On 13-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
There is still the Changelog missing in the diff-file please resubmit!
sorry, I thought it was as other projects, where the changelog doesn't go
in the diff so there's not syncing problems between patches. New
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing
crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems difficult to get Qt to redo
the layout, and remove the widget
Just disable it then. You don't
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:14:06PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing
crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems difficult to get Qt to redo
the
On 13-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>> There is still the Changelog missing in the diff-file please resubmit!
>>
>
> sorry, I thought it was as other projects, where the changelog doesn't go
> in the diff so there's not syncing problems between
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> > This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing
> > crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems difficult to get Qt to redo
> > the layout, and remove the widget
>
> Just disable it then.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:14:06PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> > > This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing
> > > crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems difficult to get Qt to
Lars, I've confirmed it's not KDE code that's causing the weirdness with
NEW_INSETS defined. I see you ignored my previous comments so I must be
saying something really stupid :(
This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing
crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars, I've confirmed it's not KDE code that's causing the weirdness with
| NEW_INSETS defined. I see you ignored my previous comments so I must be
| saying something really stupid :(
It is not that I am ignoring it. More that I don't have time to look
into
On 13-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote:
2000-09-13 John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* src/frontends/kde/Makefile.am
* src/frontends/kde/FormRef.C
* src/frontends/kde/FormRef.h
* src/frontends/kde/formrefdialog.C
* src/frontends/kde/formrefdialog.h: implement
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
There is still the Changelog missing in the diff-file please resubmit!
sorry, I thought it was as other projects, where the changelog doesn't go
in the diff so there's not syncing problems between patches. New one with
Changelog diff included. Sorry
On 13 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
It is not that I am ignoring it. More that I don't have time to look
into this right now.
of course, sorry to suggest otherwise
Anyway if you want to help you should use the
XForms frontend first and help make that work. Then we should check
the
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Jürgen
|
| P.S.: Lars did you already give John cvs rights?
No, but I will.
Lgb
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing
crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems difficult to get Qt to redo
the layout, and remove the widget
Just disable it then. You don't have to make the KDE port work and look
just
Lars, I've confirmed it's not KDE code that's causing the weirdness with
NEW_INSETS defined. I see you ignored my previous comments so I must be
saying something really stupid :(
This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing
crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars, I've confirmed it's not KDE code that's causing the weirdness with
| NEW_INSETS defined. I see you ignored my previous comments so I must be
| saying something really stupid :(
It is not that I am ignoring it. More that I don't have time to look
On 13-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote:
> 2000-09-13 John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * src/frontends/kde/Makefile.am
> * src/frontends/kde/FormRef.C
> * src/frontends/kde/FormRef.h
> * src/frontends/kde/formrefdialog.C
> * src/frontends/kde/formrefdialog.h: implement
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> There is still the Changelog missing in the diff-file please resubmit!
>
sorry, I thought it was as other projects, where the changelog doesn't go
in the diff so there's not syncing problems between patches. New one with
Changelog diff included. Sorry
On 13 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> It is not that I am ignoring it. More that I don't have time to look
> into this right now.
of course, sorry to suggest otherwise
> Anyway if you want to help you should use the
> XForms frontend first and help make that work. Then we should check
>
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jürgen
|
| P.S.: Lars did you already give John cvs rights?
No, but I will.
Lgb
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing
> crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems difficult to get Qt to redo
> the layout, and remove the widget
Just disable it then. You don't have to make the KDE port work and look
20 matches
Mail list logo
