[PATCH] InsetInclude and version control bug

2003-01-29 Thread Allan Rae
An annoying bug in multipart document support occurs when you use a VCS like RCS on the documents. Load the master, update DVI to get all the other parts loaded, now try to edit one of the auto-loaded docs. You can't because the lyxvc for that document wasn't setup. A simple one line fix is atta

Re: [PATCH] InsetInclude and version control bug

2003-01-29 Thread Rod Pinna
> > I keep getting "Error 400" when trying to access bugzilla.lyx.org. > Any ideas? You get that with http://... (at least I do). Try it with https://... Rod _ rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be / |

Re: [PATCH] InsetInclude and version control bug

2003-01-29 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Rod Pinna wrote: > > I keep getting "Error 400" when trying to access bugzilla.lyx.org. > > Any ideas? > > You get that with http://... (at least I do). Try it with https://... Thanks Rod. It seems out bugzilla mailer inserts the wrong protocol for the website. Allan. (ARRa

Re: [PATCH] InsetInclude and version control bug

2003-01-30 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:28:22PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > Thanks Rod. It seems out bugzilla mailer inserts the wrong protocol > for the website. Actually it's the other way round. http:// was broken recently for some reason regards john

Re: [PATCH] InsetInclude and version control bug

2003-02-04 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Allan Rae wrote: > An annoying bug in multipart document support occurs when you use a > VCS like RCS on the documents. Load the master, update DVI to get all > the other parts loaded, now try to edit one of the auto-loaded docs. > You can't because the lyxvc for that documen

Re: [PATCH] InsetInclude and version control bug

2003-02-04 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:37:19PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > Does someone want to comment on this bug fix? For example, may I > commit it or not? The bug isn't in Bugzilla as far as I can see > but that doesn't make it any less annoying. It's too late for 1.3.0 IMHO. We have plenty of unfixed b

Re: [PATCH] InsetInclude and version control bug

2003-02-05 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:37:19PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > Does someone want to comment on this bug fix? For example, may I > > commit it or not? The bug isn't in Bugzilla as far as I can see > > but that doesn't make it any less annoying. > > It's t

Re: [PATCH] InsetInclude and version control bug

2003-02-13 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:15:37PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > +2003-01-27 Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > + > + * insetinclude.C (loadIfNeeded): included files might be under > + VCS control so we need loadLyXFile() not readFile() for that. > + Are you still planning to apply this at som

Re: [PATCH] InsetInclude and version control bug

2003-02-13 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:15:37PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > +2003-01-27 Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > + > > + * insetinclude.C (loadIfNeeded): included files might be under > > + VCS control so we need loadLyXFile() not readFile() for that. >

Re: [PATCH] InsetInclude and version control bug

2003-02-13 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Allan Rae wrote: > Yes, but I haven't gotten around to it yet. Will update again and > commit today. Haven't had time after all. Feel free to make the one line change yourself. Allan. (ARRae)