An annoying bug in multipart document support occurs when you use a
VCS like RCS on the documents. Load the master, update DVI to get all
the other parts loaded, now try to edit one of the auto-loaded docs.
You can't because the lyxvc for that document wasn't setup.
A simple one line fix is atta
>
> I keep getting "Error 400" when trying to access bugzilla.lyx.org.
> Any ideas?
You get that with http://... (at least I do). Try it with https://...
Rod
_
rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be /
|
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Rod Pinna wrote:
> > I keep getting "Error 400" when trying to access bugzilla.lyx.org.
> > Any ideas?
>
> You get that with http://... (at least I do). Try it with https://...
Thanks Rod. It seems out bugzilla mailer inserts the wrong protocol
for the website.
Allan. (ARRa
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:28:22PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Thanks Rod. It seems out bugzilla mailer inserts the wrong protocol
> for the website.
Actually it's the other way round. http:// was broken recently for some
reason
regards
john
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
> An annoying bug in multipart document support occurs when you use a
> VCS like RCS on the documents. Load the master, update DVI to get all
> the other parts loaded, now try to edit one of the auto-loaded docs.
> You can't because the lyxvc for that documen
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:37:19PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Does someone want to comment on this bug fix? For example, may I
> commit it or not? The bug isn't in Bugzilla as far as I can see
> but that doesn't make it any less annoying.
It's too late for 1.3.0 IMHO. We have plenty of unfixed b
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:37:19PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Does someone want to comment on this bug fix? For example, may I
> > commit it or not? The bug isn't in Bugzilla as far as I can see
> > but that doesn't make it any less annoying.
>
> It's t
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:15:37PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> +2003-01-27 Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +
> + * insetinclude.C (loadIfNeeded): included files might be under
> + VCS control so we need loadLyXFile() not readFile() for that.
> +
Are you still planning to apply this at som
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:15:37PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > +2003-01-27 Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > +
> > + * insetinclude.C (loadIfNeeded): included files might be under
> > + VCS control so we need loadLyXFile() not readFile() for that.
>
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
> Yes, but I haven't gotten around to it yet. Will update again and
> commit today.
Haven't had time after all. Feel free to make the one line change
yourself.
Allan. (ARRae)
10 matches
Mail list logo