pavel Sanda a écrit : wrote in the other mail, but to be clear i don't expect you to test all possible gcc or auttools variants before commiting stuff, we have to live with bugs like that. p Thank you for your patience.

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Guillaume Munch wrote: > I am really curious to know Pavel's configure line given that he uses > gcc. If I could reproduce the problems then I would be able to test > beforehand more thoroughly when useful. wrote in the other mail, but to be clear i don't expect you to test all possible gcc or

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-05 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 05/07/2016 00:33, Stephan Witt a écrit : Am 05.07.2016 um 00:24 schrieb Guillaume Munch : Le 04/07/2016 12:06, Stephan Witt a écrit : Hi Guillaume, now I’m getting: … Where are we after Pavel's and your changes? I’m able to build LyX again. But as Pavel said already:

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-04 Thread Stephan Witt
> Am 05.07.2016 um 00:24 schrieb Guillaume Munch : > > Le 04/07/2016 12:06, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> Hi Guillaume, >> >> now I’m getting: … >> > > Where are we after Pavel's and your changes? I’m able to build LyX again. But as Pavel said already: a git bisect was nearly

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-04 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 04/07/2016 12:06, Stephan Witt a écrit : Hi Guillaume, now I’m getting: … Where are we after Pavel's and your changes?

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 04.07.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > > > Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> commit 670efa8f646218f2a378f0cc614c4c37a9f6b89a > >> Author: Guillaume Munch > >> Date: Sun Jun 19 03:39:38 2016 +0100 > >> > >>Rationalise includes > >> >

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-04 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 04.07.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > Guillaume Munch wrote: >> commit 670efa8f646218f2a378f0cc614c4c37a9f6b89a >> Author: Guillaume Munch >> Date: Sun Jun 19 03:39:38 2016 +0100 >> >>Rationalise includes >> >>Modifying TexRow.h or texstream.h

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
Guillaume Munch wrote: > commit 670efa8f646218f2a378f0cc614c4c37a9f6b89a > Author: Guillaume Munch > Date: Sun Jun 19 03:39:38 2016 +0100 > > Rationalise includes > > Modifying TexRow.h or texstream.h no longer triggers the recompilation of > the > complete

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-04 Thread Stephan Witt
Hi Guillaume, the iostream resp. sstream include issues I’ve changed myself. The math related things I cannot fix. Furthermore I’m seeing this warning: In file included from /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/lyxfind.cpp:42: /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/mathed/MathStream.h:29:1: warning: class

Re: [LyX/master] Rationalise includes

2016-07-04 Thread Stephan Witt
Hi Guillaume, now I’m getting: /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/output_docbook.cpp:108:7: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('odocstream' (aka 'basic_ostream') and 'int') os << '\n'; ~~ ^ I have to add another