José Matos wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 14:21:58 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Which one? The one that add a redundant updateToc() in LyXView or the
one that updates the dialogs only if this is not LFUN_UPDATE_DIALOG in
LyXFunc?
Conceptually speaking, the later is more correct, even if this means a
On Monday 09 July 2007 14:21:58 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Which one? The one that add a redundant updateToc() in LyXView or the
> one that updates the dialogs only if this is not LFUN_UPDATE_DIALOG in
> LyXFunc?
>
> Conceptually speaking, the later is more correct, even if this means a
> special c
José Matos wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 13:55:01 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The part below was not meant to be in the patch, please ignore:
If that fixes the bug then OK.
Which one? The one that add a redundant updateToc() in LyXView or the
one that updates the dialogs only if this is not LF
On Monday 09 July 2007 13:55:01 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> The part below was not meant to be in the patch, please ignore:
If that fixes the bug then OK.
--
José Abílio
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> The problem here is that the Toc dialog has not been
Abdelrazak> reconstructed (because it comes after in the list of
Abdelrazak> dialogs).
Abdelrazak> This patch sho
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> The problem here is that the Toc dialog has not been
Abdelrazak> reconstructed (because it comes after in the list of
Abdelrazak> dialogs).
Abdelrazak> This patch should definitely go _before_
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> The problem here is that the Toc dialog has not been
Abdelrazak> reconstructed (because it comes after in the list of
Abdelrazak> dialogs).
Abdelrazak> This patch should definitely go _before_
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> The problem here is that the Toc dialog has not been
Abdelrazak> reconstructed (because it comes after in the list of
Abdelrazak> dialogs).
Abdelrazak> This patch should definitely go _before_ 1.5.0; OK?
I understand
The reason is that closing a Buffer triggers an update of all opened
dialogs when dispatching LFUN_DIALOG_UPDATE (hence the patch). The path
is as following:
setBuffer() -> updateBufferDependent() -> RestoreButton() -> LFUN
The problem here is that the Toc dialog has not been reconstructed
(b
