Hi,
Firstly, let me say that I'm really impressed with Lyx 1.2.0. The new
features are great, and it has been very stable for me so far. Great job.
One problem I had importing Lyx1.1.6 documents is that Lyx 1.2.0 insists
on specifying a rotation origin to includegraphics. The default 'origin=c'
John Keane wrote:
>
> Firstly, let me say that I'm really impressed with Lyx 1.2.0. The new
> features are great, and it has been very stable for me so far. Great job.
>
> One problem I had importing Lyx1.1.6 documents is that Lyx 1.2.0 insists
> on specifying a rotation origin to includegraphi
Hi,
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> this is from graphicx.sty
>
> \define@key{Gin}{origin}[c]{%
>\def\Gin@erotate{\Grot@box@kv[origin=#1]}}
>
> which means, that the default is origin=c. Why should there be a
> difference when running without this option?
>
This just means t
KDozer wrote:
> if (!params().rotateOrigin.empty()) {
> options << " origin=" << params().rotateOrigin[0];
>
> if rotateOrigin="" then the latex code is
>
> includegraphics[]
>
> which is treated differently by graphicx.sty
yes, you're right. Sorry ...
but we can handle this in an
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
> but we can handle this in an easier way, because the
> default (the Reference Point) is not cc (center)
> but lB (leftBaseline)
ok, I see, I guess setting the default value to lB should have the same
effect. I still prefer my patch, as it minimizes the
John Keane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>> but we can handle this in an easier way, because the
>> default (the Reference Point) is not cc (center)
>> but lB (leftBaseline)
>
| ok, I see, I guess setting the default value to lB should have the same
| ef
> "John" == John Keane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> It's a personal preference, as my colleagues don't use Lyx, so
John> revisions have to be made on latex files - it's nice if they're
John> as simple as possible.
I agree with that. We would be interested too by patches that make the
l
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> John Keane wrote:
>> Firstly, let me say that I'm really impressed with Lyx 1.2.0. The
>> new features are great, and it has been very stable for me so far.
>> Great job. One problem I had importing Lyx1.1.6 documents is that
>>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>"Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
> Herbert> John Keane wrote:
>
>>>Firstly, let me say that I'm really impressed with Lyx 1.2.0. The
>>>new features are great, and it has been very stable for me so far.
>>>Great job. One problem I
