Re: [PATCH] Re: Don't typeset / noload

2002-09-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 12:54:27PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: In my opinion you can remove this. John Please review. It seems to work for me. Concerning the usefulness of this feature. I think it is latex' \includeonly feature, where some parts

Re: [PATCH] Re: Don't typeset / noload

2002-09-09 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:03:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Concerning the usefulness of this feature. I think it is latex' \includeonly feature, where some parts of the document will not be typeset, but latex will remember the labels, number of pages, etc. If this is what it used

Re: [PATCH] Re: Don't typeset / noload

2002-09-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:03:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes John wrote: Concerning the usefulness of this feature. I think it is latex' \includeonly feature, where some parts of the document will not be typeset, but latex will remember the

Re: [PATCH] Re: Don't typeset / noload

2002-09-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 12:54:27PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: >> In my opinion you can remove this. John> Please review. It seems to work for me. Concerning the usefulness of this feature. I think it is latex' \includeonly feature,

Re: [PATCH] Re: Don't typeset / noload

2002-09-09 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:03:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Concerning the usefulness of this feature. I think it is latex' > \includeonly feature, where some parts of the document will not be > typeset, but latex will remember the labels, number of pages, etc. If this is what it

Re: [PATCH] Re: Don't typeset / noload

2002-09-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:03:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes John> wrote: >> Concerning the usefulness of this feature. I think it is latex' >> \includeonly feature, where some parts of the document will not be >> typeset, but latex

[PATCH] Re: Don't typeset / noload

2002-09-07 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 12:54:27PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: In my opinion you can remove this. Please review. It seems to work for me. 10 files changed, 33 insertions, 158 deletions thanks john -- Are you willing to go out there and save the lives of our children, even if it means

[PATCH] Re: Don't typeset / noload

2002-09-07 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 12:54:27PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > In my opinion you can remove this. Please review. It seems to work for me. 10 files changed, 33 insertions, 158 deletions thanks john -- "Are you willing to go out there and save the lives of our children, even if it means