Am 21.11.2022 um 19:00 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Montag, dem 21.11.2022 um 18:53 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> Not easy, this would require to rewrite the spell check chunk split
>> algorithm.
>>
>> ATM the complete paragraph is passed to the Apple spell checker at
>> once.
>>
Am Montag, dem 21.11.2022 um 18:53 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Not easy, this would require to rewrite the spell check chunk split
> algorithm.
>
> ATM the complete paragraph is passed to the Apple spell checker at
> once.
> Obviously it won’t mark the unlearned word as misspelled in this
>
Am Sonntag, dem 20.11.2022 um 12:34 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Yes, it never worked before.
>
> If unlearnWord is called it has an effect for learned words only.
>
> There is no call interface to unlearn a word in main dictionary.
I see. But wouldn't it be possible to use an exception list
Am 20.11.2022 um 12:01 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 16.11.2022 um 07:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> I’ve made two patches on top of Isaacs patch to make it work again on
>> Mac.
>> See attached patches. 1st one is the patch from Isaac, 2nd and 3rd
>> are mine.
>
>
Am Sonntag, dem 20.11.2022 um 12:01 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> It works for me with Hunspell (note that the lists are only saved
> upon
> LyX closure).
>
> What I find odd, though, is the naming in the menu. When I click on a
> word that is in the main dictionary, e.g. "table", it offers
Am Mittwoch, dem 16.11.2022 um 07:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> I’ve made two patches on top of Isaacs patch to make it work again on
> Mac.
> See attached patches. 1st one is the patch from Isaac, 2nd and 3rd
> are mine.
Thanks!
> 1. There are code paths with SpellChecker::WORD_OK with
testing, but I've been using
>> this patch for a while now and haven't noticed any extra lag in spell
>> checking.
>>
>>
>>
>> — Isaac Oscar Gariano
>> From: Stephan Witt
>> Sent: Monday, 16 May 2022 2:07 AM
>> To: Isaac Oscar Gariano
>&
do.
>>
>> I should probably do some performance testing, but I've been using
>> this patch for a while now and haven't noticed any extra lag in spell
>> checking.
>>
>>
>>
>> — Isaac Oscar Gariano
>> From: Stephan Witt
>>
; I should probably do some performance testing, but I've been using
> this patch for a while now and haven't noticed any extra lag in spell
> checking.
>
>
>
> — Isaac Oscar Gariano
> From: Stephan Witt
> Sent: Monday, 16 May 2022 2:07 AM
> To: Isaac Oscar Gariano
extra lag in spell checking.
— Isaac Oscar Gariano
From: Stephan Witt
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2022 2:07 AM
To: Isaac Oscar Gariano
Cc: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow removing words from the personal dictionary, that
weren't previously added
Le 26/04/2022 à 09:27, Isaac Oscar Gariano a écrit :
I've made the "Remove from personal dictionary" function/context menu
item work for words that haven't been previously added, but instead are
in the system-wide dictionary.
Dear Isaac,
Thanks for the patch. Unfortunately, I just realize
Am Sonntag, dem 15.05.2022 um 15:58 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 26/04/2022 à 09:27, Isaac Oscar Gariano a écrit :
> > I've made the "Remove from personal dictionary" function/context
> > menu
> > item work for words that haven't been previously added, but instead
> > are
> > in the
Am 26.04.2022 um 09:27 schrieb Isaac Oscar Gariano :
>
> I've made the "Remove from personal dictionary" function/context menu item
> work for words that haven't been previously added, but instead are in the
> system-wide dictionary.
> I've modified the behaviour so that it will cause the word
Le 26/04/2022 à 09:27, Isaac Oscar Gariano a écrit :
I've made the "Remove from personal dictionary" function/context menu
item work for words that haven't been previously added, but instead are
in the system-wide dictionary.
Juergen,
Did you have time to look at this patch?
JMarc
I've
I've made the "Remove from personal dictionary" function/context menu item work
for words that haven't been previously added, but instead are in the
system-wide dictionary.
I've modified the behaviour so that it will cause the word to be marked as
incorrectly spelt, regardless of whether it is
15 matches
Mail list logo
